哮喘的三联吸入疗法:信念、行为和疑虑。

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Bagnasco D, Ansotegui I, Baiardini I, Benfante A, Bernstein Ja, Bikov A, Bondi B, Boulet Lp, Panaitescu C, Canonica Gw, H Chong-Neto, Dubuske L, R El-Owaidy, Ferraris M, Filipovic M, F J Gonzalez-Barcala, Guidos Fogelbach G, Ivancevich Jc, Jusufovic E, Kowal K, Lantieri F, Mahboub B, Mihaicuta S, Mincarini M, Nedeva D, Novakova P, Novakova S, Nunes C, Ricchiuto Fr, Santus P, Scichilone N, Steiropoulos P, Tiotiu Cepuc A, Tomasello A, Virchow Jc, Yadav R, Zunino S, Braido F
{"title":"哮喘的三联吸入疗法:信念、行为和疑虑。","authors":"Bagnasco D, Ansotegui I, Baiardini I, Benfante A, Bernstein Ja, Bikov A, Bondi B, Boulet Lp, Panaitescu C, Canonica Gw, H Chong-Neto, Dubuske L, R El-Owaidy, Ferraris M, Filipovic M, F J Gonzalez-Barcala, Guidos Fogelbach G, Ivancevich Jc, Jusufovic E, Kowal K, Lantieri F, Mahboub B, Mihaicuta S, Mincarini M, Nedeva D, Novakova P, Novakova S, Nunes C, Ricchiuto Fr, Santus P, Scichilone N, Steiropoulos P, Tiotiu Cepuc A, Tomasello A, Virchow Jc, Yadav R, Zunino S, Braido F","doi":"10.1016/j.pupt.2024.102333","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Long-acting muscarinic antagonists (LAMA) in association with inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) plus long-acting beta-2 agonists (LABA) are recommended by the GINA report as further option in step 4 and first choice in step 5 treatment. Despite consistent evidence of its efficacy and safety, inhaled triple therapy (ITT) is still not largely used in patients with asthma. With the aim to explore belief and behaviours of asthma specialists, an ad hoc survey has been developed by a panel of Interasma Scientific Network (INESnet) experts and subsequently defined by two Delphi rounds among an international group of physicians. The questionnaire has been distributed through Interasma social media between June and September 2023. Besides a descriptive analysis, to assess the responses gathered from the questionnaire, Spearman's non-parametric statistical method was employed. Totally, three hundred fourteen questionnaires were completed. Clinicians' attitudes and behaviours toward timing and methodologies adopted in prescribing ITT, were analysed. 35.7% specialists consider ITT as a relevant therapeutic option, 61.8% that is second option after reaching high dose of ICS-LABA and 89.2% agreed that optimization of inhaled therapy should be attempted before the use of biological drugs. Persistent flow limitation and high reversibility are considered predictive factors of response. Specialists consider ITT a resource in asthma management. Although its efficacy in decreasing exacerbation rate and improving lung function were well known, the survey revealed persistent uncertainties among clinicians in positioning it highlighting the need for further measures to effectively integrate research findings into day-to-day clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":20799,"journal":{"name":"Pulmonary pharmacology & therapeutics","volume":" ","pages":"102333"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Triple inhaled therapy in asthma: beliefs, behaviours and doubts.\",\"authors\":\"Bagnasco D, Ansotegui I, Baiardini I, Benfante A, Bernstein Ja, Bikov A, Bondi B, Boulet Lp, Panaitescu C, Canonica Gw, H Chong-Neto, Dubuske L, R El-Owaidy, Ferraris M, Filipovic M, F J Gonzalez-Barcala, Guidos Fogelbach G, Ivancevich Jc, Jusufovic E, Kowal K, Lantieri F, Mahboub B, Mihaicuta S, Mincarini M, Nedeva D, Novakova P, Novakova S, Nunes C, Ricchiuto Fr, Santus P, Scichilone N, Steiropoulos P, Tiotiu Cepuc A, Tomasello A, Virchow Jc, Yadav R, Zunino S, Braido F\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.pupt.2024.102333\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Long-acting muscarinic antagonists (LAMA) in association with inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) plus long-acting beta-2 agonists (LABA) are recommended by the GINA report as further option in step 4 and first choice in step 5 treatment. Despite consistent evidence of its efficacy and safety, inhaled triple therapy (ITT) is still not largely used in patients with asthma. With the aim to explore belief and behaviours of asthma specialists, an ad hoc survey has been developed by a panel of Interasma Scientific Network (INESnet) experts and subsequently defined by two Delphi rounds among an international group of physicians. The questionnaire has been distributed through Interasma social media between June and September 2023. Besides a descriptive analysis, to assess the responses gathered from the questionnaire, Spearman's non-parametric statistical method was employed. Totally, three hundred fourteen questionnaires were completed. Clinicians' attitudes and behaviours toward timing and methodologies adopted in prescribing ITT, were analysed. 35.7% specialists consider ITT as a relevant therapeutic option, 61.8% that is second option after reaching high dose of ICS-LABA and 89.2% agreed that optimization of inhaled therapy should be attempted before the use of biological drugs. Persistent flow limitation and high reversibility are considered predictive factors of response. Specialists consider ITT a resource in asthma management. Although its efficacy in decreasing exacerbation rate and improving lung function were well known, the survey revealed persistent uncertainties among clinicians in positioning it highlighting the need for further measures to effectively integrate research findings into day-to-day clinical practice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20799,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pulmonary pharmacology & therapeutics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"102333\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pulmonary pharmacology & therapeutics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pupt.2024.102333\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pulmonary pharmacology & therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pupt.2024.102333","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

