电针对腹腔镜胆囊手术患者颈内动脉血流的影响:随机临床试验

IF 2.8 4区 医学 Q2 INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE
Lili Hu , Yongyan Zhang , Ying Li , Ruiping Wang , Hua Xu
{"title":"电针对腹腔镜胆囊手术患者颈内动脉血流的影响:随机临床试验","authors":"Lili Hu ,&nbsp;Yongyan Zhang ,&nbsp;Ying Li ,&nbsp;Ruiping Wang ,&nbsp;Hua Xu","doi":"10.1016/j.imr.2024.101097","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Little is known about the effect of electroacupuncture (EA) on cerebral blood flow. We investigated this question in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy, hypothesizing that EA would increase cerebral blood flow during surgery.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Eighty-two patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy were randomly divided into receiving electroacupuncture and intravenous anesthesia (EA+IA) and receving intravenous anesthesia alone (IA). The patients in EA+IA were treated with EA at Baihui (GV 20), Shuigou (GV 26), unilateral Neiguan (PC 6) and unilateral Zusanli (ST 36) points 20 min before anesthesia until the end of the operation. The patients in IA received intravenous anesthesia alone. The internal carotid artery blood flow (Q), mean arterial pressure (MAP), end-tidal carbon dioxide pressure (P<sub>ET</sub>CO<sub>2</sub>) and heart rate (HR) were recorded respectively before anesthesia induction (T<sub>1</sub>), 2 min after anesthesia induction (T<sub>2</sub>), 1 min after pneumoperitoneum (T<sub>3</sub>), 1 min after head-up tilt (T<sub>4</sub>) and after anesthesia resuscitation (T<sub>5</sub>).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The internal carotid artery blood flow was significantly higher in EA+IA (mean [SD], T<sub>3</sub>, 294.0 [89.6] ml min<sup>-1</sup>; T<sub>4</sub>, 303.8 [90.6] ml min<sup>-1</sup>) than in IA (mean [SD], T<sub>3</sub>, 246.4 [80.9] ml min<sup>-1</sup>; T4, 253.5 [78.4] ml min<sup>-1</sup>) at T<sub>3</sub> and T<sub>4</sub> (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.05). There was no difference in blood flow between the two groups at T<sub>2</sub> and T<sub>5</sub>. As compared with baseline (T<sub>1</sub>), the internal carotid artery blood flow decreased at T<sub>2</sub>-T<sub>4</sub> in two groups (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.05). There were no differences in MAP, P<sub>ET</sub>CO<sub>2</sub>, and HR between the two groups.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Electroacupuncture intervention could reduce the decline of internal carotid artery blood flow in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.</div></div><div><h3>Trial registration</h3><div>ChiCTR: 2,100,041,761.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":13644,"journal":{"name":"Integrative Medicine Research","volume":"13 4","pages":"Article 101097"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of electroacupuncture on internal carotid artery blood flow in patients undergoing laparoscopic gallbladder surgery: A randomized clinical trial\",\"authors\":\"Lili Hu ,&nbsp;Yongyan Zhang ,&nbsp;Ying Li ,&nbsp;Ruiping Wang ,&nbsp;Hua Xu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.imr.2024.101097\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Little is known about the effect of electroacupuncture (EA) on cerebral blood flow. We investigated this question in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy, hypothesizing that EA would increase cerebral blood flow during surgery.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Eighty-two patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy were randomly divided into receiving electroacupuncture and intravenous anesthesia (EA+IA) and receving intravenous anesthesia alone (IA). The patients in EA+IA were treated with EA at Baihui (GV 20), Shuigou (GV 26), unilateral Neiguan (PC 6) and unilateral Zusanli (ST 36) points 20 min before anesthesia until the end of the operation. The patients in IA received intravenous anesthesia alone. The internal carotid artery blood flow (Q), mean arterial pressure (MAP), end-tidal carbon dioxide pressure (P<sub>ET</sub>CO<sub>2</sub>) and heart rate (HR) were recorded respectively before anesthesia induction (T<sub>1</sub>), 2 min after anesthesia induction (T<sub>2</sub>), 1 min after pneumoperitoneum (T<sub>3</sub>), 1 min after head-up tilt (T<sub>4</sub>) and after anesthesia resuscitation (T<sub>5</sub>).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The internal carotid artery blood flow was significantly higher in EA+IA (mean [SD], T<sub>3</sub>, 294.0 [89.6] ml min<sup>-1</sup>; T<sub>4</sub>, 303.8 [90.6] ml min<sup>-1</sup>) than in IA (mean [SD], T<sub>3</sub>, 246.4 [80.9] ml min<sup>-1</sup>; T4, 253.5 [78.4] ml min<sup>-1</sup>) at T<sub>3</sub> and T<sub>4</sub> (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.05). There was no difference in blood flow between the two groups at T<sub>2</sub> and T<sub>5</sub>. As compared with baseline (T<sub>1</sub>), the internal carotid artery blood flow decreased at T<sub>2</sub>-T<sub>4</sub> in two groups (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.05). There were no differences in MAP, P<sub>ET</sub>CO<sub>2</sub>, and HR between the two groups.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Electroacupuncture intervention could reduce the decline of internal carotid artery blood flow in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.</div></div><div><h3>Trial registration</h3><div>ChiCTR: 2,100,041,761.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13644,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Integrative Medicine Research\",\"volume\":\"13 4\",\"pages\":\"Article 101097\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Integrative Medicine Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213422024000775\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Integrative Medicine Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213422024000775","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景人们对电针(EA)对脑血流的影响知之甚少。我们在接受腹腔镜胆囊切除术的患者中研究了这一问题,假设电针会增加手术中的脑血流量。方法将接受腹腔镜胆囊切除术的 82 名患者随机分为接受电针和静脉麻醉(EA+IA)和单独接受静脉麻醉(IA)。EA+IA患者在麻醉前20分钟在百会穴(GV 20)、水沟穴(GV 26)、单侧内关穴(PC 6)和单侧足三里穴(ST 36)进行电针治疗,直至手术结束。IA患者仅接受静脉麻醉。分别记录麻醉诱导前(T1)、麻醉诱导后2分钟(T2)、气腹后1分钟(T3)、仰头后1分钟(T4)和麻醉复苏后(T5)的颈内动脉血流(Q)、平均动脉压(MAP)、潮气末二氧化碳压力(PETCO2)和心率(HR)。结果 在T3和T4,EA+IA的颈内动脉血流(平均值[标度],T3,294.0 [89.6] ml min-1;T4,303.8 [90.6] ml min-1)明显高于IA(平均值[标度],T3,246.4 [80.9] ml min-1;T4,253.5 [78.4] ml min-1)(P <0.05)。两组在 T2 和 T5 时的血流量没有差异。与基线(T1)相比,两组颈内动脉血流在 T2-T4 均有所下降(P < 0.05)。结论电针干预可减少腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者颈内动脉血流的下降。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effect of electroacupuncture on internal carotid artery blood flow in patients undergoing laparoscopic gallbladder surgery: A randomized clinical trial

