伴有无症状骨髓瘤的轻链淀粉样变性(CRAB-SLiM特征):临床特征、细胞遗传学异常和预后。

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Chenqi Yu, Jing Li, Tianhong Xu, Wenjing Wang, Yang Yang, Chi Zhou, Pu Wang, Peng Liu
{"title":"伴有无症状骨髓瘤的轻链淀粉样变性(CRAB-SLiM特征):临床特征、细胞遗传学异常和预后。","authors":"Chenqi Yu, Jing Li, Tianhong Xu, Wenjing Wang, Yang Yang, Chi Zhou, Pu Wang, Peng Liu","doi":"10.1186/s12885-024-13219-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients with light-chain (AL) amyloidosis and concomitant multiple myeloma (MM) are known to have a worse prognosis, while the prognostic implication of cytogenetic abnormalities (CA) and optimal treatment schemes are not well-established. By comparing patients with MM or AL amyloidosis (AL) alone, this study aimed to evaluate the clinical characteristics, CA, and outcomes of patients with AL amyloidosis and concomitant symptomatic MM (MM-AL) and sought to provide evidence for their management.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In total, 915 consecutive patients with newly diagnosed AL amyloidosis or MM were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were classified as MM-alone, MM-AL or AL-alone. The presence of symptomatic MM was based on the International Myeloma Working Group criteria, and the diagnosis of AL amyloidosis was confirmed by Congo-red-positive biopsy and immunoelectron microscopy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 915 patients, 658, 106, and 151 were in the MM-alone group, MM-AL group, and AL-alone group, respectively. The three groups shared a similar incidence rate of CA, while the prevalence of t(11;14) was significantly higher in the AL-alone group than in the MM-AL and MM-alone group (40.7% vs. 25.7% vs. 16.6%, p < 0.001), and the prevalence of del13q, gain1q21 and high-risk CA (HRCA) decrease in turn in MM-alone, MM-AL and AL-alone group (del13q, 46.5% vs. 39.4% vs. 28.5%, p < 0.001; gain1q21, 52.6% vs. 45.2% vs. 27.3%, p < 0.001; HRCA, 27.5% vs. 16.0 vs. 7.3%, p < 0.001). The progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of MM-AL patients (median, 12.8, and 25.2 months) were significantly inferior to patients with MM-alone and AL-alone. No significant difference in PFS and OS was found between MM-AL patients with and without HRCA. When stratified by the type of plasma cell disease and status of t(11;14), patients with MM-AL and t(11;14) presented the worst OS (median, 8.2 months, p < 0.001). Regarding the management of MM-AL, extended cycles of induction therapy and the use of maintenance therapy contributed to a better prognosis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There was an apparent discrepancy in the distribution and prognostic implication of CA among different plasma cell diseases. Patients with MM-AL had the worst clinical outcomes, requiring extended duration of induction therapy and maintenance therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":9131,"journal":{"name":"BMC Cancer","volume":"24 1","pages":"1449"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11587578/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Light-chain amyloidosis with concomitant symptomatic myeloma (CRAB-SLiM features): clinical characteristics, cytogenetic abnormalities, and outcomes.\",\"authors\":\"Chenqi Yu, Jing Li, Tianhong Xu, Wenjing Wang, Yang Yang, Chi Zhou, Pu Wang, Peng Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12885-024-13219-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients with light-chain (AL) amyloidosis and concomitant multiple myeloma (MM) are known to have a worse prognosis, while the prognostic implication of cytogenetic abnormalities (CA) and optimal treatment schemes are not well-established. By comparing patients with MM or AL amyloidosis (AL) alone, this study aimed to evaluate the clinical characteristics, CA, and outcomes of patients with AL amyloidosis and concomitant symptomatic MM (MM-AL) and sought to provide evidence for their management.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In total, 915 consecutive patients with newly diagnosed AL amyloidosis or MM were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were classified as MM-alone, MM-AL or AL-alone. The presence of symptomatic MM was based on the International Myeloma Working Group criteria, and the diagnosis of AL amyloidosis was confirmed by Congo-red-positive biopsy and immunoelectron microscopy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 915 patients, 658, 106, and 151 were in the MM-alone group, MM-AL group, and AL-alone group, respectively. The three groups shared a similar incidence rate of CA, while the prevalence of t(11;14) was significantly higher in the AL-alone group than in the MM-AL and MM-alone group (40.7% vs. 25.7% vs. 16.6%, p < 0.001), and the prevalence of del13q, gain1q21 and high-risk CA (HRCA) decrease in turn in MM-alone, MM-AL and AL-alone group (del13q, 46.5% vs. 39.4% vs. 28.5%, p < 0.001; gain1q21, 52.6% vs. 45.2% vs. 27.3%, p < 0.001; HRCA, 27.5% vs. 16.0 vs. 7.3%, p < 0.001). The progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of MM-AL patients (median, 12.8, and 25.2 months) were significantly inferior to patients with MM-alone and AL-alone. No significant difference in PFS and OS was found between MM-AL patients with and without HRCA. When stratified by the type of plasma cell disease and status of t(11;14), patients with MM-AL and t(11;14) presented the worst OS (median, 8.2 months, p < 0.001). Regarding the management of MM-AL, extended cycles of induction therapy and the use of maintenance therapy contributed to a better prognosis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There was an apparent discrepancy in the distribution and prognostic implication of CA among different plasma cell diseases. Patients with MM-AL had the worst clinical outcomes, requiring extended duration of induction therapy and maintenance therapy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9131,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Cancer\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"1449\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11587578/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Cancer\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-024-13219-0\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-024-13219-0","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:众所周知,轻链(AL)淀粉样变性合并多发性骨髓瘤(MM)的患者预后较差,而细胞遗传学异常(CA)对预后的影响和最佳治疗方案尚未明确。本研究旨在通过比较MM或单纯AL淀粉样变性(AL)患者,评估AL淀粉样变性和伴有症状的MM(MM-AL)患者的临床特征、CA和预后,并试图为其治疗提供证据:回顾性分析了915例新确诊的AL淀粉样变性或MM患者。患者被分为单发 MM、MM-AL 或单发 AL。有症状的MM根据国际骨髓瘤工作组的标准确定,AL淀粉样变性的诊断则通过刚果红阳性活检和免疫电镜检查来确认:在915名患者中,MM-单纯组、MM-AL组和AL-单纯组分别有658人、106人和151人。三组的CA发病率相似,但AL-单药组的t(11;14)发病率明显高于MM-AL组和MM-单药组(40.7% vs. 25.7% vs. 16.6%,P 结论:MM-单药组、MM-AL组和AL-单药组的CA发病率明显高于MM-单药组(40.7% vs. 25.7% vs. 16.6%,P 结论):CA在不同浆细胞疾病中的分布和预后影响存在明显差异。MM-AL患者的临床预后最差,需要延长诱导治疗和维持治疗的时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Light-chain amyloidosis with concomitant symptomatic myeloma (CRAB-SLiM features): clinical characteristics, cytogenetic abnormalities, and outcomes.

