升主动脉长度与急性 A 型主动脉夹层的关系:回顾性队列研究

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q1 SURGERY
Tarmo Korpela, Elina Salomaa, Petteri Kauhanen, Tuomas Selander, Marja Hedman, Annastiina Husso
{"title":"升主动脉长度与急性 A 型主动脉夹层的关系:回顾性队列研究","authors":"Tarmo Korpela, Elina Salomaa, Petteri Kauhanen, Tuomas Selander, Marja Hedman, Annastiina Husso","doi":"10.1177/14574969241294261","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>To investigate whether, alongside aortic dilatation, ascending aortic (AA) elongation is associated with the increased risk for aortic dissection.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study included patients treated for Stanford type A aortic dissection (n = 102) in Kuopio University Hospital between 2009 and 2022, patients with AA dilatation (maximal diameter > 40 mm) (n = 134), and healthy controls (n = 191). AA length and dimensions were measured from aortic computed tomography angiography (CTA) images. AA length was defined as the distance between the aortic annulus and the origin of the brachiocephalic trunk.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After adjusting the AA length to the patients' age, height, body surface area (BSA), sex, and maximal diameter, the dissected aortas were 14 mm longer than in the healthy controls and 5 mm longer than in the dilated non-dissected aortas (p < 0.001). The dilated non-dissected aortas were 8 mm longer than in the healthy controls (p < 0.001). In the dissection cohort, 25/102 (25%) patients had maximal AA diameter < 55 mm and 16/102 (16%) patients had maximal AA diameter ⩾ 55 mm together with AA length > 110 mm. By combining 110 mm AA length and < 55 mm diameter, 58% of the dissection patients would have been identified instead of using solely AA diameter ⩾ 55 mm as a cut-off criterion, based on which only 33% patients met the indication for elective surgery.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>AA length seemed to have an association with acute type A dissection, and therefore, it could be an additional tool in identifying patients who may benefit from preventive aortic surgery.[Formula: see text].</p>","PeriodicalId":49566,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"14574969241294261"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Association of the ascending aortic length with acute type A aortic dissection: A retrospective cohort study.\",\"authors\":\"Tarmo Korpela, Elina Salomaa, Petteri Kauhanen, Tuomas Selander, Marja Hedman, Annastiina Husso\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/14574969241294261\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>To investigate whether, alongside aortic dilatation, ascending aortic (AA) elongation is associated with the increased risk for aortic dissection.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study included patients treated for Stanford type A aortic dissection (n = 102) in Kuopio University Hospital between 2009 and 2022, patients with AA dilatation (maximal diameter > 40 mm) (n = 134), and healthy controls (n = 191). AA length and dimensions were measured from aortic computed tomography angiography (CTA) images. AA length was defined as the distance between the aortic annulus and the origin of the brachiocephalic trunk.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After adjusting the AA length to the patients' age, height, body surface area (BSA), sex, and maximal diameter, the dissected aortas were 14 mm longer than in the healthy controls and 5 mm longer than in the dilated non-dissected aortas (p < 0.001). The dilated non-dissected aortas were 8 mm longer than in the healthy controls (p < 0.001). In the dissection cohort, 25/102 (25%) patients had maximal AA diameter < 55 mm and 16/102 (16%) patients had maximal AA diameter ⩾ 55 mm together with AA length > 110 mm. By combining 110 mm AA length and < 55 mm diameter, 58% of the dissection patients would have been identified instead of using solely AA diameter ⩾ 55 mm as a cut-off criterion, based on which only 33% patients met the indication for elective surgery.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>AA length seemed to have an association with acute type A dissection, and therefore, it could be an additional tool in identifying patients who may benefit from preventive aortic surgery.[Formula: see text].</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49566,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scandinavian Journal of Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"14574969241294261\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scandinavian Journal of Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/14574969241294261\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14574969241294261","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的研究主动脉扩张、升主动脉(AA)伸长是否与主动脉夹层风险增加有关:这项回顾性研究纳入了2009年至2022年间在库奥皮奥大学医院接受斯坦福A型主动脉夹层治疗的患者(102人)、AA扩张患者(最大直径大于40毫米)(134人)和健康对照组(191人)。AA的长度和尺寸是通过主动脉计算机断层扫描血管造影(CTA)图像测量的。AA长度定义为主动脉瓣环与肱动脉主干起源之间的距离:根据患者的年龄、身高、体表面积(BSA)、性别和最大直径调整 AA 长度后,解剖后的主动脉比健康对照组长 14 毫米,比扩张后未解剖的主动脉长 5 毫米(p 110 毫米)。将 110 毫米 AA 长度与结论相结合:AA长度似乎与急性A型主动脉夹层有关,因此,它可以作为一种额外的工具来识别可能从预防性主动脉手术中获益的患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Association of the ascending aortic length with acute type A aortic dissection: A retrospective cohort study.

Background and aims: To investigate whether, alongside aortic dilatation, ascending aortic (AA) elongation is associated with the increased risk for aortic dissection.

Methods: This retrospective study included patients treated for Stanford type A aortic dissection (n = 102) in Kuopio University Hospital between 2009 and 2022, patients with AA dilatation (maximal diameter > 40 mm) (n = 134), and healthy controls (n = 191). AA length and dimensions were measured from aortic computed tomography angiography (CTA) images. AA length was defined as the distance between the aortic annulus and the origin of the brachiocephalic trunk.

Results: After adjusting the AA length to the patients' age, height, body surface area (BSA), sex, and maximal diameter, the dissected aortas were 14 mm longer than in the healthy controls and 5 mm longer than in the dilated non-dissected aortas (p < 0.001). The dilated non-dissected aortas were 8 mm longer than in the healthy controls (p < 0.001). In the dissection cohort, 25/102 (25%) patients had maximal AA diameter < 55 mm and 16/102 (16%) patients had maximal AA diameter ⩾ 55 mm together with AA length > 110 mm. By combining 110 mm AA length and < 55 mm diameter, 58% of the dissection patients would have been identified instead of using solely AA diameter ⩾ 55 mm as a cut-off criterion, based on which only 33% patients met the indication for elective surgery.

Conclusion: AA length seemed to have an association with acute type A dissection, and therefore, it could be an additional tool in identifying patients who may benefit from preventive aortic surgery.[Formula: see text].

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
4.20%
发文量
37
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Scandinavian Journal of Surgery (SJS) is the official peer reviewed journal of the Finnish Surgical Society and the Scandinavian Surgical Society. It publishes original and review articles from all surgical fields and specialties to reflect the interests of our diverse and international readership that consists of surgeons from all specialties and continents.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信