利用自组织图在磁共振成像引导下对阿尔茨海默病所致轻度痴呆患者进行聚类

Q4 Neuroscience
Kellen K. Petersen , Bhargav T. Nallapu , Richard B. Lipton , Ellen Grober , Ali Ezzati
{"title":"利用自组织图在磁共振成像引导下对阿尔茨海默病所致轻度痴呆患者进行聚类","authors":"Kellen K. Petersen ,&nbsp;Bhargav T. Nallapu ,&nbsp;Richard B. Lipton ,&nbsp;Ellen Grober ,&nbsp;Ali Ezzati","doi":"10.1016/j.ynirp.2024.100227","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a phenotypically and pathologically heterogenous neurodegenerative disorder. This heterogeneity can be studied and disentangled using data-driven clustering techniques.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We implemented a self-organizing map clustering algorithm on baseline volumetric MRI measures from nine brain regions of interest (ROIs) to cluster 1041 individuals enrolled in the placebo arm of the EXPEDITION3 trial. Volumetric MRI differences were compared among clusters. Demographics as well as baseline and longitudinal cognitive performance metrics were used to evaluate cluster characteristics.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Three distinct clusters, with an overall silhouette coefficient of 0.491, were identified based on MRI volumetrics. Cluster 1 (N = 400) had the largest baseline volumetric measures across all ROIs and the best cognitive performance at baseline. Cluster 2 (N = 269) had larger hippocampal and medial temporal lobe volumes, but smaller parietal lobe volumes in comparison with the third cluster (N = 372). Significant between-group mean differences were observed between Clusters 1 and 2 (difference, 2.38; 95% CI, 1.85 to 2.91; P &lt; 0.001), Clusters 1 and 3 (difference, 1.93; 95% CI, 1.41 to 2.44; P &lt; 0.001), but not between Clusters 2 and 3 (difference, 0.45; 95% CI, −0.11 to 1.02; P = 0.146) in ADAS-14.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Volumetric MRI can be used to identify homogenous clusters of amyloid positive individuals with mild dementia. The groups identified differ in baseline and longitudinal characteristics. Cluster 1 shows little ADAS-14 change over the first 40 weeks of study on placebo treatment and may be unsuitable for identifying early benefits of treatment.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":74277,"journal":{"name":"Neuroimage. Reports","volume":"4 4","pages":"Article 100227"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"MRI-guided clustering of patients with mild dementia due to Alzheimer's disease using self-organizing maps\",\"authors\":\"Kellen K. Petersen ,&nbsp;Bhargav T. Nallapu ,&nbsp;Richard B. Lipton ,&nbsp;Ellen Grober ,&nbsp;Ali Ezzati\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ynirp.2024.100227\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a phenotypically and pathologically heterogenous neurodegenerative disorder. This heterogeneity can be studied and disentangled using data-driven clustering techniques.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We implemented a self-organizing map clustering algorithm on baseline volumetric MRI measures from nine brain regions of interest (ROIs) to cluster 1041 individuals enrolled in the placebo arm of the EXPEDITION3 trial. Volumetric MRI differences were compared among clusters. Demographics as well as baseline and longitudinal cognitive performance metrics were used to evaluate cluster characteristics.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Three distinct clusters, with an overall silhouette coefficient of 0.491, were identified based on MRI volumetrics. Cluster 1 (N = 400) had the largest baseline volumetric measures across all ROIs and the best cognitive performance at baseline. Cluster 2 (N = 269) had larger hippocampal and medial temporal lobe volumes, but smaller parietal lobe volumes in comparison with the third cluster (N = 372). Significant between-group mean differences were observed between Clusters 1 and 2 (difference, 2.38; 95% CI, 1.85 to 2.91; P &lt; 0.001), Clusters 1 and 3 (difference, 1.93; 95% CI, 1.41 to 2.44; P &lt; 0.001), but not between Clusters 2 and 3 (difference, 0.45; 95% CI, −0.11 to 1.02; P = 0.146) in ADAS-14.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Volumetric MRI can be used to identify homogenous clusters of amyloid positive individuals with mild dementia. The groups identified differ in baseline and longitudinal characteristics. Cluster 1 shows little ADAS-14 change over the first 40 weeks of study on placebo treatment and may be unsuitable for identifying early benefits of treatment.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74277,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neuroimage. Reports\",\"volume\":\"4 4\",\"pages\":\"Article 100227\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neuroimage. Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666956024000333\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Neuroscience\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuroimage. Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666956024000333","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Neuroscience","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言阿尔茨海默病(AD)是一种表型和病理上异质性的神经退行性疾病。我们对来自九个大脑感兴趣区(ROIs)的基线容积 MRI 测量值实施了自组织图聚类算法,对参加 EXPEDITION3 试验安慰剂组的 1041 人进行了聚类。比较了聚类之间的磁共振成像容积差异。结果根据核磁共振成像的容积系数,确定了三个不同的群组,总体剪影系数为 0.491。群组 1(N = 400)所有 ROI 的基线容积测量值最大,基线认知表现最好。与第三组(N = 372)相比,第二组(N = 269)的海马和颞叶内侧体积较大,但顶叶体积较小。在第 1 组和第 2 组(差异为 2.38;95% CI,1.85 至 2.91;P <;0.001)、第 1 组和第 3 组(差异为 1.93;95% CI,1.41 至 2.44;P <;0.结论 超声核磁共振成像可用于识别淀粉样蛋白阳性的轻度痴呆患者的同质群。所确定的群组在基线和纵向特征方面存在差异。群组1在接受安慰剂治疗的前40周内ADAS-14变化不大,可能不适合用于识别治疗的早期益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
MRI-guided clustering of patients with mild dementia due to Alzheimer's disease using self-organizing maps

Introduction

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a phenotypically and pathologically heterogenous neurodegenerative disorder. This heterogeneity can be studied and disentangled using data-driven clustering techniques.

Methods

We implemented a self-organizing map clustering algorithm on baseline volumetric MRI measures from nine brain regions of interest (ROIs) to cluster 1041 individuals enrolled in the placebo arm of the EXPEDITION3 trial. Volumetric MRI differences were compared among clusters. Demographics as well as baseline and longitudinal cognitive performance metrics were used to evaluate cluster characteristics.

Results

Three distinct clusters, with an overall silhouette coefficient of 0.491, were identified based on MRI volumetrics. Cluster 1 (N = 400) had the largest baseline volumetric measures across all ROIs and the best cognitive performance at baseline. Cluster 2 (N = 269) had larger hippocampal and medial temporal lobe volumes, but smaller parietal lobe volumes in comparison with the third cluster (N = 372). Significant between-group mean differences were observed between Clusters 1 and 2 (difference, 2.38; 95% CI, 1.85 to 2.91; P < 0.001), Clusters 1 and 3 (difference, 1.93; 95% CI, 1.41 to 2.44; P < 0.001), but not between Clusters 2 and 3 (difference, 0.45; 95% CI, −0.11 to 1.02; P = 0.146) in ADAS-14.

Conclusions

Volumetric MRI can be used to identify homogenous clusters of amyloid positive individuals with mild dementia. The groups identified differ in baseline and longitudinal characteristics. Cluster 1 shows little ADAS-14 change over the first 40 weeks of study on placebo treatment and may be unsuitable for identifying early benefits of treatment.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Neuroimage. Reports
Neuroimage. Reports Neuroscience (General)
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
87 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信