斯塔福德郡青少年特发性脊柱侧凸问卷(SQ-AIS)的开发和初步测试:内容和表面效度

IF 2.1 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Enza Leone, Nachiappan Chockalingam, Robert Needham, Aoife Healy, Nicola Eddison, Nikola Jevtic, Vinay Jasani
{"title":"斯塔福德郡青少年特发性脊柱侧凸问卷(SQ-AIS)的开发和初步测试:内容和表面效度","authors":"Enza Leone,&nbsp;Nachiappan Chockalingam,&nbsp;Robert Needham,&nbsp;Aoife Healy,&nbsp;Nicola Eddison,&nbsp;Nikola Jevtic,&nbsp;Vinay Jasani","doi":"10.1002/hsr2.70213","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (AIS) is a structural spinal deformity with implications for health-related quality of life (HR-QoL). The Scoliosis Research Society-22 revised (SRS-22r) questionnaire is the standard for HR-QoL assessment. However, studies have identified limitations with the SRS-22r, including content and face validity issues, reliability concerns, and language appropriateness. This study aimed to develop and validate a patient-reported questionnaire, the Staffordshire Questionnaire for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (SQ-AIS), to assess the impact of AIS on HR-QoL.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>The SQ-AIS comprises six domains: general health, pain, function/activity, self-image/appearance, mental health, and intervention. Individuals with AIS aged 10–19 years and clinicians from a range of countries with expertise in AIS contributed to the testing process. Face validity and clinical applicability were assessed using Likert scales, while content validity was evaluated through a categorical binary variable (yes/no).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Involving 8 AIS patients and 43 clinicians, face validity scores demonstrated an acceptable level of understanding (≥ 4/5) for both individuals with AIS and clinicians. Most individuals with AIS (85.71%) and clinicians (80.95%) affirmed that the questionnaire sufficiently covers various aspects of scoliosis, indicating a satisfactory level of content validity. Ratings for applicability to clinical practice indicated an acceptable level of practical relevance (≥ 4/5).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Discussion and Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>The SQ-AIS emerges as a valid and promising tool to overcome existing challenges in AIS-related outcome assessment. Pending further validation studies, the favorable reception from the international community of clinicians suggests its potential as a new benchmark for evaluating AIS impact on HR-QoL and monitoring scoliosis management.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":36518,"journal":{"name":"Health Science Reports","volume":"7 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/hsr2.70213","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development and Preliminary Testing of the Staffordshire Questionnaire for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (SQ-AIS): Content and Face Validity\",\"authors\":\"Enza Leone,&nbsp;Nachiappan Chockalingam,&nbsp;Robert Needham,&nbsp;Aoife Healy,&nbsp;Nicola Eddison,&nbsp;Nikola Jevtic,&nbsp;Vinay Jasani\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/hsr2.70213\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Introduction</h3>\\n \\n <p>Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (AIS) is a structural spinal deformity with implications for health-related quality of life (HR-QoL). The Scoliosis Research Society-22 revised (SRS-22r) questionnaire is the standard for HR-QoL assessment. However, studies have identified limitations with the SRS-22r, including content and face validity issues, reliability concerns, and language appropriateness. This study aimed to develop and validate a patient-reported questionnaire, the Staffordshire Questionnaire for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (SQ-AIS), to assess the impact of AIS on HR-QoL.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>The SQ-AIS comprises six domains: general health, pain, function/activity, self-image/appearance, mental health, and intervention. Individuals with AIS aged 10–19 years and clinicians from a range of countries with expertise in AIS contributed to the testing process. Face validity and clinical applicability were assessed using Likert scales, while content validity was evaluated through a categorical binary variable (yes/no).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Involving 8 AIS patients and 43 clinicians, face validity scores demonstrated an acceptable level of understanding (≥ 4/5) for both individuals with AIS and clinicians. Most individuals with AIS (85.71%) and clinicians (80.95%) affirmed that the questionnaire sufficiently covers various aspects of scoliosis, indicating a satisfactory level of content validity. Ratings for applicability to clinical practice indicated an acceptable level of practical relevance (≥ 4/5).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Discussion and Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>The SQ-AIS emerges as a valid and promising tool to overcome existing challenges in AIS-related outcome assessment. Pending further validation studies, the favorable reception from the international community of clinicians suggests its potential as a new benchmark for evaluating AIS impact on HR-QoL and monitoring scoliosis management.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36518,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Science Reports\",\"volume\":\"7 11\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/hsr2.70213\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Science Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hsr2.70213\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Science Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hsr2.70213","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言 青少年特发性脊柱侧凸(AIS)是一种结构性脊柱畸形,对健康相关生活质量(HR-QoL)有影响。脊柱侧弯研究协会-22修订版(SRS-22r)问卷是健康相关生活质量评估的标准。然而,研究发现了 SRS-22r 的局限性,包括内容和表面效度问题、可靠性问题和语言适当性问题。本研究旨在开发并验证患者报告问卷--斯塔福德郡青少年特发性脊柱侧凸问卷(SQ-AIS),以评估AIS对心率-QoL的影响。 方法 SQ-AIS 包括六个方面:一般健康、疼痛、功能/活动、自我形象/外观、心理健康和干预。年龄在 10-19 岁之间的 AIS 患者和来自多个国家的具有 AIS 专业知识的临床医生参与了测试过程。表面效度和临床适用性采用李克特量表进行评估,而内容效度则采用二元分类变量(是/否)进行评估。 结果 在 8 名 AIS 患者和 43 名临床医生的参与下,AIS 患者和临床医生的面效度得分均达到了可接受的理解水平(≥ 4/5)。大多数 AIS 患者(85.71%)和临床医生(80.95%)都认为问卷充分涵盖了脊柱侧凸的各个方面,表明问卷的内容效度令人满意。对临床实践适用性的评分表明实际相关性达到了可接受的水平(≥ 4/5)。 讨论与结论 SQ-AIS 是一种有效且有前途的工具,可用于克服 AIS 相关结果评估中的现有挑战。在进一步的验证研究之前,国际临床医生群体对该工具的好评表明,它有潜力成为评估AIS对心率-质量-生活影响和监测脊柱侧弯管理的新基准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Development and Preliminary Testing of the Staffordshire Questionnaire for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (SQ-AIS): Content and Face Validity

