隧道的抗震性能和 2023 年卡赫拉曼马拉什地震现有地震风险模型的验证

IF 6.7 1区 工程技术 Q1 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY
Stefania Apostolaki , Servet Karahan , Evi Riga , Grigorios Tsinidis , Candan Gokceoglu , Kyriazis Pitilakis
{"title":"隧道的抗震性能和 2023 年卡赫拉曼马拉什地震现有地震风险模型的验证","authors":"Stefania Apostolaki ,&nbsp;Servet Karahan ,&nbsp;Evi Riga ,&nbsp;Grigorios Tsinidis ,&nbsp;Candan Gokceoglu ,&nbsp;Kyriazis Pitilakis","doi":"10.1016/j.tust.2024.106185","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The Kahramanmaraş earthquake sequence of February 6, 2023, has provided an opportunity to investigate the seismic performance of tunnels under very strong ground motions. The field survey conducted following the events revealed limited damages to the tunnels in the affected region despite the very high recorded ground motions. It is therefore important first to examine the reasons for these limited damages and then to investigate whether the available state of the art methods and tools for the seismic risk assessment of tunnels could have predicted this behaviour. The paper examines the response of 87 tunnels of various typologies and periods of construction, located in the provinces most affected by the two main events of the seismic sequence, with emphasis on the influencing factors like their structural and geotechnical characteristics, as well as their location with respect to the faults and the amplitudes of the ground motion. To assess and investigate the repeatability of the experienced PGA values of the two events at the tunnel sites, the Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Analysis (PSHA) was employed. A significant degree of variability is observed compared to the recorded motions, which is attributed to local site conditions, near-field and rupture directivity effects, parameters which cannot be captured ideally in all cases. Then, scenario-type risk analyses were performed using the USGS ShakeMaps of the two earthquakes and various established fragility models to describe the vulnerability of the tunnels. The estimated damage levels are compared with the actually observed damages, enhancing an extensive discussion on the capability of the existing models to provide reliable assessments of the expected damages in case of strong ground motions. The study underscores the complexity of assessing the seismic performance and risk of spatially extended underground structures and the importance of robust modelling approaches in enhancing the understanding of tunnel vulnerability and resilience in seismic events.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49414,"journal":{"name":"Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology","volume":"156 ","pages":"Article 106185"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Seismic performance of tunnels and verification of available seismic risk models for the 2023 Kahramanmaraş earthquakes\",\"authors\":\"Stefania Apostolaki ,&nbsp;Servet Karahan ,&nbsp;Evi Riga ,&nbsp;Grigorios Tsinidis ,&nbsp;Candan Gokceoglu ,&nbsp;Kyriazis Pitilakis\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.tust.2024.106185\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The Kahramanmaraş earthquake sequence of February 6, 2023, has provided an opportunity to investigate the seismic performance of tunnels under very strong ground motions. The field survey conducted following the events revealed limited damages to the tunnels in the affected region despite the very high recorded ground motions. It is therefore important first to examine the reasons for these limited damages and then to investigate whether the available state of the art methods and tools for the seismic risk assessment of tunnels could have predicted this behaviour. The paper examines the response of 87 tunnels of various typologies and periods of construction, located in the provinces most affected by the two main events of the seismic sequence, with emphasis on the influencing factors like their structural and geotechnical characteristics, as well as their location with respect to the faults and the amplitudes of the ground motion. To assess and investigate the repeatability of the experienced PGA values of the two events at the tunnel sites, the Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Analysis (PSHA) was employed. A significant degree of variability is observed compared to the recorded motions, which is attributed to local site conditions, near-field and rupture directivity effects, parameters which cannot be captured ideally in all cases. Then, scenario-type risk analyses were performed using the USGS ShakeMaps of the two earthquakes and various established fragility models to describe the vulnerability of the tunnels. The estimated damage levels are compared with the actually observed damages, enhancing an extensive discussion on the capability of the existing models to provide reliable assessments of the expected damages in case of strong ground motions. The study underscores the complexity of assessing the seismic performance and risk of spatially extended underground structures and the importance of robust modelling approaches in enhancing the understanding of tunnel vulnerability and resilience in seismic events.