就英国全科医生孕前保健的优先事项达成共识:研究协议。

IF 2.9 3区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
PLoS ONE Pub Date : 2024-11-21 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0311578
Danielle Schoenaker, Elizabeth Lovegrove, Miriam Santer, Karen Matvienko-Sikar, Helen Carr, Nisreen A Alwan, Laura Kubelabo, Nathan Davies, Keith M Godfrey
{"title":"就英国全科医生孕前保健的优先事项达成共识:研究协议。","authors":"Danielle Schoenaker, Elizabeth Lovegrove, Miriam Santer, Karen Matvienko-Sikar, Helen Carr, Nisreen A Alwan, Laura Kubelabo, Nathan Davies, Keith M Godfrey","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0311578","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Preconception medical, behavioural and socioeconomic risk factors are common among people of reproductive age and can impact pregnancy and offspring outcomes. In line with clinical guidance, primary care practitioners are encouraged to support patients to manage and optimise their health prior to pregnancy. Due to barriers, including lack of time and resources, this support is not currently part of routine practice.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>As a first step towards the co-development of practical and realistic best practice guidance, this study aims to achieve consensus on a list of priority risk factors that can be used in general practice to guide opportunistic preconception care for patients of reproductive age.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study protocol was developed with a Public Advisory Group of people of reproductive age, researchers and primary care practitioners. The consensus study will consist of three steps: 1) identifying an initial long-list of candidate risk factors and defining principles for scoring the importance of each risk factor, through a literature review, workshops with people of reproductive age, and interviews with primary care practitioners; 2) stakeholder participant prioritisation of each candidate risk factor for its importance for preconception care through a three-round eDelphi survey; and 3) agreeing on the final priority list through consensus meetings with a selected group of stakeholders. Participants living in the UK will be recruited across two stakeholder groups: people of reproductive age (through the Public Advisory Group and charities) and primary care professionals (through professional organisations).</p><p><strong>Ethical approval: </strong>This study has been approved by the University of Southampton Faculty of Medicine Ethics Committee (ERGO 83699 and 92950).</p><p><strong>Dissemination: </strong>All study findings will be shared through stakeholder participants, peer-reviewed publication, lay summary, meetings and conference presentations, and relevant professional and community organisations. Ongoing research will inform implementation of the priority list in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":20189,"journal":{"name":"PLoS ONE","volume":"19 11","pages":"e0311578"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Developing consensus on priorities for preconception care in the general practice setting in the UK: Study protocol.\",\"authors\":\"Danielle Schoenaker, Elizabeth Lovegrove, Miriam Santer, Karen Matvienko-Sikar, Helen Carr, Nisreen A Alwan, Laura Kubelabo, Nathan Davies, Keith M Godfrey\",\"doi\":\"10.1371/journal.pone.0311578\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Preconception medical, behavioural and socioeconomic risk factors are common among people of reproductive age and can impact pregnancy and offspring outcomes. In line with clinical guidance, primary care practitioners are encouraged to support patients to manage and optimise their health prior to pregnancy. Due to barriers, including lack of time and resources, this support is not currently part of routine practice.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>As a first step towards the co-development of practical and realistic best practice guidance, this study aims to achieve consensus on a list of priority risk factors that can be used in general practice to guide opportunistic preconception care for patients of reproductive age.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study protocol was developed with a Public Advisory Group of people of reproductive age, researchers and primary care practitioners. The consensus study will consist of three steps: 1) identifying an initial long-list of candidate risk factors and defining principles for scoring the importance of each risk factor, through a literature review, workshops with people of reproductive age, and interviews with primary care practitioners; 2) stakeholder participant prioritisation of each candidate risk factor for its importance for preconception care through a three-round eDelphi survey; and 3) agreeing on the final priority list through consensus meetings with a selected group of stakeholders. Participants living in the UK will be recruited across two stakeholder groups: people of reproductive age (through the Public Advisory Group and charities) and primary care professionals (through professional organisations).</p><p><strong>Ethical approval: </strong>This study has been approved by the University of Southampton Faculty of Medicine Ethics Committee (ERGO 83699 and 92950).</p><p><strong>Dissemination: </strong>All study findings will be shared through stakeholder participants, peer-reviewed publication, lay summary, meetings and conference presentations, and relevant professional and community organisations. Ongoing research will inform implementation of the priority list in clinical practice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20189,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PLoS ONE\",\"volume\":\"19 11\",\"pages\":\"e0311578\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PLoS ONE\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0311578\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLoS ONE","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0311578","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:孕前医疗、行为和社会经济风险因素在育龄人群中很常见,会影响妊娠和后代的结局。根据临床指南,我们鼓励初级保健医生为患者提供支持,帮助他们管理和优化孕前健康。目的:作为共同制定切实可行的最佳实践指南的第一步,本研究旨在就优先风险因素清单达成共识,该清单可用于全科医生指导育龄患者的孕前择机保健:本研究方案由育龄人群、研究人员和全科医生组成的公众咨询小组共同制定。共识研究将包括三个步骤:1)通过文献综述、与育龄人群的研讨会以及与初级保健从业人员的访谈,确定候选风险因素的初步长清单,并确定对每个风险因素的重要性进行评分的原则;2)通过三轮 eDelphi 调查,由利益相关者参与对每个候选风险因素在孕前保健中的重要性进行优先排序;3)通过与选定的利益相关者群体举行共识会议,就最终的优先排序清单达成一致意见。将在两个利益相关者群体中招募居住在英国的参与者:育龄人群(通过公众咨询小组和慈善机构)和初级保健专业人员(通过专业组织):本研究已获得南安普敦大学医学院伦理委员会的批准(ERGO 83699 和 92950):所有研究结果都将通过利益相关者参与者、同行评审出版物、非专业摘要、会议和大会演讲以及相关专业和社区组织进行分享。正在进行的研究将为在临床实践中实施优先事项清单提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Developing consensus on priorities for preconception care in the general practice setting in the UK: Study protocol.