Development and Preliminary Testing of the Staffordshire Questionnaire for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (SQ-AIS): Content and Face Validity

Introduction

Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (AIS) is a structural spinal deformity with implications for health-related quality of life (HR-QoL). The Scoliosis Research Society-22 revised (SRS-22r) questionnaire is the standard for HR-QoL assessment. However, studies have identified limitations with the SRS-22r, including content and face validity issues, reliability concerns, and language appropriateness. This study aimed to develop and validate a patient-reported questionnaire, the Staffordshire Questionnaire for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (SQ-AIS), to assess the impact of AIS on HR-QoL.

Methods

The SQ-AIS comprises six domains: general health, pain, function/activity, self-image/appearance, mental health, and intervention. Individuals with AIS aged 10–19 years and clinicians from a range of countries with expertise in AIS contributed to the testing process. Face validity and clinical applicability were assessed using Likert scales, while content validity was evaluated through a categorical binary variable (yes/no).

Results

Involving 8 AIS patients and 43 clinicians, face validity scores demonstrated an acceptable level of understanding (≥ 4/5) for both individuals with AIS and clinicians. Most individuals with AIS (85.71%) and clinicians (80.95%) affirmed that the questionnaire sufficiently covers various aspects of scoliosis, indicating a satisfactory level of content validity. Ratings for applicability to clinical practice indicated an acceptable level of practical relevance (≥ 4/5).

Discussion and Conclusion

The SQ-AIS emerges as a valid and promising tool to overcome existing challenges in AIS-related outcome assessment. Pending further validation studies, the favorable reception from the international community of clinicians suggests its potential as a new benchmark for evaluating AIS impact on HR-QoL and monitoring scoliosis management.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Health Science Reports
Health Science Reports Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
458
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信