GINA 报告建议,长效毒蕈碱拮抗剂(LAMA)与吸入皮质类固醇(ICS)加长效β-2 受体激动剂(LABA)联合使用,作为第 4 步治疗的进一步选择和第 5 步治疗的首选。尽管吸入三联疗法(ITT)的疗效和安全性得到了一致的证明,但仍未在哮喘患者中得到广泛应用。为了探索哮喘专科医生的信念和行为,Interasma 科学网络(INESnet)专家小组制定了一项特别调查,随后在国际医生小组中进行了两轮德尔菲调查。调查问卷已于 2023 年 6 月至 9 月间通过 Interasma 社交媒体发布。除了描述性分析外,还采用了斯皮尔曼非参数统计方法来评估从问卷中收集到的答复。总共完成了 34 份问卷。调查分析了临床医生对开具 ITT 处方的时间和方法的态度和行为。35.7%的专家认为 ITT 是一种相关的治疗选择,61.8%的专家认为 ITT 是在使用大剂量 ICS-LABA 后的第二种选择,89.2%的专家同意在使用生物药物前应尝试优化吸入疗法。持续性血流受限和高可逆性被认为是预测反应的因素。专家认为 ITT 是哮喘治疗的一种资源。虽然 ITT 在降低哮喘加重率和改善肺功能方面的疗效众所周知,但调查显示临床医生对 ITT 的定位一直存在不确定性,这突出表明有必要采取进一步措施,将研究成果有效融入日常临床实践中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Triple inhaled therapy in asthma: beliefs, behaviours and doubts.

Long-acting muscarinic antagonists (LAMA) in association with inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) plus long-acting beta-2 agonists (LABA) are recommended by the GINA report as further option in step 4 and first choice in step 5 treatment. Despite consistent evidence of its efficacy and safety, inhaled triple therapy (ITT) is still not largely used in patients with asthma. With the aim to explore belief and behaviours of asthma specialists, an ad hoc survey has been developed by a panel of Interasma Scientific Network (INESnet) experts and subsequently defined by two Delphi rounds among an international group of physicians. The questionnaire has been distributed through Interasma social media between June and September 2023. Besides a descriptive analysis, to assess the responses gathered from the questionnaire, Spearman's non-parametric statistical method was employed. Totally, three hundred fourteen questionnaires were completed. Clinicians' attitudes and behaviours toward timing and methodologies adopted in prescribing ITT, were analysed. 35.7% specialists consider ITT as a relevant therapeutic option, 61.8% that is second option after reaching high dose of ICS-LABA and 89.2% agreed that optimization of inhaled therapy should be attempted before the use of biological drugs. Persistent flow limitation and high reversibility are considered predictive factors of response. Specialists consider ITT a resource in asthma management. Although its efficacy in decreasing exacerbation rate and improving lung function were well known, the survey revealed persistent uncertainties among clinicians in positioning it highlighting the need for further measures to effectively integrate research findings into day-to-day clinical practice.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
41
审稿时长
42 days
期刊介绍: Pulmonary Pharmacology and Therapeutics (formerly Pulmonary Pharmacology) is concerned with lung pharmacology from molecular to clinical aspects. The subject matter encompasses the major diseases of the lung including asthma, cystic fibrosis, pulmonary circulation, ARDS, carcinoma, bronchitis, emphysema and drug delivery. Laboratory and clinical research on man and animals will be considered including studies related to chemotherapy of cancer, tuberculosis and infection. In addition to original research papers the journal will include review articles and book reviews. Research Areas Include: • All major diseases of the lung • Physiology • Pathology • Drug delivery • Metabolism • Pulmonary Toxicology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信