不同背景下成年人的共创经验:健康 CASCADE 范围审查

IF 3.9 3区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Lauren McCaffrey , Bryan McCann , Maria Giné-Garriga , Qingfan An , Greet Cardon , Sebastien François Martin Chastin , Rabab Chrifou , Sonia Lippke , Quentin Loisel , Giuliana Raffaella Longworth , Katrina Messiha , Mira Vogelsang , Emily Whyte , Philippa Margaret Dall
{"title":"不同背景下成年人的共创经验:健康 CASCADE 范围审查","authors":"Lauren McCaffrey ,&nbsp;Bryan McCann ,&nbsp;Maria Giné-Garriga ,&nbsp;Qingfan An ,&nbsp;Greet Cardon ,&nbsp;Sebastien François Martin Chastin ,&nbsp;Rabab Chrifou ,&nbsp;Sonia Lippke ,&nbsp;Quentin Loisel ,&nbsp;Giuliana Raffaella Longworth ,&nbsp;Katrina Messiha ,&nbsp;Mira Vogelsang ,&nbsp;Emily Whyte ,&nbsp;Philippa Margaret Dall","doi":"10.1016/j.puhe.2024.11.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>This scoping review aimed to summarise available evidence relating to co-creation experiences among adults in diverse contexts. Understanding how participation in co-creation processes shapes experiences is important as it can offer insights into the improved development and effective use of such processes. Co-creation has increasingly gained attention due to its many claimed advantages and benefits to participants. There is however a lack of aggregated literature on stakeholders’ experience of the co-creation process.</div></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><div>Scoping review.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Arksey and O'Malley's methodological framework for conducting scoping reviews was used. A systematic search was conducted in Scopus and the Health CASCADE Co-creation Database (an open access curated database of 13,501 articles, screened for inclusion based on criteria relating to co-creation participatory research). Themes were generated through thematic analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>We included 80 publications. Positive co-creation experiences were linked to establishing interpersonal relationships and positive group dynamics, enhanced well-being, personal development, satisfaction and fulfilment. Negative experiences were associated with initial uncertainties, project-related challenges, interpersonal issues, dissatisfaction, and disengagement.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This review offers insights into how co-creation shaped experiences and demonstrates the scope and characteristics of co-creation experiences. It highlights the need for further research, particularly in understanding the mechanisms underpinning and explaining experiences and in strategies for promoting positive experiences and mitigating negative experiences.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49651,"journal":{"name":"Public Health","volume":"238 ","pages":"Pages 29-36"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Co-creation experiences among adults in diverse contexts: A Health CASCADE scoping review\",\"authors\":\"Lauren McCaffrey ,&nbsp;Bryan McCann ,&nbsp;Maria Giné-Garriga ,&nbsp;Qingfan An ,&nbsp;Greet Cardon ,&nbsp;Sebastien François Martin Chastin ,&nbsp;Rabab Chrifou ,&nbsp;Sonia Lippke ,&nbsp;Quentin Loisel ,&nbsp;Giuliana Raffaella Longworth ,&nbsp;Katrina Messiha ,&nbsp;Mira Vogelsang ,&nbsp;Emily Whyte ,&nbsp;Philippa Margaret Dall\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.puhe.2024.11.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>This scoping review aimed to summarise available evidence relating to co-creation experiences among adults in diverse contexts. Understanding how participation in co-creation processes shapes experiences is important as it can offer insights into the improved development and effective use of such processes. Co-creation has increasingly gained attention due to its many claimed advantages and benefits to participants. There is however a lack of aggregated literature on stakeholders’ experience of the co-creation process.</div></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><div>Scoping review.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Arksey and O'Malley's methodological framework for conducting scoping reviews was used. A systematic search was conducted in Scopus and the Health CASCADE Co-creation Database (an open access curated database of 13,501 articles, screened for inclusion based on criteria relating to co-creation participatory research). Themes were generated through thematic analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>We included 80 publications. Positive co-creation experiences were linked to establishing interpersonal relationships and positive group dynamics, enhanced well-being, personal development, satisfaction and fulfilment. Negative experiences were associated with initial uncertainties, project-related challenges, interpersonal issues, dissatisfaction, and disengagement.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This review offers insights into how co-creation shaped experiences and demonstrates the scope and characteristics of co-creation experiences. It highlights the need for further research, particularly in understanding the mechanisms underpinning and explaining experiences and in strategies for promoting positive experiences and mitigating negative experiences.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49651,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Public Health\",\"volume\":\"238 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 29-36\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Public Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0033350624004591\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0033350624004591","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目标 本范围界定综述旨在总结与不同背景下成年人的共同创造体验有关的现有证据。了解参与共同创造过程是如何形成经验的非常重要,因为这可以为改进发展和有效利用此类过程提供启示。共同创造因其对参与者的诸多优势和好处而日益受到关注。研究设计范围界定综述。方法采用阿克西和奥马利的范围界定综述方法框架。在 Scopus 和健康 CASCADE 共同创造数据库(一个包含 13,501 篇文章的开放式数据库,根据共同创造参与式研究的相关标准筛选纳入文章)中进行了系统检索。结果我们收录了 80 篇出版物。积极的共同创造经验与建立人际关系和积极的群体动力、提高幸福感、个人发展、满意度和成就感有关。负面经验则与最初的不确定性、与项目相关的挑战、人际关系问题、不满意和脱离有关。它强调了进一步研究的必要性,特别是在理解支撑和解释体验的机制以及促进积极体验和减少消极体验的策略方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Co-creation experiences among adults in diverse contexts: A Health CASCADE scoping review

Objectives

This scoping review aimed to summarise available evidence relating to co-creation experiences among adults in diverse contexts. Understanding how participation in co-creation processes shapes experiences is important as it can offer insights into the improved development and effective use of such processes. Co-creation has increasingly gained attention due to its many claimed advantages and benefits to participants. There is however a lack of aggregated literature on stakeholders’ experience of the co-creation process.

Study design

Scoping review.

Methods

Arksey and O'Malley's methodological framework for conducting scoping reviews was used. A systematic search was conducted in Scopus and the Health CASCADE Co-creation Database (an open access curated database of 13,501 articles, screened for inclusion based on criteria relating to co-creation participatory research). Themes were generated through thematic analysis.

Results

We included 80 publications. Positive co-creation experiences were linked to establishing interpersonal relationships and positive group dynamics, enhanced well-being, personal development, satisfaction and fulfilment. Negative experiences were associated with initial uncertainties, project-related challenges, interpersonal issues, dissatisfaction, and disengagement.

Conclusion

This review offers insights into how co-creation shaped experiences and demonstrates the scope and characteristics of co-creation experiences. It highlights the need for further research, particularly in understanding the mechanisms underpinning and explaining experiences and in strategies for promoting positive experiences and mitigating negative experiences.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Public Health
Public Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
280
审稿时长
37 days
期刊介绍: Public Health is an international, multidisciplinary peer-reviewed journal. It publishes original papers, reviews and short reports on all aspects of the science, philosophy, and practice of public health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信