Background

Little is known about the effect of electroacupuncture (EA) on cerebral blood flow. We investigated this question in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy, hypothesizing that EA would increase cerebral blood flow during surgery.

Methods

Eighty-two patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy were randomly divided into receiving electroacupuncture and intravenous anesthesia (EA+IA) and receving intravenous anesthesia alone (IA). The patients in EA+IA were treated with EA at Baihui (GV 20), Shuigou (GV 26), unilateral Neiguan (PC 6) and unilateral Zusanli (ST 36) points 20 min before anesthesia until the end of the operation. The patients in IA received intravenous anesthesia alone. The internal carotid artery blood flow (Q), mean arterial pressure (MAP), end-tidal carbon dioxide pressure (PETCO2) and heart rate (HR) were recorded respectively before anesthesia induction (T1), 2 min after anesthesia induction (T2), 1 min after pneumoperitoneum (T3), 1 min after head-up tilt (T4) and after anesthesia resuscitation (T5).

Results

The internal carotid artery blood flow was significantly higher in EA+IA (mean [SD], T3, 294.0 [89.6] ml min-1; T4, 303.8 [90.6] ml min-1) than in IA (mean [SD], T3, 246.4 [80.9] ml min-1; T4, 253.5 [78.4] ml min-1) at T3 and T4 (P < 0.05). There was no difference in blood flow between the two groups at T2 and T5. As compared with baseline (T1), the internal carotid artery blood flow decreased at T2-T4 in two groups (P < 0.05). There were no differences in MAP, PETCO2, and HR between the two groups.

Conclusion

Electroacupuncture intervention could reduce the decline of internal carotid artery blood flow in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Trial registration

ChiCTR: 2,100,041,761.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Integrative Medicine Research
Integrative Medicine Research Medicine-Complementary and Alternative Medicine
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
2.90%
发文量
65
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Integrative Medicine Research (IMR) is a quarterly, peer-reviewed journal focused on scientific research for integrative medicine including traditional medicine (emphasis on acupuncture and herbal medicine), complementary and alternative medicine, and systems medicine. The journal includes papers on basic research, clinical research, methodology, theory, computational analysis and modelling, topical reviews, medical history, education and policy based on physiology, pathology, diagnosis and the systems approach in the field of integrative medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信