Mehdi Karimi, Ali Ghaheri, Kianmehr Saleh, Zahra Cheraghi, Afshin Farahanchi
{"title":"阿曲库铵与顺阿曲库铵对白内障手术患者 QT 间期变化的影响:随机临床试验。","authors":"Mehdi Karimi, Ali Ghaheri, Kianmehr Saleh, Zahra Cheraghi, Afshin Farahanchi","doi":"10.1186/s12871-024-02820-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Muscle relaxants are used during surgery, but their impact on ECG may differ, potentially affecting cardiac safety. This study aimed to compare the effects of Atracurium versus Cisatracurium on QT interval changes in patients undergoing cataract surgery.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This double-blind, parallel-group randomized clinical trial (RCT) was conducted in 2023 in Hamadan, Iran. A total of 80 patients undergoing cataract surgery under general anesthesia were randomly assigned to receive either Atracurium (n = 40) or Cisatracurium (n = 40). QT interval changes were measured at four time points to assess and compare the corrected QT interval (QTc) between the two groups. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 29, and a p-value < 0.05 was deemed significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Cisatracurium demonstrated significant reductions in QTc from pre-anesthesia to post-anesthesia and through recovery, with values of -9.325 ms (P = 0.045), -9.925 ms (P = 0.038), and - 19.359 ms (P = 0.016), respectively. Atracurium also showed reductions but a notable increase in QTc after anesthesia to the end of surgery (32.322 ms, P = 0.0019). Throughout the procedure, Cisatracurium maintained shorter QTc intervals compared to Atracurium (e.g., T0: 420.07 ms vs. 434.75 ms, P = 0.03), but post-recovery, no significant differences were observed (Cisatracurium: 440.05 ms; Atracurium: 439.80 ms, P = 0.489).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Atracurium causes more QT prolongation than Cisatracurium. While both affect QTc intervals, Cisatracurium has a more stable impact on cardiac repolarization, making it safer for patients at risk of QT prolongation. Cisatracurium's minimal impact on cardiovascular function, especially in patients with low ejection fraction, makes it the preferred choice for maintaining cardiac stability.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>IRCT20120215009014N441.</p>","PeriodicalId":9190,"journal":{"name":"BMC Anesthesiology","volume":"24 1","pages":"431"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11600835/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of Atracurium versus Cisatracurium on QT interval changes in patients undergoing cataract surgery: a randomized clinical trial.\",\"authors\":\"Mehdi Karimi, Ali Ghaheri, Kianmehr Saleh, Zahra Cheraghi, Afshin Farahanchi\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12871-024-02820-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Muscle relaxants are used during surgery, but their impact on ECG may differ, potentially affecting cardiac safety. This study aimed to compare the effects of Atracurium versus Cisatracurium on QT interval changes in patients undergoing cataract surgery.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This double-blind, parallel-group randomized clinical trial (RCT) was conducted in 2023 in Hamadan, Iran. A total of 80 patients undergoing cataract surgery under general anesthesia were randomly assigned to receive either Atracurium (n = 40) or Cisatracurium (n = 40). QT interval changes were measured at four time points to assess and compare the corrected QT interval (QTc) between the two groups. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 29, and a p-value < 0.05 was deemed significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Cisatracurium demonstrated significant reductions in QTc from pre-anesthesia to post-anesthesia and through recovery, with values of -9.325 ms (P = 0.045), -9.925 ms (P = 0.038), and - 19.359 ms (P = 0.016), respectively. Atracurium also showed reductions but a notable increase in QTc after anesthesia to the end of surgery (32.322 ms, P = 0.0019). Throughout the procedure, Cisatracurium maintained shorter QTc intervals compared to Atracurium (e.g., T0: 420.07 ms vs. 434.75 ms, P = 0.03), but post-recovery, no significant differences were observed (Cisatracurium: 440.05 ms; Atracurium: 439.80 ms, P = 0.489).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Atracurium causes more QT prolongation than Cisatracurium. While both affect QTc intervals, Cisatracurium has a more stable impact on cardiac repolarization, making it safer for patients at risk of QT prolongation. Cisatracurium's minimal impact on cardiovascular function, especially in patients with low ejection fraction, makes it the preferred choice for maintaining cardiac stability.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>IRCT20120215009014N441.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9190,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Anesthesiology\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"431\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11600835/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Anesthesiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-024-02820-2\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-024-02820-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Effect of Atracurium versus Cisatracurium on QT interval changes in patients undergoing cataract surgery: a randomized clinical trial.
Background: Muscle relaxants are used during surgery, but their impact on ECG may differ, potentially affecting cardiac safety. This study aimed to compare the effects of Atracurium versus Cisatracurium on QT interval changes in patients undergoing cataract surgery.
Method: This double-blind, parallel-group randomized clinical trial (RCT) was conducted in 2023 in Hamadan, Iran. A total of 80 patients undergoing cataract surgery under general anesthesia were randomly assigned to receive either Atracurium (n = 40) or Cisatracurium (n = 40). QT interval changes were measured at four time points to assess and compare the corrected QT interval (QTc) between the two groups. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 29, and a p-value < 0.05 was deemed significant.
Results: Cisatracurium demonstrated significant reductions in QTc from pre-anesthesia to post-anesthesia and through recovery, with values of -9.325 ms (P = 0.045), -9.925 ms (P = 0.038), and - 19.359 ms (P = 0.016), respectively. Atracurium also showed reductions but a notable increase in QTc after anesthesia to the end of surgery (32.322 ms, P = 0.0019). Throughout the procedure, Cisatracurium maintained shorter QTc intervals compared to Atracurium (e.g., T0: 420.07 ms vs. 434.75 ms, P = 0.03), but post-recovery, no significant differences were observed (Cisatracurium: 440.05 ms; Atracurium: 439.80 ms, P = 0.489).
Conclusions: Atracurium causes more QT prolongation than Cisatracurium. While both affect QTc intervals, Cisatracurium has a more stable impact on cardiac repolarization, making it safer for patients at risk of QT prolongation. Cisatracurium's minimal impact on cardiovascular function, especially in patients with low ejection fraction, makes it the preferred choice for maintaining cardiac stability.
期刊介绍:
BMC Anesthesiology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of anesthesiology, critical care, perioperative care and pain management, including clinical and experimental research into anesthetic mechanisms, administration and efficacy, technology and monitoring, and associated economic issues.