测试环境政策认可度的维度及其与环境态度和行为测量的趋同性。

IF 2.1 4区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL
Benedikt T. Seger, Franziska Baghestani, Gerhild Nieding
{"title":"测试环境政策认可度的维度及其与环境态度和行为测量的趋同性。","authors":"Benedikt T. Seger,&nbsp;Franziska Baghestani,&nbsp;Gerhild Nieding","doi":"10.1016/j.actpsy.2024.104613","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>It can be argued that environmental policy approval (EPA) is a key individual response to the global ecological crisis. This study explores EPA in two ways. First, we tested the dimensional structure of EPA applying confirmatory factor analysis to a newly constructed 24-item scale. Specifically, we analyzed a one-dimensional EPA model, a two-dimensional model that tells existing policies apart from claimed policies, a three-dimensional model that splits EPA into fields of action (energy, agriculture/nutrition, and mobility/transport), and a four-dimensional model that segments EPA into policy types (charges, regulations, infrastructure, and adaptation). Second, we examined the extent to which EPA can be regarded as a variant of environmental attitude or pro-environmental behavior by estimating the relationship of the EPA scale with established measures of environmental attitude and pro-environmental behavior via path analyses. The results (<em>N</em> = 276) indicate marginally superior fits for the three-factor fields-of-action model and the path model that describes EPA as a pro-environmental behavior. Our findings also suggest that EPA is particularly strongly predicted by affective environmental attitude.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7141,"journal":{"name":"Acta Psychologica","volume":"251 ","pages":"Article 104613"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Testing the dimensionality of environmental policy approval and its convergence with environmental attitude and behavior measures\",\"authors\":\"Benedikt T. Seger,&nbsp;Franziska Baghestani,&nbsp;Gerhild Nieding\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.actpsy.2024.104613\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>It can be argued that environmental policy approval (EPA) is a key individual response to the global ecological crisis. This study explores EPA in two ways. First, we tested the dimensional structure of EPA applying confirmatory factor analysis to a newly constructed 24-item scale. Specifically, we analyzed a one-dimensional EPA model, a two-dimensional model that tells existing policies apart from claimed policies, a three-dimensional model that splits EPA into fields of action (energy, agriculture/nutrition, and mobility/transport), and a four-dimensional model that segments EPA into policy types (charges, regulations, infrastructure, and adaptation). Second, we examined the extent to which EPA can be regarded as a variant of environmental attitude or pro-environmental behavior by estimating the relationship of the EPA scale with established measures of environmental attitude and pro-environmental behavior via path analyses. The results (<em>N</em> = 276) indicate marginally superior fits for the three-factor fields-of-action model and the path model that describes EPA as a pro-environmental behavior. Our findings also suggest that EPA is particularly strongly predicted by affective environmental attitude.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7141,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Psychologica\",\"volume\":\"251 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104613\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Psychologica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0001691824004918\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Psychologica","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0001691824004918","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

可以说,环境政策批准(EPA)是个人应对全球生态危机的关键措施。本研究从两个方面探讨了 EPA。首先,我们对新构建的 24 个项目的量表进行了确证因子分析,检验了 EPA 的维度结构。具体来说,我们分析了一维 EPA 模型、将现有政策与主张的政策区分开来的二维模型、将 EPA 划分为行动领域(能源、农业/营养和流动性/运输)的三维模型,以及将 EPA 划分为政策类型(收费、法规、基础设施和适应)的四维模型。其次,我们通过路径分析估算了 EPA 量表与既定的环境态度和支持环境行为测量指标之间的关系,从而检验了 EPA 在多大程度上可被视为环境态度或支持环境行为的变体。结果(N = 276)表明,三因素行动领域模型和将 EPA 描述为一种亲环境行为的路径模型的拟合效果略胜一筹。我们的研究结果还表明,情感环境态度对 EPA 的预测作用尤为明显。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Testing the dimensionality of environmental policy approval and its convergence with environmental attitude and behavior measures
It can be argued that environmental policy approval (EPA) is a key individual response to the global ecological crisis. This study explores EPA in two ways. First, we tested the dimensional structure of EPA applying confirmatory factor analysis to a newly constructed 24-item scale. Specifically, we analyzed a one-dimensional EPA model, a two-dimensional model that tells existing policies apart from claimed policies, a three-dimensional model that splits EPA into fields of action (energy, agriculture/nutrition, and mobility/transport), and a four-dimensional model that segments EPA into policy types (charges, regulations, infrastructure, and adaptation). Second, we examined the extent to which EPA can be regarded as a variant of environmental attitude or pro-environmental behavior by estimating the relationship of the EPA scale with established measures of environmental attitude and pro-environmental behavior via path analyses. The results (N = 276) indicate marginally superior fits for the three-factor fields-of-action model and the path model that describes EPA as a pro-environmental behavior. Our findings also suggest that EPA is particularly strongly predicted by affective environmental attitude.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Psychologica
Acta Psychologica PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
5.60%
发文量
274
审稿时长
36 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Psychologica publishes original articles and extended reviews on selected books in any area of experimental psychology. The focus of the Journal is on empirical studies and evaluative review articles that increase the theoretical understanding of human capabilities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信