病理学家和头颈部肿瘤学家合作实施核心针活检治疗唾液腺癌的机构经验。

IF 3.2 Q2 PATHOLOGY
Kenya Kobayashi, Seiichi Yoshimoto, Go Omura, Yoshifumi Matsumoto, Azusa Sakai, Kohtaro Eguchi, Toshihiko Sakai, Yoshitaka Honma, Fumihiko Matsumoto, Masahito Kawazu, Yuki Saito, Eigitsu Ryo, Akihiko Yoshida, Yasushi Yatabe, Taisuke Mori
{"title":"病理学家和头颈部肿瘤学家合作实施核心针活检治疗唾液腺癌的机构经验。","authors":"Kenya Kobayashi, Seiichi Yoshimoto, Go Omura, Yoshifumi Matsumoto, Azusa Sakai, Kohtaro Eguchi, Toshihiko Sakai, Yoshitaka Honma, Fumihiko Matsumoto, Masahito Kawazu, Yuki Saito, Eigitsu Ryo, Akihiko Yoshida, Yasushi Yatabe, Taisuke Mori","doi":"10.1007/s12105-024-01725-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>A major problem in establishing treatment strategies for salivary gland carcinomas is the difficulty of preoperative histologic subtyping. Core needle biopsy (CNB) allows the collection of a small, intact specimens from the tumor center for detailed analysis. We evaluated the efficacy and limitations of preoperative diagnosis with CNB specimens collected using a newly developed 20-gauge needle designed to popularize its use.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Paired preoperative CNB and surgical specimens from 41 patients with malignant salivary gland tumors were retrospectively reviewed. A histologic typing platform, including morphologic and immunohistochemical evaluation and fluorescence in situ hybridization, was evaluated using CNB specimens. Biopsy specimen quality, diagnostic accuracy, and immunohistochemistry concordance rates between biopsy and surgical specimens were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In 39 of the 41 patients, CNB provided high-quality specimens, enabling adequate morphologic, immunohistologic, and genomic analyses. In two patients, high-quality CNB specimens could not be obtained due to cystic fluid and tumor firmness. The overall accuracy of correct preoperative diagnosis was 75%. The success rate of histologic subtyping and HER2 immunostaining concordance between CNB and surgical specimens was lower in carcinoma ex-pleomorphic adenoma (CXPA) than in de novo carcinoma (histologic subtyping; CXPA vs de novo carcinoma 50% vs 89%, p = 0.016, HER2 concordance; salivary duct carcinoma [SDC] ex-PA vs de novo SDC 16% vs 100%, p = 4.66E-03). No recurrence occurred due to tumor seeding after CNB.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Highly accurate histologic subtyping of salivary gland carcinomas can be performed by preoperative CNB; however, specificity can be more challenging in pathologically heterogenous tumors.</p>","PeriodicalId":47972,"journal":{"name":"Head & Neck Pathology","volume":"18 1","pages":"122"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11576705/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An Institutional Experience of Core Needle Biopsy with Cooperative Implementation by Pathologists and Head and Neck Oncologists in Salivary Gland Carcinoma.\",\"authors\":\"Kenya Kobayashi, Seiichi Yoshimoto, Go Omura, Yoshifumi Matsumoto, Azusa Sakai, Kohtaro Eguchi, Toshihiko Sakai, Yoshitaka Honma, Fumihiko Matsumoto, Masahito Kawazu, Yuki Saito, Eigitsu Ryo, Akihiko Yoshida, Yasushi Yatabe, Taisuke Mori\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12105-024-01725-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>A major problem in establishing treatment strategies for salivary gland carcinomas is the difficulty of preoperative histologic subtyping. Core needle biopsy (CNB) allows the collection of a small, intact specimens from the tumor center for detailed analysis. We evaluated the efficacy and limitations of preoperative diagnosis with CNB specimens collected using a newly developed 20-gauge needle designed to popularize its use.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Paired preoperative CNB and surgical specimens from 41 patients with malignant salivary gland tumors were retrospectively reviewed. A histologic typing platform, including morphologic and immunohistochemical evaluation and fluorescence in situ hybridization, was evaluated using CNB specimens. Biopsy specimen quality, diagnostic accuracy, and immunohistochemistry concordance rates between biopsy and surgical specimens were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In 39 of the 41 patients, CNB provided high-quality specimens, enabling adequate morphologic, immunohistologic, and genomic analyses. In two patients, high-quality CNB specimens could not be obtained due to cystic fluid and tumor firmness. The overall accuracy of correct preoperative diagnosis was 75%. The success rate of histologic subtyping and HER2 immunostaining concordance between CNB and surgical specimens was lower in carcinoma ex-pleomorphic adenoma (CXPA) than in de novo carcinoma (histologic subtyping; CXPA vs de novo carcinoma 50% vs 89%, p = 0.016, HER2 concordance; salivary duct carcinoma [SDC] ex-PA vs de novo SDC 16% vs 100%, p = 4.66E-03). No recurrence occurred due to tumor seeding after CNB.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Highly accurate histologic subtyping of salivary gland carcinomas can be performed by preoperative CNB; however, specificity can be more challenging in pathologically heterogenous tumors.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47972,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Head & Neck Pathology\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"122\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11576705/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Head & Neck Pathology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12105-024-01725-3\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PATHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Head & Neck Pathology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12105-024-01725-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:制定唾液腺癌治疗策略的一个主要问题是难以在术前进行组织学亚型鉴定。核心针活检(CNB)可从肿瘤中心采集小而完整的标本进行详细分析。我们评估了使用新开发的 20 号针头采集的 CNB 标本进行术前诊断的有效性和局限性,旨在推广其使用:方法: 我们对 41 名唾液腺恶性肿瘤患者的术前 CNB 标本和手术标本进行了回顾性研究。使用 CNB 标本评估了组织学分型平台,包括形态学和免疫组化评估以及荧光原位杂交。对活检标本的质量、诊断准确性以及活检与手术标本之间的免疫组化一致率进行了分析:结果:在 41 名患者中,39 名患者的 CNB 标本质量较高,能够进行充分的形态学、免疫组织学和基因组分析。有两名患者因囊液和肿瘤坚硬而无法获得高质量的 CNB 标本。术前诊断的总体正确率为 75%。涎管癌(CXPA)的组织学亚型和 CNB 与手术标本的 HER2 免疫染色一致性的成功率低于新生癌(组织学亚型;CXPA vs 新生癌 50% vs 89%,p = 0.016,HER2 一致性;涎管癌 [SDC] ex-PA vs 新生 SDC 16% vs 100%, p = 4.66E-03)。CNB术后未发生因肿瘤播种导致的复发:结论:术前 CNB 可以对唾液腺癌进行高度准确的组织学亚型分类;但对于病理异质性肿瘤,特异性可能更具挑战性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An Institutional Experience of Core Needle Biopsy with Cooperative Implementation by Pathologists and Head and Neck Oncologists in Salivary Gland Carcinoma.

