将实时神经成像与机器学习相结合,研究婴儿期对熟悉面孔的注意力:原理验证研究

IF 3.1 1区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL
Elena Throm, Anna Gui, Rianne Haartsen, Pedro F. da Costa, Robert Leech, Luke Mason, Emily J. H. Jones
{"title":"将实时神经成像与机器学习相结合,研究婴儿期对熟悉面孔的注意力:原理验证研究","authors":"Elena Throm,&nbsp;Anna Gui,&nbsp;Rianne Haartsen,&nbsp;Pedro F. da Costa,&nbsp;Robert Leech,&nbsp;Luke Mason,&nbsp;Emily J. H. Jones","doi":"10.1111/desc.13592","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Looking at caregivers’ faces is important for early social development, and there is a concomitant increase in neural correlates of attention to familiar versus novel faces in the first 6 months. However, by 12 months of age brain responses may not differentiate between familiar and unfamiliar faces. Traditional group-based analyses do not examine whether these ‘null’ findings stem from a true lack of preference within individual infants, or whether groups of infants show individually strong but heterogeneous preferences for familiar versus unfamiliar faces. In a preregistered proof-of-principle study, we applied Neuroadaptive Bayesian Optimisation (NBO) to test how individual infants’ neural responses vary across faces differing in familiarity. Sixty-one 5–12-month-olds viewed faces resulting from gradually morphing a familiar (primary caregiver) into an unfamiliar face. Electroencephalography (EEG) data from fronto-central channels were analysed in real-time. After the presentation of each face, the Negative central (Nc) event-related potential (ERP) amplitude was calculated. A Bayesian Optimisation algorithm iteratively selected the next stimulus until it identified the stimulus eliciting the strongest Nc for that infant. Attrition (15%) was lower than in traditional studies (22%). Although there was no group-level Nc-difference between familiar versus unfamiliar faces, an optimum was predicted in 85% of the children, indicating individual-level attentional preferences. Traditional analyses based on infants’ predicted optimum confirmed NBO can identify subgroups based on brain activation. Optima were not related to age and social behaviour. NBO suggests the lack of overall familiar/unfamiliar-face attentional preference in middle infancy is explained by heterogeneous preferences, rather than a lack of preference within individual infants.</p>","PeriodicalId":48392,"journal":{"name":"Developmental Science","volume":"28 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/desc.13592","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Combining Real-Time Neuroimaging With Machine Learning to Study Attention to Familiar Faces During Infancy: A Proof of Principle Study\",\"authors\":\"Elena Throm,&nbsp;Anna Gui,&nbsp;Rianne Haartsen,&nbsp;Pedro F. da Costa,&nbsp;Robert Leech,&nbsp;Luke Mason,&nbsp;Emily J. H. Jones\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/desc.13592\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Looking at caregivers’ faces is important for early social development, and there is a concomitant increase in neural correlates of attention to familiar versus novel faces in the first 6 months. However, by 12 months of age brain responses may not differentiate between familiar and unfamiliar faces. Traditional group-based analyses do not examine whether these ‘null’ findings stem from a true lack of preference within individual infants, or whether groups of infants show individually strong but heterogeneous preferences for familiar versus unfamiliar faces. In a preregistered proof-of-principle study, we applied Neuroadaptive Bayesian Optimisation (NBO) to test how individual infants’ neural responses vary across faces differing in familiarity. Sixty-one 5–12-month-olds viewed faces resulting from gradually morphing a familiar (primary caregiver) into an unfamiliar face. Electroencephalography (EEG) data from fronto-central channels were analysed in real-time. After the presentation of each face, the Negative central (Nc) event-related potential (ERP) amplitude was calculated. A Bayesian Optimisation algorithm iteratively selected the next stimulus until it identified the stimulus eliciting the strongest Nc for that infant. Attrition (15%) was lower than in traditional studies (22%). Although there was no group-level Nc-difference between familiar versus unfamiliar faces, an optimum was predicted in 85% of the children, indicating individual-level attentional preferences. Traditional analyses based on infants’ predicted optimum confirmed NBO can identify subgroups based on brain activation. Optima were not related to age and social behaviour. NBO suggests the lack of overall familiar/unfamiliar-face attentional preference in middle infancy is explained by heterogeneous preferences, rather than a lack of preference within individual infants.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48392,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Developmental Science\",\"volume\":\"28 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/desc.13592\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Developmental Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/desc.13592\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Developmental Science","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/desc.13592","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

