人工淋巴引流对疼痛阈值和耐受性、触觉和力量的康复效果。

Emine Cihan, Cansu Sahbaz Pirinççi
{"title":"人工淋巴引流对疼痛阈值和耐受性、触觉和力量的康复效果。","authors":"Emine Cihan, Cansu Sahbaz Pirinççi","doi":"10.24875/CIRU.24000129","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study evaluates the acute therapeutic effect of manual lymphatic drainage (MLD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eighty-two individuals (164 upper limbs) participating in the study were divided into two groups: MLD and sham. Before and after treatment, measurements of pressure pain threshold (PPT), pain tolerance, muscle strength (using a hand dynamometer and pinchmeter), and two-point discrimination (2PD) with an esthesiometer were conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Age, height, weight, body mass index, gender, and dominant extremity of the participants showed similar characteristics (p > 0.05). There was a difference hypothenar PPT (p = 0.038) and pain tolerance (p = 0.009), thenar PPT (p = 0.021) and pain tolerance (p = 0.001), mid-ulnar PPT (p = 0.028), biceps PPT (p < 0.001), pain tolerance (p < 0.001), and grip strength (p = 0.030) between the groups after the therapy. When comparison was made between the groups at baseline and after the treatment all were found to differ (p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>MLD reduced PPR, pain tolerance, hand grip, and pinch strength in young adults. However, in this population, the distance felt in 2PD evaluation with MLD decreased.</p>","PeriodicalId":93936,"journal":{"name":"Cirugia y cirujanos","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Rehabilitation effect of manual lymphatic drainage on pain threshold and tolerance, tactile sensation, and strength.\",\"authors\":\"Emine Cihan, Cansu Sahbaz Pirinççi\",\"doi\":\"10.24875/CIRU.24000129\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study evaluates the acute therapeutic effect of manual lymphatic drainage (MLD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eighty-two individuals (164 upper limbs) participating in the study were divided into two groups: MLD and sham. Before and after treatment, measurements of pressure pain threshold (PPT), pain tolerance, muscle strength (using a hand dynamometer and pinchmeter), and two-point discrimination (2PD) with an esthesiometer were conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Age, height, weight, body mass index, gender, and dominant extremity of the participants showed similar characteristics (p > 0.05). There was a difference hypothenar PPT (p = 0.038) and pain tolerance (p = 0.009), thenar PPT (p = 0.021) and pain tolerance (p = 0.001), mid-ulnar PPT (p = 0.028), biceps PPT (p < 0.001), pain tolerance (p < 0.001), and grip strength (p = 0.030) between the groups after the therapy. When comparison was made between the groups at baseline and after the treatment all were found to differ (p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>MLD reduced PPR, pain tolerance, hand grip, and pinch strength in young adults. However, in this population, the distance felt in 2PD evaluation with MLD decreased.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93936,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cirugia y cirujanos\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cirugia y cirujanos\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24875/CIRU.24000129\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cirugia y cirujanos","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24875/CIRU.24000129","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究评估了人工淋巴引流术(MLD)的急性治疗效果:本研究评估了人工淋巴引流术(MLD)的急性治疗效果:参加研究的 82 人(164 个上肢)分为两组:MLD组和假治疗组。在治疗前后,对压力痛阈值(PPT)、疼痛耐受性、肌肉力量(使用手部测力计和捏力计)和两点辨别力(2PD)进行了测量:结果:受试者的年龄、身高、体重、体重指数、性别和优势肢体的特征相似(P > 0.05)。治疗后,各组间的下桡侧 PPT(p = 0.038)和疼痛耐受性(p = 0.009)、踵侧 PPT(p = 0.021)和疼痛耐受性(p = 0.001)、中桡侧 PPT(p = 0.028)、肱二头肌 PPT(p < 0.001)、疼痛耐受性(p < 0.001)和握力(p = 0.030)均有差异。在对基线组和治疗后组进行比较时,发现所有组间均存在差异(P < 0.05):结论:MLD 降低了青壮年的肢体活动能力、疼痛耐受力、手部握力和捏力。然而,在这一人群中,使用 MLD 进行 2PD 评估时感受到的距离减少了。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Rehabilitation effect of manual lymphatic drainage on pain threshold and tolerance, tactile sensation, and strength.

Objective: This study evaluates the acute therapeutic effect of manual lymphatic drainage (MLD).

Methods: Eighty-two individuals (164 upper limbs) participating in the study were divided into two groups: MLD and sham. Before and after treatment, measurements of pressure pain threshold (PPT), pain tolerance, muscle strength (using a hand dynamometer and pinchmeter), and two-point discrimination (2PD) with an esthesiometer were conducted.

Results: Age, height, weight, body mass index, gender, and dominant extremity of the participants showed similar characteristics (p > 0.05). There was a difference hypothenar PPT (p = 0.038) and pain tolerance (p = 0.009), thenar PPT (p = 0.021) and pain tolerance (p = 0.001), mid-ulnar PPT (p = 0.028), biceps PPT (p < 0.001), pain tolerance (p < 0.001), and grip strength (p = 0.030) between the groups after the therapy. When comparison was made between the groups at baseline and after the treatment all were found to differ (p < 0.05).

Conclusions: MLD reduced PPR, pain tolerance, hand grip, and pinch strength in young adults. However, in this population, the distance felt in 2PD evaluation with MLD decreased.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信