Mingxing Huang, Weichen Wang, Rang Wang, Rong Tian
{"title":"食管癌治疗前[18F]FDG PET/CT 参数的预后价值：一项荟萃分析。","authors":"Mingxing Huang, Weichen Wang, Rang Wang, Rong Tian","doi":"10.1007/s00330-024-11207-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aims to evaluate the prognostic implications of pretreatment [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG-PET metrics in esophageal cancer patients through a meta-analysis of the existing literature.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We carefully searched electronic databases, including PubMed and Embase, from inception to April 1, 2024, to identify studies describing the prognostic value of pretreatment PET metrics for advanced esophageal cancer. Clinical endpoints examined were overall survival (OS), recurrence-free survival (RFS)/disease-free survival (DFS), and progression-free survival (PFS). Hazard ratios (HRs) for PFS and OS were taken directly from the original reports.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-seven publications, including 5504 patients, were included in our analysis. OS and PFS were analyzed in 31 and nine studies, respectively, and DFS/RFS was analyzed in 16 studies. The comprehensive pooled analysis revealed significant associations between metabolic parameters derived from positron emission tomography (PET) imaging and clinical outcomes. Expressly, the pooled HR indicated that patients with higher SUVmax were significantly associated with poor PFS (HR: 1.06; 95% CI: 1.01-1.12, p = 0.011) and poor RFS/DFS (HR: 1.09; 95% CI: 1.02-1.18, p = 0.019). Patients with higher SUVmean were significantly associated with poorer OS (HR: 1.07; 95% CI: 1.01-1.14, p = 0.025). High MTV was significantly associated with inferior OS (HR: 1.02; 95% CI: 1.00-1.05, p = 0.049). High TLG was significantly associated with poorer RFS/DFS (HR: 2.02; 95% CI: 1.11-3.68, p = 0.022).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study unveiled pretreatment FDG-derived parameters as valuable prognostic indicators in assessing esophageal cancer outcomes. Specifically, SUVmax is associated with PFS and RFS/DFS. SUVmean and MTV were correlated with OS, and TLG was only associated with RFS/DFS.</p><p><strong>Key points: </strong>Question Inconsistent findings on the prognostic value of pretreatment [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG PET parameters in esophageal cancer require comprehensive analysis to clarify their role in outcome prediction. Findings Higher pretreatment [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG-PET metrics (SUVmax, SUVmean, MTV, TLG) are associated with poor survival outcomes, emphasizing their potential value in enhancing prognostic assessments for esophageal cancer. Clinical relevance This study highlights the prognostic significance of pretreatment [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG-PET metrics in esophageal cancer, providing valuable insights for patient outcome prediction and potentially guiding personalized treatment strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":12076,"journal":{"name":"European Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The prognostic value of pretreatment [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG PET/CT parameters in esophageal cancer: a meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Mingxing Huang, Weichen Wang, Rang Wang, Rong Tian\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00330-024-11207-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aims to evaluate the prognostic implications of pretreatment [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG-PET metrics in esophageal cancer patients through a meta-analysis of the existing literature.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We carefully searched electronic databases, including PubMed and Embase, from inception to April 1, 2024, to identify studies describing the prognostic value of pretreatment PET metrics for advanced esophageal cancer. Clinical endpoints examined were overall survival (OS), recurrence-free survival (RFS)/disease-free survival (DFS), and progression-free survival (PFS). Hazard ratios (HRs) for PFS and OS were taken directly from the original reports.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-seven publications, including 5504 patients, were included in our analysis. OS and PFS were analyzed in 31 and nine studies, respectively, and DFS/RFS was analyzed in 16 studies. The comprehensive pooled analysis revealed significant associations between metabolic parameters derived from positron emission tomography (PET) imaging and clinical outcomes. Expressly, the pooled HR indicated that patients with higher SUVmax were significantly associated with poor PFS (HR: 1.06; 95% CI: 1.01-1.12, p = 0.011) and poor RFS/DFS (HR: 1.09; 95% CI: 1.02-1.18, p = 0.019). Patients with higher SUVmean were significantly associated with poorer OS (HR: 1.07; 95% CI: 1.01-1.14, p = 0.025). High MTV was significantly associated with inferior OS (HR: 1.02; 95% CI: 1.00-1.05, p = 0.049). High TLG was significantly associated with poorer RFS/DFS (HR: 2.02; 95% CI: 1.11-3.68, p = 0.022).