重度抑郁症、焦虑症与便秘之间的因果关系:双样本孟德尔随机研究。

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
ZhiYu Deng, XiaoYu Zeng, HanYu Wang, Wei Bi, YuMei Huang, Hao Fu
{"title":"重度抑郁症、焦虑症与便秘之间的因果关系:双样本孟德尔随机研究。","authors":"ZhiYu Deng, XiaoYu Zeng, HanYu Wang, Wei Bi, YuMei Huang, Hao Fu","doi":"10.1186/s12876-024-03526-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Epidemiological and other studies have shown correlations among major depressive disorder (MDD), anxiety disorder (AXD) and constipation. However, no consensus has been reached regarding their interdependence and pathogenesis. Herein, we sought to further explore the causal associations between them.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Bidirectional two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis was performed to confirm the causal link between MDD, AXD and constipation. Genetic instrumental variables for MDD, AXD, and constipation were obtained from publicly available genome-wide association studies (GWASs). In this MR analysis, inverse variance weighting (IVW) was used as the primary analysis method to evaluate the causal effect. Additionally, we employed Cochran's Q test, MR‒Egger intercept and MR-PRESSO analysis to examine heterogeneity and pleiotropy. Moreover, leave-one-out analysis was employed to investigate the stability of the associations. Finally, a reverse analysis of Mendelian randomization was conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results revealed a causal relationship between MDD and an increased risk of constipation (p = 0.0001), whereas AXD (p = 8.52 × 10<sup>-1</sup>) did not increase the risk of constipation. In the inverse MR analysis, no causal associations were found (constipation to MDD: p = 9.37 × 10<sup>-1</sup>; constipation to AXD: p = 8.51 × 10<sup>-1</sup>).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This MR study revealed genetic evidence supporting a causal relationship between MDD and constipation.</p>","PeriodicalId":9129,"journal":{"name":"BMC Gastroenterology","volume":"24 1","pages":"434"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Causal relationship between major depressive disorder, anxiety disorder and constipation: a two-sample Mendelian randomization study.\",\"authors\":\"ZhiYu Deng, XiaoYu Zeng, HanYu Wang, Wei Bi, YuMei Huang, Hao Fu\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12876-024-03526-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Epidemiological and other studies have shown correlations among major depressive disorder (MDD), anxiety disorder (AXD) and constipation. However, no consensus has been reached regarding their interdependence and pathogenesis. Herein, we sought to further explore the causal associations between them.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Bidirectional two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis was performed to confirm the causal link between MDD, AXD and constipation. Genetic instrumental variables for MDD, AXD, and constipation were obtained from publicly available genome-wide association studies (GWASs). In this MR analysis, inverse variance weighting (IVW) was used as the primary analysis method to evaluate the causal effect. Additionally, we employed Cochran's Q test, MR‒Egger intercept and MR-PRESSO analysis to examine heterogeneity and pleiotropy. Moreover, leave-one-out analysis was employed to investigate the stability of the associations. Finally, a reverse analysis of Mendelian randomization was conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results revealed a causal relationship between MDD and an increased risk of constipation (p = 0.0001), whereas AXD (p = 8.52 × 10<sup>-1</sup>) did not increase the risk of constipation. In the inverse MR analysis, no causal associations were found (constipation to MDD: p = 9.37 × 10<sup>-1</sup>; constipation to AXD: p = 8.51 × 10<sup>-1</sup>).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This MR study revealed genetic evidence supporting a causal relationship between MDD and constipation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9129,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Gastroenterology\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"434\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Gastroenterology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12876-024-03526-y\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12876-024-03526-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:流行病学和其他研究表明,重度抑郁障碍(MDD)、焦虑障碍(AXD)和便秘之间存在相关性。然而,关于它们之间的相互依存关系和发病机制,尚未达成共识。在此,我们试图进一步探讨它们之间的因果关系:方法:为了证实 MDD、AXD 和便秘之间的因果关系,我们进行了双向双样本孟德尔随机化(MR)分析。MDD、AXD和便秘的遗传工具变量来自公开的全基因组关联研究(GWAS)。在这项 MR 分析中,我们使用了反方差加权(IVW)作为评估因果效应的主要分析方法。此外,我们还采用了 Cochran's Q 检验、MR-Egger 截距和 MR-PRESSO 分析来考察异质性和多义性。此外,我们还采用了 "leave-one-out "分析来研究相关性的稳定性。最后,进行了孟德尔随机化反向分析:结果显示,MDD与便秘风险增加之间存在因果关系(p = 0.0001),而AXD(p = 8.52 × 10-1)不会增加便秘风险。在反向 MR 分析中,没有发现因果关系(便秘与 MDD 的关系:p = 9.37 × 10-1;便秘与 AXD 的关系:p = 8.51 × 10-1):这项磁共振研究揭示了支持 MDD 与便秘之间因果关系的遗传证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Causal relationship between major depressive disorder, anxiety disorder and constipation: a two-sample Mendelian randomization study.

Background: Epidemiological and other studies have shown correlations among major depressive disorder (MDD), anxiety disorder (AXD) and constipation. However, no consensus has been reached regarding their interdependence and pathogenesis. Herein, we sought to further explore the causal associations between them.

Methods: Bidirectional two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis was performed to confirm the causal link between MDD, AXD and constipation. Genetic instrumental variables for MDD, AXD, and constipation were obtained from publicly available genome-wide association studies (GWASs). In this MR analysis, inverse variance weighting (IVW) was used as the primary analysis method to evaluate the causal effect. Additionally, we employed Cochran's Q test, MR‒Egger intercept and MR-PRESSO analysis to examine heterogeneity and pleiotropy. Moreover, leave-one-out analysis was employed to investigate the stability of the associations. Finally, a reverse analysis of Mendelian randomization was conducted.

Results: The results revealed a causal relationship between MDD and an increased risk of constipation (p = 0.0001), whereas AXD (p = 8.52 × 10-1) did not increase the risk of constipation. In the inverse MR analysis, no causal associations were found (constipation to MDD: p = 9.37 × 10-1; constipation to AXD: p = 8.51 × 10-1).

Conclusion: This MR study revealed genetic evidence supporting a causal relationship between MDD and constipation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Gastroenterology
BMC Gastroenterology 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
465
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: BMC Gastroenterology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of gastrointestinal and hepatobiliary disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信