Background: Patients with light-chain (AL) amyloidosis and concomitant multiple myeloma (MM) are known to have a worse prognosis, while the prognostic implication of cytogenetic abnormalities (CA) and optimal treatment schemes are not well-established. By comparing patients with MM or AL amyloidosis (AL) alone, this study aimed to evaluate the clinical characteristics, CA, and outcomes of patients with AL amyloidosis and concomitant symptomatic MM (MM-AL) and sought to provide evidence for their management.

Methods: In total, 915 consecutive patients with newly diagnosed AL amyloidosis or MM were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were classified as MM-alone, MM-AL or AL-alone. The presence of symptomatic MM was based on the International Myeloma Working Group criteria, and the diagnosis of AL amyloidosis was confirmed by Congo-red-positive biopsy and immunoelectron microscopy.

Results: Of 915 patients, 658, 106, and 151 were in the MM-alone group, MM-AL group, and AL-alone group, respectively. The three groups shared a similar incidence rate of CA, while the prevalence of t(11;14) was significantly higher in the AL-alone group than in the MM-AL and MM-alone group (40.7% vs. 25.7% vs. 16.6%, p < 0.001), and the prevalence of del13q, gain1q21 and high-risk CA (HRCA) decrease in turn in MM-alone, MM-AL and AL-alone group (del13q, 46.5% vs. 39.4% vs. 28.5%, p < 0.001; gain1q21, 52.6% vs. 45.2% vs. 27.3%, p < 0.001; HRCA, 27.5% vs. 16.0 vs. 7.3%, p < 0.001). The progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of MM-AL patients (median, 12.8, and 25.2 months) were significantly inferior to patients with MM-alone and AL-alone. No significant difference in PFS and OS was found between MM-AL patients with and without HRCA. When stratified by the type of plasma cell disease and status of t(11;14), patients with MM-AL and t(11;14) presented the worst OS (median, 8.2 months, p < 0.001). Regarding the management of MM-AL, extended cycles of induction therapy and the use of maintenance therapy contributed to a better prognosis.

Conclusions: There was an apparent discrepancy in the distribution and prognostic implication of CA among different plasma cell diseases. Patients with MM-AL had the worst clinical outcomes, requiring extended duration of induction therapy and maintenance therapy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Cancer
BMC Cancer 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
2.60%
发文量
1204
审稿时长
6.8 months
期刊介绍: BMC Cancer is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of cancer research, including the pathophysiology, prevention, diagnosis and treatment of cancers. The journal welcomes submissions concerning molecular and cellular biology, genetics, epidemiology, and clinical trials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信