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study unveiled pretreatment FDG-derived parameters as valuable prognostic indicators in assessing esophageal cancer outcomes. Specifically, SUVmax is associated with PFS and RFS/DFS. SUVmean and MTV were correlated with OS, and TLG was only associated with RFS/DFS.</p><p><strong>Key points: </strong>Question Inconsistent findings on the prognostic value of pretreatment [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG PET parameters in esophageal cancer require comprehensive analysis to clarify their role in outcome prediction. Findings Higher pretreatment [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG-PET metrics (SUVmax, SUVmean, MTV, TLG) are associated with poor survival outcomes, emphasizing their potential value in enhancing prognostic assessments for esophageal cancer. Clinical relevance This study highlights the prognostic significance of pretreatment [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG-PET metrics in esophageal cancer, providing valuable insights for patient outcome prediction and potentially guiding personalized treatment strategies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12076,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Radiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-024-11207-3\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-024-11207-3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
The prognostic value of pretreatment [18F]FDG PET/CT parameters in esophageal cancer: a meta-analysis.
Objectives: This study aims to evaluate the prognostic implications of pretreatment [18F]FDG-PET metrics in esophageal cancer patients through a meta-analysis of the existing literature.
Methods: We carefully searched electronic databases, including PubMed and Embase, from inception to April 1, 2024, to identify studies describing the prognostic value of pretreatment PET metrics for advanced esophageal cancer. Clinical endpoints examined were overall survival (OS), recurrence-free survival (RFS)/disease-free survival (DFS), and progression-free survival (PFS). Hazard ratios (HRs) for PFS and OS were taken directly from the original reports.
Results: Forty-seven publications, including 5504 patients, were included in our analysis. OS and PFS were analyzed in 31 and nine studies, respectively, and DFS/RFS was analyzed in 16 studies. The comprehensive pooled analysis revealed significant associations between metabolic parameters derived from positron emission tomography (PET) imaging and clinical outcomes. Expressly, the pooled HR indicated that patients with higher SUVmax were significantly associated with poor PFS (HR: 1.06; 95% CI: 1.01-1.12, p = 0.011) and poor RFS/DFS (HR: 1.09; 95% CI: 1.02-1.18, p = 0.019). Patients with higher SUVmean were significantly associated with poorer OS (HR: 1.07; 95% CI: 1.01-1.14, p = 0.025). High MTV was significantly associated with inferior OS (HR: 1.02; 95% CI: 1.00-1.05, p = 0.049). High TLG was significantly associated with poorer RFS/DFS (HR: 2.02; 95% CI: 1.11-3.68, p = 0.022).
Conclusion: This study unveiled pretreatment FDG-derived parameters as valuable prognostic indicators in assessing esophageal cancer outcomes. Specifically, SUVmax is associated with PFS and RFS/DFS. SUVmean and MTV were correlated with OS, and TLG was only associated with RFS/DFS.
Key points: Question Inconsistent findings on the prognostic value of pretreatment [18F]FDG PET parameters in esophageal cancer require comprehensive analysis to clarify their role in outcome prediction. Findings Higher pretreatment [18F]FDG-PET metrics (SUVmax, SUVmean, MTV, TLG) are associated with poor survival outcomes, emphasizing their potential value in enhancing prognostic assessments for esophageal cancer. Clinical relevance This study highlights the prognostic significance of pretreatment [18F]FDG-PET metrics in esophageal cancer, providing valuable insights for patient outcome prediction and potentially guiding personalized treatment strategies.
期刊介绍：
European Radiology (ER) continuously updates scientific knowledge in radiology by publication of strong original articles and state-of-the-art reviews written by leading radiologists. A well balanced combination of review articles, original papers, short communications from European radiological congresses and information on society matters makes ER an indispensable source for current information in this field.
This is the Journal of the European Society of Radiology, and the official journal of a number of societies.
From 2004-2008 supplements to European Radiology were published under its companion, European Radiology Supplements, ISSN 1613-3749.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
