密西西比州堕胎客户支付堕胎护理费用和应对经济困难的策略。

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q4 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Whitney Arey, Klaira Lerma, Amanda Nagle, Gema Alemán, Kari White
{"title":"密西西比州堕胎客户支付堕胎护理费用和应对经济困难的策略。","authors":"Whitney Arey, Klaira Lerma, Amanda Nagle, Gema Alemán, Kari White","doi":"10.1353/hpu.2024.a943980","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Abortion clients who experience economic hardship face barriers paying for abortion care. Between September 2020 and June 2021, we conducted a facility-based survey with 211 abortion clients who obtained care in Mississippi, and 25 respondents completed in-depth interviews. We computed the frequency with which survey respondents used social network-based, agency-based, and individual strategies to pay for care and we employed thematic analysis to explore in-depth interviewees' decision-making and experiences with these strategies. Overall, 93% used at least one strategy to pay for their abortion: 62% sought help from social networks; 61% received assistance from abortion funds (non-profit organizations that help people pay for abortion care); and 47% relied on individual strategies, such as postponing routine expenses. Interviewees often noted it was difficult to use these strategies and doing so adversely affected their economic stability. These findings support the need for insurance coverage and expanded financial assistance for abortion seekers, particularly those now forced to travel following abortion bans.</p>","PeriodicalId":48101,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved","volume":"35 4","pages":"1113-1127"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mississippi Abortion Clients' Strategies to Pay for Abortion Care and Manage Economic Hardship.\",\"authors\":\"Whitney Arey, Klaira Lerma, Amanda Nagle, Gema Alemán, Kari White\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/hpu.2024.a943980\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Abortion clients who experience economic hardship face barriers paying for abortion care. Between September 2020 and June 2021, we conducted a facility-based survey with 211 abortion clients who obtained care in Mississippi, and 25 respondents completed in-depth interviews. We computed the frequency with which survey respondents used social network-based, agency-based, and individual strategies to pay for care and we employed thematic analysis to explore in-depth interviewees' decision-making and experiences with these strategies. Overall, 93% used at least one strategy to pay for their abortion: 62% sought help from social networks; 61% received assistance from abortion funds (non-profit organizations that help people pay for abortion care); and 47% relied on individual strategies, such as postponing routine expenses. Interviewees often noted it was difficult to use these strategies and doing so adversely affected their economic stability. These findings support the need for insurance coverage and expanded financial assistance for abortion seekers, particularly those now forced to travel following abortion bans.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48101,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved\",\"volume\":\"35 4\",\"pages\":\"1113-1127\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/hpu.2024.a943980\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/hpu.2024.a943980","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

经济困难的人工流产患者在支付人工流产护理费用方面面临障碍。2020 年 9 月至 2021 年 6 月期间,我们对密西西比州的 211 名人工流产患者进行了基于医疗机构的调查,并对 25 名受访者进行了深度访谈。我们计算了调查对象使用社会网络、机构和个人策略支付医疗费用的频率,并采用主题分析法探讨了深度访谈对象的决策和使用这些策略的经验。总体而言,93% 的受访者至少使用过一种支付人工流产费用的策略:62%的受访者寻求社会网络的帮助;61%的受访者从堕胎基金(帮助人们支付堕胎护理费用的非营利组织)获得援助;47%的受访者依靠个人策略,如推迟日常开支。受访者经常指出,使用这些策略很困难,而且这样做会对他们的经济稳定性产生不利影响。这些调查结果表明,有必要为寻求堕胎的人提供保险和更多的经济援助,尤其是那些现在因堕胎禁令而被迫旅行的人。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Mississippi Abortion Clients' Strategies to Pay for Abortion Care and Manage Economic Hardship.

Abortion clients who experience economic hardship face barriers paying for abortion care. Between September 2020 and June 2021, we conducted a facility-based survey with 211 abortion clients who obtained care in Mississippi, and 25 respondents completed in-depth interviews. We computed the frequency with which survey respondents used social network-based, agency-based, and individual strategies to pay for care and we employed thematic analysis to explore in-depth interviewees' decision-making and experiences with these strategies. Overall, 93% used at least one strategy to pay for their abortion: 62% sought help from social networks; 61% received assistance from abortion funds (non-profit organizations that help people pay for abortion care); and 47% relied on individual strategies, such as postponing routine expenses. Interviewees often noted it was difficult to use these strategies and doing so adversely affected their economic stability. These findings support the need for insurance coverage and expanded financial assistance for abortion seekers, particularly those now forced to travel following abortion bans.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
7.10%
发文量
154
期刊介绍: The journal has as its goal the dissemination of information on the health of, and health care for, low income and other medically underserved communities to health care practitioners, policy makers, and community leaders who are in a position to effect meaningful change. Issues dealt with include access to, quality of, and cost of health care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信