观察照料者的面孔对早期社交发展非常重要,在头 6 个月,对熟悉面孔和陌生面孔的注意神经相关性也会随之增加。然而,到 12 个月大时,大脑反应可能不会区分熟悉和陌生的面孔。传统的基于群体的分析并没有研究这些 "无效 "结果是由于婴儿个体确实缺乏偏好,还是婴儿群体对熟悉面孔和陌生面孔表现出强烈的个体偏好,但却存在差异。在一项预先注册的原理验证研究中,我们应用神经适应贝叶斯优化法(NBO)测试了婴儿个体对不同熟悉度面孔的神经反应有何不同。61 名 5-12 个月大的婴儿观看了由熟悉面孔(主要照顾者)逐渐变形为陌生面孔所产生的面孔。研究人员实时分析了来自前中央通道的脑电图(EEG)数据。每张脸出现后,计算负中心(Nc)事件相关电位(ERP)振幅。贝叶斯优化算法会反复选择下一个刺激,直到找出能激发该婴儿最强 Nc 的刺激为止。该研究的损耗率(15%)低于传统研究(22%)。虽然熟悉面孔与陌生面孔之间没有群体水平的 Nc 差异,但 85% 的儿童预测出了最佳值,这表明了个体水平的注意偏好。根据婴儿预测的最佳状态进行的传统分析证实,NBO 可以根据大脑激活情况识别亚组。最佳状态与年龄和社会行为无关。NBO表明,婴儿中期缺乏对熟悉/不熟悉面孔的整体注意偏好是由异质性偏好造成的,而不是婴儿个体缺乏偏好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Combining Real-Time Neuroimaging With Machine Learning to Study Attention to Familiar Faces During Infancy: A Proof of Principle Study

Combining Real-Time Neuroimaging With Machine Learning to Study Attention to Familiar Faces During Infancy: A Proof of Principle Study

Looking at caregivers’ faces is important for early social development, and there is a concomitant increase in neural correlates of attention to familiar versus novel faces in the first 6 months. However, by 12 months of age brain responses may not differentiate between familiar and unfamiliar faces. Traditional group-based analyses do not examine whether these ‘null’ findings stem from a true lack of preference within individual infants, or whether groups of infants show individually strong but heterogeneous preferences for familiar versus unfamiliar faces. In a preregistered proof-of-principle study, we applied Neuroadaptive Bayesian Optimisation (NBO) to test how individual infants’ neural responses vary across faces differing in familiarity. Sixty-one 5–12-month-olds viewed faces resulting from gradually morphing a familiar (primary caregiver) into an unfamiliar face. Electroencephalography (EEG) data from fronto-central channels were analysed in real-time. After the presentation of each face, the Negative central (Nc) event-related potential (ERP) amplitude was calculated. A Bayesian Optimisation algorithm iteratively selected the next stimulus until it identified the stimulus eliciting the strongest Nc for that infant. Attrition (15%) was lower than in traditional studies (22%). Although there was no group-level Nc-difference between familiar versus unfamiliar faces, an optimum was predicted in 85% of the children, indicating individual-level attentional preferences. Traditional analyses based on infants’ predicted optimum confirmed NBO can identify subgroups based on brain activation. Optima were not related to age and social behaviour. NBO suggests the lack of overall familiar/unfamiliar-face attentional preference in middle infancy is explained by heterogeneous preferences, rather than a lack of preference within individual infants.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
8.10%
发文量
132
期刊介绍: Developmental Science publishes cutting-edge theory and up-to-the-minute research on scientific developmental psychology from leading thinkers in the field. It is currently the only journal that specifically focuses on human developmental cognitive neuroscience. Coverage includes: - Clinical, computational and comparative approaches to development - Key advances in cognitive and social development - Developmental cognitive neuroscience - Functional neuroimaging of the developing brain
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信