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49414,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology\",\"volume\":\"156 \",\"pages\":\"Article 106185\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0886779824006035\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0886779824006035","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

2023 年 2 月 6 日发生的卡赫拉曼马拉什(Kahramanmaraş)地震序列为研究隧道在极强地面运动下的抗震性能提供了机会。地震发生后进行的实地调查显示,尽管记录到的地面运动非常强烈,但受影响地区的隧道受到的破坏有限。因此,首先必须研究造成这些有限破坏的原因,然后调查现有的隧道地震风险评估方法和工具是否能够预测这种行为。本文研究了 87 座不同类型和建造时期的隧道的反应,这些隧道位于受地震序列中两个主要事件影响最严重的省份,重点研究了影响因素,如隧道的结构和岩土特性,以及隧道与断层和地面运动振幅之间的位置关系。为了评估和研究隧道所在地两次地震的 PGA 值的可重复性,采用了概率地震危害分析法(PSHA)。与记录的地震运动相比,观察到了很大程度的可变性,这归因于当地的场地条件、近场和破裂指向性效应,这些参数不可能在所有情况下都能理想地捕捉到。然后,利用这两次地震的 USGS ShakeMaps 和各种已建立的脆性模型进行了情景类风险分析,以描述隧道的脆弱性。将估算的破坏程度与实际观测到的破坏程度进行了比较,并对现有模型在强地面运动情况下提供可靠的预期破坏评估的能力进行了广泛讨论。这项研究强调了评估空间扩展的地下结构的抗震性能和风险的复杂性,以及稳健的建模方法在提高对隧道在地震事件中的脆弱性和抗灾能力的认识方面的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Seismic performance of tunnels and verification of available seismic risk models for the 2023 Kahramanmaraş earthquakes
The Kahramanmaraş earthquake sequence of February 6, 2023, has provided an opportunity to investigate the seismic performance of tunnels under very strong ground motions. The field survey conducted following the events revealed limited damages to the tunnels in the affected region despite the very high recorded ground motions. It is therefore important first to examine the reasons for these limited damages and then to investigate whether the available state of the art methods and tools for the seismic risk assessment of tunnels could have predicted this behaviour. The paper examines the response of 87 tunnels of various typologies and periods of construction, located in the provinces most affected by the two main events of the seismic sequence, with emphasis on the influencing factors like their structural and geotechnical characteristics, as well as their location with respect to the faults and the amplitudes of the ground motion. To assess and investigate the repeatability of the experienced PGA values of the two events at the tunnel sites, the Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Analysis (PSHA) was employed. A significant degree of variability is observed compared to the recorded motions, which is attributed to local site conditions, near-field and rupture directivity effects, parameters which cannot be captured ideally in all cases. Then, scenario-type risk analyses were performed using the USGS ShakeMaps of the two earthquakes and various established fragility models to describe the vulnerability of the tunnels. The estimated damage levels are compared with the actually observed damages, enhancing an extensive discussion on the capability of the existing models to provide reliable assessments of the expected damages in case of strong ground motions. The study underscores the complexity of assessing the seismic performance and risk of spatially extended underground structures and the importance of robust modelling approaches in enhancing the understanding of tunnel vulnerability and resilience in seismic events.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology
Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology 工程技术-工程:土木
CiteScore
11.90
自引率
18.80%
发文量
454
审稿时长
10.8 months
期刊介绍: Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology is an international journal which publishes authoritative articles encompassing the development of innovative uses of underground space and the results of high quality research into improved, more cost-effective techniques for the planning, geo-investigation, design, construction, operation and maintenance of underground and earth-sheltered structures. The journal provides an effective vehicle for the improved worldwide exchange of information on developments in underground technology - and the experience gained from its use - and is strongly committed to publishing papers on the interdisciplinary aspects of creating, planning, and regulating underground space.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信