精神病康复的动力、污名化和精神保健中的微观诽谤:对服务使用者叙述的定性研究。

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Ploon Defourny, Nienke van Sambeek, Hester van de Bovenkamp, Floortje Scheepers, Marjolijn Heerings
{"title":"精神病康复的动力、污名化和精神保健中的微观诽谤:对服务使用者叙述的定性研究。","authors":"Ploon Defourny, Nienke van Sambeek, Hester van de Bovenkamp, Floortje Scheepers, Marjolijn Heerings","doi":"10.1186/s12888-024-06262-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Collaborative care relationships form a key component of recovery-oriented mental healthcare, but can be disrupted if service users feel judged by professionals. Professionals can express stigmatizing attitudes through microaggressions, i.e. subtle forms of discrimination that have a negative cumulative effect. People with psychosis have been found to regularly experience overt and subtle forms of stigma in mental healthcare. This study aims to expand our understanding of the various forms and consequences of microaggression from a service user perspective.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this qualitative study, we analysed narratives of people with psychosis purposefully selected from two collections of Dutch patient-authored stories ('Verhalenbank psychiatrie' and 'Patientervaringsverhalen'), including two books and nine transcripts of low-structured interviews. We performed thematic analysis to identify different forms of microaggression and additionally used narrative analysis to gain insight into the experienced consequences for recovery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified three main forms of microaggression: microaggressions that dehumanize; microaggressions that disregard service users' perspectives; and microaggressions that convey hopelessness. Experienced consequences of microaggression included feelings of loneliness, powerlessness and uselessness, acts of despair, resistance or withdrawal, and disengagement from services. Microaggressions were found to create additional recovery needs that were often addressed outside mental healthcare.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings illustrate the gap between ideals concerning collaborative care relationships and the everyday experiences of service users. Service users often experienced an absence of relationship-building in mental healthcare, with negative consequences for their recovery process. Our identification of different forms of microaggression can raise awareness and effectuate behavioural change in professionals and contribute to the emancipation of people with psychosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":9029,"journal":{"name":"BMC Psychiatry","volume":"24 1","pages":"825"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11577601/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dynamics of recovery in psychosis, stigmatization, and microaggressions in mental healthcare: a qualitative study of service users' narratives.\",\"authors\":\"Ploon Defourny, Nienke van Sambeek, Hester van de Bovenkamp, Floortje Scheepers, Marjolijn Heerings\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12888-024-06262-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Collaborative care relationships form a key component of recovery-oriented mental healthcare, but can be disrupted if service users feel judged by professionals. Professionals can express stigmatizing attitudes through microaggressions, i.e. subtle forms of discrimination that have a negative cumulative effect. People with psychosis have been found to regularly experience overt and subtle forms of stigma in mental healthcare. This study aims to expand our understanding of the various forms and consequences of microaggression from a service user perspective.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this qualitative study, we analysed narratives of people with psychosis purposefully selected from two collections of Dutch patient-authored stories ('Verhalenbank psychiatrie' and 'Patientervaringsverhalen'), including two books and nine transcripts of low-structured interviews. We performed thematic analysis to identify different forms of microaggression and additionally used narrative analysis to gain insight into the experienced consequences for recovery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified three main forms of microaggression: microaggressions that dehumanize; microaggressions that disregard service users' perspectives; and microaggressions that convey hopelessness. Experienced consequences of microaggression included feelings of loneliness, powerlessness and uselessness, acts of despair, resistance or withdrawal, and disengagement from services. Microaggressions were found to create additional recovery needs that were often addressed outside mental healthcare.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings illustrate the gap between ideals concerning collaborative care relationships and the everyday experiences of service users. Service users often experienced an absence of relationship-building in mental healthcare, with negative consequences for their recovery process. Our identification of different forms of microaggression can raise awareness and effectuate behavioural change in professionals and contribute to the emancipation of people with psychosis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9029,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Psychiatry\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"825\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11577601/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-024-06262-5\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-024-06262-5","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:合作护理关系是以康复为导向的精神医疗保健的重要组成部分,但如果服务使用者觉得受到专业人员的评判,合作护理关系就会受到破坏。专业人员可以通过微小的冒犯(即具有负面累积效应的微妙歧视形式)来表达鄙视态度。研究发现,精神病患者在精神医疗保健领域经常会遭遇公开和微妙形式的污名化。本研究旨在从服务使用者的角度出发,扩大我们对微侵害的各种形式和后果的理解:在这项定性研究中,我们分析了从两本由荷兰患者撰写的故事集("Verhalenbank psychiatrie "和 "Patientervaringsverhalen")中特意挑选出来的精神病患者的叙述,其中包括两本书和九份低结构访谈记录。我们进行了主题分析,以确定微侵害的不同形式,此外还使用了叙事分析来深入了解所经历的康复后果:我们确定了微侵害的三种主要形式:非人化的微侵害;无视服务使用者观点的微侵害;以及传达绝望情绪的微侵害。微侵害造成的后果包括孤独感、无力感和无用感、绝望行为、抵制或退缩,以及脱离服务。研究发现,微小侵害会产生额外的康复需求,而这些需求往往是在精神医疗之外解决的:我们的研究结果表明,合作护理关系的理想与服务使用者的日常体验之间存在差距。服务使用者经常在心理保健中体验到关系建设的缺失,这对他们的康复过程造成了负面影响。我们对不同形式的微侵害的识别可以提高专业人员的意识,促使他们改变行为,从而为解放精神病患者做出贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Dynamics of recovery in psychosis, stigmatization, and microaggressions in mental healthcare: a qualitative study of service users' narratives.

Background: Collaborative care relationships form a key component of recovery-oriented mental healthcare, but can be disrupted if service users feel judged by professionals. Professionals can express stigmatizing attitudes through microaggressions, i.e. subtle forms of discrimination that have a negative cumulative effect. People with psychosis have been found to regularly experience overt and subtle forms of stigma in mental healthcare. This study aims to expand our understanding of the various forms and consequences of microaggression from a service user perspective.

Methods: In this qualitative study, we analysed narratives of people with psychosis purposefully selected from two collections of Dutch patient-authored stories ('Verhalenbank psychiatrie' and 'Patientervaringsverhalen'), including two books and nine transcripts of low-structured interviews. We performed thematic analysis to identify different forms of microaggression and additionally used narrative analysis to gain insight into the experienced consequences for recovery.

Results: We identified three main forms of microaggression: microaggressions that dehumanize; microaggressions that disregard service users' perspectives; and microaggressions that convey hopelessness. Experienced consequences of microaggression included feelings of loneliness, powerlessness and uselessness, acts of despair, resistance or withdrawal, and disengagement from services. Microaggressions were found to create additional recovery needs that were often addressed outside mental healthcare.

Conclusion: Our findings illustrate the gap between ideals concerning collaborative care relationships and the everyday experiences of service users. Service users often experienced an absence of relationship-building in mental healthcare, with negative consequences for their recovery process. Our identification of different forms of microaggression can raise awareness and effectuate behavioural change in professionals and contribute to the emancipation of people with psychosis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Psychiatry
BMC Psychiatry 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
4.50%
发文量
716
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Psychiatry is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of psychiatric disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信