Daniel Sykora, Nicole Olson, Robert Churchill, B Michelle Kim, Melanie Bratcher, Mohamed Elwazir, Kathleen Young, Sami Ryan, Michelle Brodin, Jan Anderson, Jeremiah Saunders, Omar Abou Ezzeddine, John Bois, John Giudicessi, Leslie Cooper, Andrew Rosenbaum
{"title":"针对心脏肉样瘤病和收缩性心力衰竭患者的药剂师药物滴定计划:回顾性队列研究","authors":"Daniel Sykora, Nicole Olson, Robert Churchill, B Michelle Kim, Melanie Bratcher, Mohamed Elwazir, Kathleen Young, Sami Ryan, Michelle Brodin, Jan Anderson, Jeremiah Saunders, Omar Abou Ezzeddine, John Bois, John Giudicessi, Leslie Cooper, Andrew Rosenbaum","doi":"10.1161/JAHA.124.038965","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A multidisciplinary approach improves guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) in systolic heart failure (HF), but its efficacy in patients with HF due to cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) is unreported.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>In a retrospective cohort study, we reviewed 848 patients from our institutional CS clinics, identifying those with a CS diagnosis, HF (LVEF < 50%) at index evaluation, and echocardiograms within 90 days and 11-36 months. Patients were stratified by participation in a pharmacist-led medication therapy management (MTM) program for GDMT optimization (MTM vs non-MTM [NMTM]) without randomization. Demographics, LVEF, GDMT (quantified by Kansas City Medical Optimization [KCMO] score), and immunosuppressive therapy were assessed. Primary outcomes included changes in KCMO score, LVEF, and cardiovascular event-free survival (unplanned HF hospitalization, LVAD/heart transplant, or death). The final cohort included 111 patients (median age 57 years, 34% female, 64% NYHA Class I-II); 43 (39%) were MTM and 68 (61%) were NMTM. Mean KCMO score was similar at index evaluation (MTM: 23.2; NMTM: 29.6, p=0.83). At follow-up (median 16 months), the KCMO score increased significantly in both groups (MTM: 23.2 to 74.8, p<0.001; NMTM: 29.6 to 58.7, p<0.001), but was higher in MTM (p=0.001). Mean LVEF trended towards higher values in MTM (44.4% vs 40.0%, p=0.05). The primary clinical outcome occurred in 1 MTM (2.3%) and 16 NMTM (23.5%) patients, with higher risk in NMTM (HR 11.97 [95%CI 1.58 - 90.54], p=0.002).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this retrospective cohort study, a pharmacist-led MTM program was associated with favorable GDMT optimization and lower risk of adverse cardiovascular outcomes in CS patients with HF.</p>","PeriodicalId":54370,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Heart Association","volume":" ","pages":"e038965"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Pharmacist Medication Titration Program for Patients with Cardiac Sarcoidosis and Systolic Heart Failure: A Retrospective Cohort Study.\",\"authors\":\"Daniel Sykora, Nicole Olson, Robert Churchill, B Michelle Kim, Melanie Bratcher, Mohamed Elwazir, Kathleen Young, Sami Ryan, Michelle Brodin, Jan Anderson, Jeremiah Saunders, Omar Abou Ezzeddine, John Bois, John Giudicessi, Leslie Cooper, Andrew Rosenbaum\",\"doi\":\"10.1161/JAHA.124.038965\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A multidisciplinary approach improves guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) in systolic heart failure (HF), but its efficacy in patients with HF due to cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) is unreported.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>In a retrospective cohort study, we reviewed 848 patients from our institutional CS clinics, identifying those with a CS diagnosis, HF (LVEF < 50%) at index evaluation, and echocardiograms within 90 days and 11-36 months. Patients were stratified by participation in a pharmacist-led medication therapy management (MTM) program for GDMT optimization (MTM vs non-MTM [NMTM]) without randomization. Demographics, LVEF, GDMT (quantified by Kansas City Medical Optimization [KCMO] score), and immunosuppressive therapy were assessed. Primary outcomes included changes in KCMO score, LVEF, and cardiovascular event-free survival (unplanned HF hospitalization, LVAD/heart transplant, or death). The final cohort included 111 patients (median age 57 years, 34% female, 64% NYHA Class I-II); 43 (39%) were MTM and 68 (61%) were NMTM. Mean KCMO score was similar at index evaluation (MTM: 23.2; NMTM: 29.6, p=0.83). At follow-up (median 16 months), the KCMO score increased significantly in both groups (MTM: 23.2 to 74.8, p<0.001; NMTM: 29.6 to 58.7, p<0.001), but was higher in MTM (p=0.001). Mean LVEF trended towards higher values in MTM (44.4% vs 40.0%, p=0.05). The primary clinical outcome occurred in 1 MTM (2.3%) and 16 NMTM (23.5%) patients, with higher risk in NMTM (HR 11.97 [95%CI 1.58 - 90.54], p=0.002).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this retrospective cohort study, a pharmacist-led MTM program was associated with favorable GDMT optimization and lower risk of adverse cardiovascular outcomes in CS patients with HF.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54370,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the American Heart Association\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e038965\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the American Heart Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.124.038965\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Heart Association","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.124.038965","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
A Pharmacist Medication Titration Program for Patients with Cardiac Sarcoidosis and Systolic Heart Failure: A Retrospective Cohort Study.
Background: A multidisciplinary approach improves guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) in systolic heart failure (HF), but its efficacy in patients with HF due to cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) is unreported.
Methods and results: In a retrospective cohort study, we reviewed 848 patients from our institutional CS clinics, identifying those with a CS diagnosis, HF (LVEF < 50%) at index evaluation, and echocardiograms within 90 days and 11-36 months. Patients were stratified by participation in a pharmacist-led medication therapy management (MTM) program for GDMT optimization (MTM vs non-MTM [NMTM]) without randomization. Demographics, LVEF, GDMT (quantified by Kansas City Medical Optimization [KCMO] score), and immunosuppressive therapy were assessed. Primary outcomes included changes in KCMO score, LVEF, and cardiovascular event-free survival (unplanned HF hospitalization, LVAD/heart transplant, or death). The final cohort included 111 patients (median age 57 years, 34% female, 64% NYHA Class I-II); 43 (39%) were MTM and 68 (61%) were NMTM. Mean KCMO score was similar at index evaluation (MTM: 23.2; NMTM: 29.6, p=0.83). At follow-up (median 16 months), the KCMO score increased significantly in both groups (MTM: 23.2 to 74.8, p<0.001; NMTM: 29.6 to 58.7, p<0.001), but was higher in MTM (p=0.001). Mean LVEF trended towards higher values in MTM (44.4% vs 40.0%, p=0.05). The primary clinical outcome occurred in 1 MTM (2.3%) and 16 NMTM (23.5%) patients, with higher risk in NMTM (HR 11.97 [95%CI 1.58 - 90.54], p=0.002).
Conclusions: In this retrospective cohort study, a pharmacist-led MTM program was associated with favorable GDMT optimization and lower risk of adverse cardiovascular outcomes in CS patients with HF.
期刊介绍:
As an Open Access journal, JAHA - Journal of the American Heart Association is rapidly and freely available, accelerating the translation of strong science into effective practice.
JAHA is an authoritative, peer-reviewed Open Access journal focusing on cardiovascular and cerebrovascular disease. JAHA provides a global forum for basic and clinical research and timely reviews on cardiovascular disease and stroke. As an Open Access journal, its content is free on publication to read, download, and share, accelerating the translation of strong science into effective practice.