少数群体包容性机构是否会增加激进右翼政党的选举支持?

IF 3.2 2区 社会学 Q1 SOCIOLOGY
Taishi Muraoka
{"title":"少数群体包容性机构是否会增加激进右翼政党的选举支持?","authors":"Taishi Muraoka","doi":"10.1016/j.ssresearch.2024.103115","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>How do minority inclusive institutions that improve minority groups’ political access influence the electoral success of radical-right, anti-minority parties? I explore this question by analyzing the case of Croatia’s national minority councils, which were introduced to enhance ethnic minorities’ political voices at the local level. Using a difference-in-differences design with panel data, I find that the vote shares of radical-right parties became lower, if anything, in municipalities with a minority council. Further, analyzing georeferenced survey data, I show that the introduction of minority councils did not necessarily worsen the ethnic majority’s attitudes toward minority groups. These findings indicate that contrary to the institutional variant of group threat theory, inclusive institutions do not have to trigger electoral backlash among people in the majority. This point has important implications for institution design in multiethnic societies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48338,"journal":{"name":"Social Science Research","volume":"126 ","pages":"Article 103115"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Do minority inclusive institutions increase electoral support for radical-right parties?\",\"authors\":\"Taishi Muraoka\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ssresearch.2024.103115\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>How do minority inclusive institutions that improve minority groups’ political access influence the electoral success of radical-right, anti-minority parties? I explore this question by analyzing the case of Croatia’s national minority councils, which were introduced to enhance ethnic minorities’ political voices at the local level. Using a difference-in-differences design with panel data, I find that the vote shares of radical-right parties became lower, if anything, in municipalities with a minority council. Further, analyzing georeferenced survey data, I show that the introduction of minority councils did not necessarily worsen the ethnic majority’s attitudes toward minority groups. These findings indicate that contrary to the institutional variant of group threat theory, inclusive institutions do not have to trigger electoral backlash among people in the majority. This point has important implications for institution design in multiethnic societies.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48338,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Social Science Research\",\"volume\":\"126 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103115\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Social Science Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0049089X24001376\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Science Research","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0049089X24001376","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

提高少数民族政治参与度的少数民族包容性机构如何影响激进右翼、反少数民族政党的选举成功?我通过分析克罗地亚国家少数民族委员会的案例来探讨这个问题,该委员会的引入是为了提高少数民族在地方层面的政治话语权。利用面板数据的差分设计,我发现激进右翼政党的得票率在设有少数民族委员会的市镇变得更低。此外,通过分析地理参照调查数据,我发现少数民族议会的引入并不一定会恶化多数民族对少数民族群体的态度。这些研究结果表明,与群体威胁理论的制度变体相反,包容性制度并不一定会引发多数人的选举反弹。这一点对多民族社会的制度设计具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Do minority inclusive institutions increase electoral support for radical-right parties?
How do minority inclusive institutions that improve minority groups’ political access influence the electoral success of radical-right, anti-minority parties? I explore this question by analyzing the case of Croatia’s national minority councils, which were introduced to enhance ethnic minorities’ political voices at the local level. Using a difference-in-differences design with panel data, I find that the vote shares of radical-right parties became lower, if anything, in municipalities with a minority council. Further, analyzing georeferenced survey data, I show that the introduction of minority councils did not necessarily worsen the ethnic majority’s attitudes toward minority groups. These findings indicate that contrary to the institutional variant of group threat theory, inclusive institutions do not have to trigger electoral backlash among people in the majority. This point has important implications for institution design in multiethnic societies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
4.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
65 days
期刊介绍: Social Science Research publishes papers devoted to quantitative social science research and methodology. The journal features articles that illustrate the use of quantitative methods in the empirical solution of substantive problems, and emphasizes those concerned with issues or methods that cut across traditional disciplinary lines. Special attention is given to methods that have been used by only one particular social science discipline, but that may have application to a broader range of areas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信