多模态成像在诊断人工瓣膜和心内装置心内膜炎中的作用:综述。

Emmanuel Daniel, Mohammed El-Nayir, Chukwunonso Ezeani, Karldon Nwaezeapu, Oboseh John Ogedegbe, Misha Khan
{"title":"多模态成像在诊断人工瓣膜和心内装置心内膜炎中的作用:综述。","authors":"Emmanuel Daniel, Mohammed El-Nayir, Chukwunonso Ezeani, Karldon Nwaezeapu, Oboseh John Ogedegbe, Misha Khan","doi":"10.1007/s10554-024-03277-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Infective endocarditis (IE) is a severe cardiac condition associated with substantial morbidity and mortality. Traditionally, the modified Duke's criteria have been used to establish the diagnosis of IE, which includes using transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography. While echocardiography performs well in diagnosing native valve endocarditis, its diagnostic accuracy decreases in patients with prosthetic valves or implanted cardiac devices such as pacemakers and defibrillators. Given these limitations and advancements in cardiac imaging, including multimodal computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and positron emission tomography, there has been growing interest in the utility of these techniques for diagnosing prosthetic valve endocarditis (PVE) and Cardiovascular implantable electronic device infection (CIEDI). Although numerous studies have investigated the value of these imaging modalities, their findings have been inconsistent. This article aims to reevaluate the role of advanced imaging in diagnosing PVE and CIEDI and its impact on managing prosthetic valves and device-related infective endocarditis. Methods A comprehensive literature search was conducted in PubMed, Cochrane library, Google Scholar, Embase, and other relevant databases. Key terms such as 'infective endocarditis,' 'multimodal imaging,' 'prosthetic valve endocarditis,' '18F-FDG PET,' 'cardiac MRI,' and 'cardiac CT' were used to identify studies that investigated the role of these imaging modalities in diagnosing PVE and CIEDI. Publications with full text including randomized controlled trials, retrospective studies, case reports, case series, reviews of literature, and society guidelines were included.</p>","PeriodicalId":94227,"journal":{"name":"The international journal of cardiovascular imaging","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The role of multimodal imaging in the diagnosis of prosthetic valve and intracardiac device endocarditis: A review.\",\"authors\":\"Emmanuel Daniel, Mohammed El-Nayir, Chukwunonso Ezeani, Karldon Nwaezeapu, Oboseh John Ogedegbe, Misha Khan\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10554-024-03277-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Infective endocarditis (IE) is a severe cardiac condition associated with substantial morbidity and mortality. Traditionally, the modified Duke's criteria have been used to establish the diagnosis of IE, which includes using transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography. While echocardiography performs well in diagnosing native valve endocarditis, its diagnostic accuracy decreases in patients with prosthetic valves or implanted cardiac devices such as pacemakers and defibrillators. Given these limitations and advancements in cardiac imaging, including multimodal computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and positron emission tomography, there has been growing interest in the utility of these techniques for diagnosing prosthetic valve endocarditis (PVE) and Cardiovascular implantable electronic device infection (CIEDI). Although numerous studies have investigated the value of these imaging modalities, their findings have been inconsistent. This article aims to reevaluate the role of advanced imaging in diagnosing PVE and CIEDI and its impact on managing prosthetic valves and device-related infective endocarditis. Methods A comprehensive literature search was conducted in PubMed, Cochrane library, Google Scholar, Embase, and other relevant databases. Key terms such as 'infective endocarditis,' 'multimodal imaging,' 'prosthetic valve endocarditis,' '18F-FDG PET,' 'cardiac MRI,' and 'cardiac CT' were used to identify studies that investigated the role of these imaging modalities in diagnosing PVE and CIEDI. Publications with full text including randomized controlled trials, retrospective studies, case reports, case series, reviews of literature, and society guidelines were included.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94227,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The international journal of cardiovascular imaging\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The international journal of cardiovascular imaging\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-024-03277-7\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The international journal of cardiovascular imaging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-024-03277-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

感染性心内膜炎(IE)是一种严重的心脏疾病,发病率和死亡率都很高。传统上,IE 的诊断采用修改后的杜克标准,包括使用经胸和经食道超声心动图。虽然超声心动图在诊断原发瓣膜性心内膜炎方面表现良好,但对于人工瓣膜或植入心脏起搏器和除颤器等心脏设备的患者,其诊断准确性却有所下降。鉴于这些局限性以及多模态计算机断层扫描、磁共振成像和正电子发射断层扫描等心脏成像技术的进步,人们越来越关注这些技术在诊断人工瓣膜心内膜炎(PVE)和心血管植入式电子装置感染(CIEDI)方面的实用性。尽管许多研究都对这些成像模式的价值进行了调查,但结果并不一致。本文旨在重新评估先进成像技术在诊断 PVE 和 CIEDI 中的作用及其对人工瓣膜和设备相关感染性心内膜炎管理的影响。方法 在 PubMed、Cochrane 图书馆、Google Scholar、Embase 和其他相关数据库中进行了全面的文献检索。使用 "感染性心内膜炎"、"多模态成像"、"人工瓣膜心内膜炎"、"18F-FDG PET"、"心脏核磁共振成像 "和 "心脏 CT "等关键术语来确定调查这些成像模式在诊断 PVE 和 CIEDI 中作用的研究。全文包括随机对照试验、回顾性研究、病例报告、系列病例、文献综述和学会指南。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The role of multimodal imaging in the diagnosis of prosthetic valve and intracardiac device endocarditis: A review.

Infective endocarditis (IE) is a severe cardiac condition associated with substantial morbidity and mortality. Traditionally, the modified Duke's criteria have been used to establish the diagnosis of IE, which includes using transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography. While echocardiography performs well in diagnosing native valve endocarditis, its diagnostic accuracy decreases in patients with prosthetic valves or implanted cardiac devices such as pacemakers and defibrillators. Given these limitations and advancements in cardiac imaging, including multimodal computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and positron emission tomography, there has been growing interest in the utility of these techniques for diagnosing prosthetic valve endocarditis (PVE) and Cardiovascular implantable electronic device infection (CIEDI). Although numerous studies have investigated the value of these imaging modalities, their findings have been inconsistent. This article aims to reevaluate the role of advanced imaging in diagnosing PVE and CIEDI and its impact on managing prosthetic valves and device-related infective endocarditis. Methods A comprehensive literature search was conducted in PubMed, Cochrane library, Google Scholar, Embase, and other relevant databases. Key terms such as 'infective endocarditis,' 'multimodal imaging,' 'prosthetic valve endocarditis,' '18F-FDG PET,' 'cardiac MRI,' and 'cardiac CT' were used to identify studies that investigated the role of these imaging modalities in diagnosing PVE and CIEDI. Publications with full text including randomized controlled trials, retrospective studies, case reports, case series, reviews of literature, and society guidelines were included.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信