评估变压吸附装置中二氧化碳/四氯化碳分离吸附剂的性能:综述

IF 7.4 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL
Luis Paz , Solène Gentil , Vanessa Fierro , Alain Celzard
{"title":"评估变压吸附装置中二氧化碳/四氯化碳分离吸附剂的性能:综述","authors":"Luis Paz ,&nbsp;Solène Gentil ,&nbsp;Vanessa Fierro ,&nbsp;Alain Celzard","doi":"10.1016/j.jece.2024.114870","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This review article assesses the performance of various adsorbents for CO<sub>2</sub>/CH<sub>4</sub> separation, a critical step in the final phase of a biogas upgrading plant. The focus is particularly on the use of pressure swing adsorption (PSA) units for this purpose. Four types of adsorbents, including activated carbons (ACs), carbon molecular sieves, metal organic frameworks, and zeolites, are thus evaluated based on their selectivity in CO<sub>2</sub>/CH<sub>4</sub> separation and PSA working capacity ratio. This selectivity is estimated from pure component isotherms through the Ideal Adsorbed Solution Theory (IAST), and the PSA working capacity ratio is evaluated for a PSA cycle with depressurization at atmospheric and sub-atmospheric pressure. The results show that ACs exhibit the lowest selectivity, while zeolites have the highest selectivity and PSA working capacity ratio. The article also includes a review of simulation studies on CO<sub>2</sub>/CH<sub>4</sub> separation by PSA. In addition, PSA units are compared based on their productivity, energy consumption, purity, and recovery. To calculate energy consumption and productivity, parameters that are often overlooked, a mass balance is applied to the PSA cycle described in each relevant literature study. Our study suggests that the PSA cycle with pressure equalization and sub-atmospheric pressure depressurization is the most optimal, providing valuable insights into the selection and optimization of adsorbents and PSA units for CO<sub>2</sub>/CH<sub>4</sub> separation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15759,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering","volume":"12 6","pages":"Article 114870"},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing the performance of adsorbents for CO2/CH4 separation in pressure swing adsorption units: A review\",\"authors\":\"Luis Paz ,&nbsp;Solène Gentil ,&nbsp;Vanessa Fierro ,&nbsp;Alain Celzard\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jece.2024.114870\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This review article assesses the performance of various adsorbents for CO<sub>2</sub>/CH<sub>4</sub> separation, a critical step in the final phase of a biogas upgrading plant. The focus is particularly on the use of pressure swing adsorption (PSA) units for this purpose. Four types of adsorbents, including activated carbons (ACs), carbon molecular sieves, metal organic frameworks, and zeolites, are thus evaluated based on their selectivity in CO<sub>2</sub>/CH<sub>4</sub> separation and PSA working capacity ratio. This selectivity is estimated from pure component isotherms through the Ideal Adsorbed Solution Theory (IAST), and the PSA working capacity ratio is evaluated for a PSA cycle with depressurization at atmospheric and sub-atmospheric pressure. The results show that ACs exhibit the lowest selectivity, while zeolites have the highest selectivity and PSA working capacity ratio. The article also includes a review of simulation studies on CO<sub>2</sub>/CH<sub>4</sub> separation by PSA. In addition, PSA units are compared based on their productivity, energy consumption, purity, and recovery. To calculate energy consumption and productivity, parameters that are often overlooked, a mass balance is applied to the PSA cycle described in each relevant literature study. Our study suggests that the PSA cycle with pressure equalization and sub-atmospheric pressure depressurization is the most optimal, providing valuable insights into the selection and optimization of adsorbents and PSA units for CO<sub>2</sub>/CH<sub>4</sub> separation.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15759,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering\",\"volume\":\"12 6\",\"pages\":\"Article 114870\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213343724030021\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213343724030021","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本综述文章评估了各种吸附剂在 CO2/CH4 分离方面的性能,这是沼气升级工厂最后阶段的关键步骤。重点尤其放在变压吸附 (PSA) 装置的使用上。因此,根据四种吸附剂(包括活性炭 (AC)、碳分子筛、金属有机框架和沸石)在 CO2/CH4 分离中的选择性和 PSA 工作容量比,对它们进行了评估。这种选择性是通过理想吸附溶液理论(IAST)从纯组分等温线中估算出来的,而 PSA 工作容量比则是在大气压和次大气压下进行减压的 PSA 循环中评估出来的。结果表明,AC 的选择性最低,而沸石的选择性和 PSA 工作容量比最高。文章还回顾了利用 PSA 分离 CO2/CH4 的模拟研究。此外,还根据生产率、能耗、纯度和回收率对 PSA 装置进行了比较。为了计算能耗和生产率这些经常被忽视的参数,我们对每篇相关文献研究中描述的 PSA 循环进行了质量平衡。我们的研究表明,具有压力均衡和亚大气压减压功能的 PSA 循环是最理想的,这为选择和优化用于二氧化碳/CH4 分离的吸附剂和 PSA 装置提供了宝贵的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Assessing the performance of adsorbents for CO2/CH4 separation in pressure swing adsorption units: A review

Assessing the performance of adsorbents for CO2/CH4 separation in pressure swing adsorption units: A review
This review article assesses the performance of various adsorbents for CO2/CH4 separation, a critical step in the final phase of a biogas upgrading plant. The focus is particularly on the use of pressure swing adsorption (PSA) units for this purpose. Four types of adsorbents, including activated carbons (ACs), carbon molecular sieves, metal organic frameworks, and zeolites, are thus evaluated based on their selectivity in CO2/CH4 separation and PSA working capacity ratio. This selectivity is estimated from pure component isotherms through the Ideal Adsorbed Solution Theory (IAST), and the PSA working capacity ratio is evaluated for a PSA cycle with depressurization at atmospheric and sub-atmospheric pressure. The results show that ACs exhibit the lowest selectivity, while zeolites have the highest selectivity and PSA working capacity ratio. The article also includes a review of simulation studies on CO2/CH4 separation by PSA. In addition, PSA units are compared based on their productivity, energy consumption, purity, and recovery. To calculate energy consumption and productivity, parameters that are often overlooked, a mass balance is applied to the PSA cycle described in each relevant literature study. Our study suggests that the PSA cycle with pressure equalization and sub-atmospheric pressure depressurization is the most optimal, providing valuable insights into the selection and optimization of adsorbents and PSA units for CO2/CH4 separation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering
Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering Environmental Science-Pollution
CiteScore
11.40
自引率
6.50%
发文量
2017
审稿时长
27 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering (JECE) serves as a platform for the dissemination of original and innovative research focusing on the advancement of environmentally-friendly, sustainable technologies. JECE emphasizes the transition towards a carbon-neutral circular economy and a self-sufficient bio-based economy. Topics covered include soil, water, wastewater, and air decontamination; pollution monitoring, prevention, and control; advanced analytics, sensors, impact and risk assessment methodologies in environmental chemical engineering; resource recovery (water, nutrients, materials, energy); industrial ecology; valorization of waste streams; waste management (including e-waste); climate-water-energy-food nexus; novel materials for environmental, chemical, and energy applications; sustainability and environmental safety; water digitalization, water data science, and machine learning; process integration and intensification; recent developments in green chemistry for synthesis, catalysis, and energy; and original research on contaminants of emerging concern, persistent chemicals, and priority substances, including microplastics, nanoplastics, nanomaterials, micropollutants, antimicrobial resistance genes, and emerging pathogens (viruses, bacteria, parasites) of environmental significance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信