由临床药师主导的癌症治疗医院抗真菌药物使用情况审查:前瞻性审计与反馈。

IF 3.7 Q2 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
JAC-Antimicrobial Resistance Pub Date : 2024-11-19 eCollection Date: 2024-12-01 DOI:10.1093/jacamr/dlae184
Zunaira Akbar, Muhammad Aamir, Zikria Saleem, Muhammad Rehan Khan, Omar Akhlaq Bhutta
{"title":"由临床药师主导的癌症治疗医院抗真菌药物使用情况审查:前瞻性审计与反馈。","authors":"Zunaira Akbar, Muhammad Aamir, Zikria Saleem, Muhammad Rehan Khan, Omar Akhlaq Bhutta","doi":"10.1093/jacamr/dlae184","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>The global rise in systemic fungal infections and increased antifungal use underscores the need for pharmacist-led antifungal stewardship in oncology but data on such interventions are scarce. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical pharmacist-led antifungal drug utilization reviews for optimizing antifungal therapy in a specialized cancer care hospital.</p><p><strong>Patients and method: </strong>This pharmacist-led prospective audit and feedback study evaluated 350 admitted patients with cancer who were prescribed systemic antifungals. Electronic medical records of the included patients were reviewed to evaluate pharmacist interventions. Data were entered and analysed through SPSS version 21.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>Most of the patients were prescribed antifungals for suspected fungal infections (41.7%). Febrile neutropenia was present in 55.4% of patients. The most frequently isolated fungus was <i>C. albicans</i> (15.4%) followed by <i>C. tropicalis</i> (8.6%) and <i>A. flavus</i> (7.7%). The most frequently prescribed antifungal drug was voriconazole (38.8%) and amphotericin B (31.7%). Major pharmacist-led interventions were a change of IV antifungal therapy to an oral drug (18%), choice of drug therapy (17.4%) and dose reduction (16.9%). All the interventions made by the pharmacist were accepted by the AFS team (100%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Pharmacists play a crucial role in optimizing antifungal therapy by conducting drug utilization reviews and implementing targeted interventions. These interventions are beneficial for overall management of patients with cancer and improving the quality of antifungal prescribing.</p>","PeriodicalId":14594,"journal":{"name":"JAC-Antimicrobial Resistance","volume":"6 6","pages":"dlae184"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11574612/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical pharmacist-led antifungal drug utilization reviews in cancer care hospital: a prospective audit and feedback.\",\"authors\":\"Zunaira Akbar, Muhammad Aamir, Zikria Saleem, Muhammad Rehan Khan, Omar Akhlaq Bhutta\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jacamr/dlae184\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>The global rise in systemic fungal infections and increased antifungal use underscores the need for pharmacist-led antifungal stewardship in oncology but data on such interventions are scarce. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical pharmacist-led antifungal drug utilization reviews for optimizing antifungal therapy in a specialized cancer care hospital.</p><p><strong>Patients and method: </strong>This pharmacist-led prospective audit and feedback study evaluated 350 admitted patients with cancer who were prescribed systemic antifungals. Electronic medical records of the included patients were reviewed to evaluate pharmacist interventions. Data were entered and analysed through SPSS version 21.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>Most of the patients were prescribed antifungals for suspected fungal infections (41.7%). Febrile neutropenia was present in 55.4% of patients. The most frequently isolated fungus was <i>C. albicans</i> (15.4%) followed by <i>C. tropicalis</i> (8.6%) and <i>A. flavus</i> (7.7%). The most frequently prescribed antifungal drug was voriconazole (38.8%) and amphotericin B (31.7%). Major pharmacist-led interventions were a change of IV antifungal therapy to an oral drug (18%), choice of drug therapy (17.4%) and dose reduction (16.9%). All the interventions made by the pharmacist were accepted by the AFS team (100%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Pharmacists play a crucial role in optimizing antifungal therapy by conducting drug utilization reviews and implementing targeted interventions. These interventions are beneficial for overall management of patients with cancer and improving the quality of antifungal prescribing.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14594,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JAC-Antimicrobial Resistance\",\"volume\":\"6 6\",\"pages\":\"dlae184\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11574612/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JAC-Antimicrobial Resistance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jacamr/dlae184\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAC-Antimicrobial Resistance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jacamr/dlae184","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:全球系统性真菌感染率的上升和抗真菌药物使用量的增加凸显了肿瘤科药剂师主导的抗真菌药物管理的必要性,但有关此类干预措施的数据却很少。本研究旨在评估由临床药师主导的抗真菌药物使用审查,以优化肿瘤专科医院的抗真菌治疗:这项以药剂师为主导的前瞻性审核和反馈研究对 350 名住院的癌症患者进行了评估,这些患者均被处方全身用抗真菌药物。研究人员审查了纳入患者的电子病历,以评估药剂师的干预措施。数据通过 SPSS 21 版进行输入和分析:结果:大多数患者因疑似真菌感染而被处方抗真菌药(41.7%)。55.4%的患者出现发热性中性粒细胞减少症。最常分离出的真菌是白僵菌(15.4%),其次是热带僵菌(8.6%)和黄杆菌(7.7%)。最常处方的抗真菌药物是伏立康唑(38.8%)和两性霉素 B(31.7%)。药剂师主导的主要干预措施是将静脉注射抗真菌治疗改为口服药物(18%)、选择药物治疗(17.4%)和减少剂量(16.9%)。药剂师的所有干预措施都得到了 AFS 团队的认可(100%):药剂师在优化抗真菌治疗方面发挥着至关重要的作用,他们对药物使用情况进行审查,并实施有针对性的干预措施。这些干预措施有利于癌症患者的整体管理和提高抗真菌处方的质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Clinical pharmacist-led antifungal drug utilization reviews in cancer care hospital: a prospective audit and feedback.

Background and objective: The global rise in systemic fungal infections and increased antifungal use underscores the need for pharmacist-led antifungal stewardship in oncology but data on such interventions are scarce. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical pharmacist-led antifungal drug utilization reviews for optimizing antifungal therapy in a specialized cancer care hospital.

Patients and method: This pharmacist-led prospective audit and feedback study evaluated 350 admitted patients with cancer who were prescribed systemic antifungals. Electronic medical records of the included patients were reviewed to evaluate pharmacist interventions. Data were entered and analysed through SPSS version 21.

Result: Most of the patients were prescribed antifungals for suspected fungal infections (41.7%). Febrile neutropenia was present in 55.4% of patients. The most frequently isolated fungus was C. albicans (15.4%) followed by C. tropicalis (8.6%) and A. flavus (7.7%). The most frequently prescribed antifungal drug was voriconazole (38.8%) and amphotericin B (31.7%). Major pharmacist-led interventions were a change of IV antifungal therapy to an oral drug (18%), choice of drug therapy (17.4%) and dose reduction (16.9%). All the interventions made by the pharmacist were accepted by the AFS team (100%).

Conclusion: Pharmacists play a crucial role in optimizing antifungal therapy by conducting drug utilization reviews and implementing targeted interventions. These interventions are beneficial for overall management of patients with cancer and improving the quality of antifungal prescribing.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信