Renée van Dinter, Annemarie C Jenks, Ellen H Roels, Marcel W M Post, Michiel F Reneman
{"title":"肢体残疾人工作能力指数（单项）的重测可靠性和一致性。","authors":"Renée van Dinter, Annemarie C Jenks, Ellen H Roels, Marcel W M Post, Michiel F Reneman","doi":"10.1016/j.apmr.2024.10.018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the test-retest reliability and agreement of the work ability index-single item (WAS) in persons with a physical disability.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Test-retest study, with a 2-4 week interval. Test-retest reliability was computed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). The agreement was analyzed using Bland-Altman plots.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Vocational rehabilitation department of a rehabilitation center.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Patients with a physical disability (spinal cord injury, acquired brain injury, neuromuscular disease, or other).</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Not applicable.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>The WAS consists of 1 question on self-reported current work ability compared with their highest work ability ever, rated on a 0-10 scale.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data from 44 patients were available and 22 patients reported no changes in work or medical situation between the 2 measurements. After excluding 1 outlier in this subgroup (n=21), the ICC was 0.89 (95% confidence interval, 0.76-0.96), the mean test-retest difference was -0.05 points and the limits of agreement were ±2.4 points.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The WAS is reliable for measuring work ability in persons with a physical disability. Using the WAS could be valuable as a routine outcome measure in vocational rehabilitation for persons with a physical disability.</p>","PeriodicalId":8313,"journal":{"name":"Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Test-Retest Reliability and Agreement of the Work Ability Index-Single Item in Persons With Physical Disabilities.\",\"authors\":\"Renée van Dinter, Annemarie C Jenks, Ellen H Roels, Marcel W M Post, Michiel F Reneman\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.apmr.2024.10.018\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the test-retest reliability and agreement of the work ability index-single item (WAS) in persons with a physical disability.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Test-retest study, with a 2-4 week interval. Test-retest reliability was computed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). The agreement was analyzed using Bland-Altman plots.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Vocational rehabilitation department of a rehabilitation center.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Patients with a physical disability (spinal cord injury, acquired brain injury, neuromuscular disease, or other).</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Not applicable.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>The WAS consists of 1 question on self-reported current work ability compared with their highest work ability ever, rated on a 0-10 scale.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data from 44 patients were available and 22 patients reported no changes in work or medical situation between the 2 measurements. After excluding 1 outlier in this subgroup (n=21), the ICC was 0.89 (95% confidence interval, 0.76-0.96), the mean test-retest difference was -0.05 points and the limits of agreement were ±2.4 points.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The WAS is reliable for measuring work ability in persons with a physical disability. Using the WAS could be valuable as a routine outcome measure in vocational rehabilitation for persons with a physical disability.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8313,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2024.10.018\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2024.10.018","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
Test-Retest Reliability and Agreement of the Work Ability Index-Single Item in Persons With Physical Disabilities.
Objective: To assess the test-retest reliability and agreement of the work ability index-single item (WAS) in persons with a physical disability.
Design: Test-retest study, with a 2-4 week interval. Test-retest reliability was computed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). The agreement was analyzed using Bland-Altman plots.
Setting: Vocational rehabilitation department of a rehabilitation center.
Participants: Patients with a physical disability (spinal cord injury, acquired brain injury, neuromuscular disease, or other).
Interventions: Not applicable.
Main outcome measures: The WAS consists of 1 question on self-reported current work ability compared with their highest work ability ever, rated on a 0-10 scale.
Results: Data from 44 patients were available and 22 patients reported no changes in work or medical situation between the 2 measurements. After excluding 1 outlier in this subgroup (n=21), the ICC was 0.89 (95% confidence interval, 0.76-0.96), the mean test-retest difference was -0.05 points and the limits of agreement were ±2.4 points.
Conclusions: The WAS is reliable for measuring work ability in persons with a physical disability. Using the WAS could be valuable as a routine outcome measure in vocational rehabilitation for persons with a physical disability.
期刊介绍：
The Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation publishes original, peer-reviewed research and clinical reports on important trends and developments in physical medicine and rehabilitation and related fields. This international journal brings researchers and clinicians authoritative information on the therapeutic utilization of physical, behavioral and pharmaceutical agents in providing comprehensive care for individuals with chronic illness and disabilities.
Archives began publication in 1920, publishes monthly, and is the official journal of the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Its papers are cited more often than any other rehabilitation journal.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