Purpose: A major problem in establishing treatment strategies for salivary gland carcinomas is the difficulty of preoperative histologic subtyping. Core needle biopsy (CNB) allows the collection of a small, intact specimens from the tumor center for detailed analysis. We evaluated the efficacy and limitations of preoperative diagnosis with CNB specimens collected using a newly developed 20-gauge needle designed to popularize its use.

Methods: Paired preoperative CNB and surgical specimens from 41 patients with malignant salivary gland tumors were retrospectively reviewed. A histologic typing platform, including morphologic and immunohistochemical evaluation and fluorescence in situ hybridization, was evaluated using CNB specimens. Biopsy specimen quality, diagnostic accuracy, and immunohistochemistry concordance rates between biopsy and surgical specimens were analyzed.

Results: In 39 of the 41 patients, CNB provided high-quality specimens, enabling adequate morphologic, immunohistologic, and genomic analyses. In two patients, high-quality CNB specimens could not be obtained due to cystic fluid and tumor firmness. The overall accuracy of correct preoperative diagnosis was 75%. The success rate of histologic subtyping and HER2 immunostaining concordance between CNB and surgical specimens was lower in carcinoma ex-pleomorphic adenoma (CXPA) than in de novo carcinoma (histologic subtyping; CXPA vs de novo carcinoma 50% vs 89%, p = 0.016, HER2 concordance; salivary duct carcinoma [SDC] ex-PA vs de novo SDC 16% vs 100%, p = 4.66E-03). No recurrence occurred due to tumor seeding after CNB.

Conclusions: Highly accurate histologic subtyping of salivary gland carcinomas can be performed by preoperative CNB; however, specificity can be more challenging in pathologically heterogenous tumors.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
9.50%
发文量
99
期刊介绍: Head & Neck Pathology presents scholarly papers, reviews and symposia that cover the spectrum of human surgical pathology within the anatomic zones of the oral cavity, sinonasal tract, larynx, hypopharynx, salivary gland, ear and temporal bone, and neck. The journal publishes rapid developments in new diagnostic criteria, intraoperative consultation, immunohistochemical studies, molecular techniques, genetic analyses, diagnostic aids, experimental pathology, cytology, radiographic imaging, and application of uniform terminology to allow practitioners to continue to maintain and expand their knowledge in the subspecialty of head and neck pathology. Coverage of practical application to daily clinical practice is supported with proceedings and symposia from international societies and academies devoted to this field. Single-blind peer review The journal follows a single-blind review procedure, where the reviewers are aware of the names and affiliations of the authors, but the reviewer reports provided to authors are anonymous. Single-blind peer review is the traditional model of peer review that many reviewers are comfortable with, and it facilitates a dispassionate critique of a manuscript.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信