Background: Preconception medical, behavioural and socioeconomic risk factors are common among people of reproductive age and can impact pregnancy and offspring outcomes. In line with clinical guidance, primary care practitioners are encouraged to support patients to manage and optimise their health prior to pregnancy. Due to barriers, including lack of time and resources, this support is not currently part of routine practice.

Aim: As a first step towards the co-development of practical and realistic best practice guidance, this study aims to achieve consensus on a list of priority risk factors that can be used in general practice to guide opportunistic preconception care for patients of reproductive age.

Methods: This study protocol was developed with a Public Advisory Group of people of reproductive age, researchers and primary care practitioners. The consensus study will consist of three steps: 1) identifying an initial long-list of candidate risk factors and defining principles for scoring the importance of each risk factor, through a literature review, workshops with people of reproductive age, and interviews with primary care practitioners; 2) stakeholder participant prioritisation of each candidate risk factor for its importance for preconception care through a three-round eDelphi survey; and 3) agreeing on the final priority list through consensus meetings with a selected group of stakeholders. Participants living in the UK will be recruited across two stakeholder groups: people of reproductive age (through the Public Advisory Group and charities) and primary care professionals (through professional organisations).

Ethical approval: This study has been approved by the University of Southampton Faculty of Medicine Ethics Committee (ERGO 83699 and 92950).

Dissemination: All study findings will be shared through stakeholder participants, peer-reviewed publication, lay summary, meetings and conference presentations, and relevant professional and community organisations. Ongoing research will inform implementation of the priority list in clinical practice.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
PLoS ONE
PLoS ONE 生物-生物学
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
5.40%
发文量
14242
审稿时长
3.7 months
期刊介绍: PLOS ONE is an international, peer-reviewed, open-access, online publication. PLOS ONE welcomes reports on primary research from any scientific discipline. It provides: * Open-access—freely accessible online, authors retain copyright * Fast publication times * Peer review by expert, practicing researchers * Post-publication tools to indicate quality and impact * Community-based dialogue on articles * Worldwide media coverage
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信