Ji-Xian Ma, Zhuo-Yi Zhang, Rong Di, Jia-Jie Yang, Si-Wen Tian, Ya-Zhou Qin, Wan-Hu Zhang, Jian-Qin Lei, Qiu-Ping Liu, Jing-Ming Li
{"title":"用于老年性黄斑变性脉络膜新生血管成像的扫源和光谱域 OCTA 比较研究。","authors":"Ji-Xian Ma, Zhuo-Yi Zhang, Rong Di, Jia-Jie Yang, Si-Wen Tian, Ya-Zhou Qin, Wan-Hu Zhang, Jian-Qin Lei, Qiu-Ping Liu, Jing-Ming Li","doi":"10.18240/ijo.2024.11.13","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To compare the differences of choroidal neovascularization (CNV) measurements between swept-source and spectral-domain optical coherence tomography angiography (SS-OCTA and SD-OCTA) in neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) and the imaging reliability of the two devices.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Prospective comparative study. SS-OCTA and SD-OCTA were used to scan the same eye with the modes of 3×3 and 6×6 mm<sup>2</sup> centered on the neovascularization. Only qualified images were chosen and the border of CNV was manually delineated by two graders independently. The area of CNV (ACNV), vascular perfusion density (PD), and vessel length density (VLD) within the delineation were calculated using Image J. The differences of CNV measurements between the two OCTA devices were compared using Bland-Altman analysis. The agreement between the two graders on the measurements of each device was compared using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 18 patients (22 eyes) with nAMD were included. The measurements of ACNV, PD, and VLD were 7.247±4.586 and 4.901±3.741 mm<sup>2</sup>, 43.202±9.636 and 34.904±10.489, 6.339±1.228 and 5.908±1.741 mm<sup>-1</sup> for SS-OCTA and SD-OCTA, respectively. The differences between the two devices were 2.346±3.030 mm<sup>2</sup> (<i>Z</i>=-3.782, <i>P</i><0.0001), 8.298±14.160 (<i>Z</i>=-2.419, <i>P</i>=0.016), and 0.431±2.114 mm<sup>-1</sup> (<i>Z</i>=-0.828, <i>P</i>=0.408) for ACNV, PD and VLD, respectively. The ICC between two graders were 0.893 (<i>P</i><0.001), 0.902 (<i>P</i><0.001), 0.885 (<i>P</i><0.001) for ACNV, PD, VLD in SS-OCTA, and 0.971 (<i>P</i><0.001), 0.976 (<i>P</i><0.001), 0.973 (<i>P</i><0.001) in SD-OCTA, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both OCTA devices have high imaging reliability. Compared with SD-OCTA, SS-OCTA has a larger ACNV measurements, but doesn't show better resolution of internal vessels of CNV and well signal strength.</p>","PeriodicalId":14312,"journal":{"name":"International journal of ophthalmology","volume":"17 11","pages":"2067-2073"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11528287/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative study between swept-source and spectral-domain OCTA for imaging of choroidal neovascularization in age-related macular degeneration.\",\"authors\":\"Ji-Xian Ma, Zhuo-Yi Zhang, Rong Di, Jia-Jie Yang, Si-Wen Tian, Ya-Zhou Qin, Wan-Hu Zhang, Jian-Qin Lei, Qiu-Ping Liu, Jing-Ming Li\",\"doi\":\"10.18240/ijo.2024.11.13\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To compare the differences of choroidal neovascularization (CNV) measurements between swept-source and spectral-domain optical coherence tomography angiography (SS-OCTA and SD-OCTA) in neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) and the imaging reliability of the two devices.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Prospective comparative study. SS-OCTA and SD-OCTA were used to scan the same eye with the modes of 3×3 and 6×6 mm<sup>2</sup> centered on the neovascularization. Only qualified images were chosen and the border of CNV was manually delineated by two graders independently. The area of CNV (ACNV), vascular perfusion density (PD), and vessel length density (VLD) within the delineation were calculated using Image J. The differences of CNV measurements between the two OCTA devices were compared using Bland-Altman analysis. The agreement between the two graders on the measurements of each device was compared using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 18 patients (22 eyes) with nAMD were included. The measurements of ACNV, PD, and VLD were 7.247±4.586 and 4.901±3.741 mm<sup>2</sup>, 43.202±9.636 and 34.904±10.489, 6.339±1.228 and 5.908±1.741 mm<sup>-1</sup> for SS-OCTA and SD-OCTA, respectively. The differences between the two devices were 2.346±3.030 mm<sup>2</sup> (<i>Z</i>=-3.782, <i>P</i><0.0001), 8.298±14.160 (<i>Z</i>=-2.419, <i>P</i>=0.016), and 0.431±2.114 mm<sup>-1</sup> (<i>Z</i>=-0.828, <i>P</i>=0.408) for ACNV, PD and VLD, respectively. The ICC between two graders were 0.893 (<i>P</i><0.001), 0.902 (<i>P</i><0.001), 0.885 (<i>P</i><0.001) for ACNV, PD, VLD in SS-OCTA, and 0.971 (<i>P</i><0.001), 0.976 (<i>P</i><0.001), 0.973 (<i>P</i><0.001) in SD-OCTA, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both OCTA devices have high imaging reliability. Compared with SD-OCTA, SS-OCTA has a larger ACNV measurements, but doesn't show better resolution of internal vessels of CNV and well signal strength.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14312,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of ophthalmology\",\"volume\":\"17 11\",\"pages\":\"2067-2073\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11528287/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of ophthalmology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18240/ijo.2024.11.13\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18240/ijo.2024.11.13","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comparative study between swept-source and spectral-domain OCTA for imaging of choroidal neovascularization in age-related macular degeneration.
Aim: To compare the differences of choroidal neovascularization (CNV) measurements between swept-source and spectral-domain optical coherence tomography angiography (SS-OCTA and SD-OCTA) in neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) and the imaging reliability of the two devices.
Methods: Prospective comparative study. SS-OCTA and SD-OCTA were used to scan the same eye with the modes of 3×3 and 6×6 mm2 centered on the neovascularization. Only qualified images were chosen and the border of CNV was manually delineated by two graders independently. The area of CNV (ACNV), vascular perfusion density (PD), and vessel length density (VLD) within the delineation were calculated using Image J. The differences of CNV measurements between the two OCTA devices were compared using Bland-Altman analysis. The agreement between the two graders on the measurements of each device was compared using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC).
Results: A total of 18 patients (22 eyes) with nAMD were included. The measurements of ACNV, PD, and VLD were 7.247±4.586 and 4.901±3.741 mm2, 43.202±9.636 and 34.904±10.489, 6.339±1.228 and 5.908±1.741 mm-1 for SS-OCTA and SD-OCTA, respectively. The differences between the two devices were 2.346±3.030 mm2 (Z=-3.782, P<0.0001), 8.298±14.160 (Z=-2.419, P=0.016), and 0.431±2.114 mm-1 (Z=-0.828, P=0.408) for ACNV, PD and VLD, respectively. The ICC between two graders were 0.893 (P<0.001), 0.902 (P<0.001), 0.885 (P<0.001) for ACNV, PD, VLD in SS-OCTA, and 0.971 (P<0.001), 0.976 (P<0.001), 0.973 (P<0.001) in SD-OCTA, respectively.
Conclusion: Both OCTA devices have high imaging reliability. Compared with SD-OCTA, SS-OCTA has a larger ACNV measurements, but doesn't show better resolution of internal vessels of CNV and well signal strength.
期刊介绍：
· International Journal of Ophthalmology-IJO (English edition) is a global ophthalmological scientific publication
and a peer-reviewed open access periodical (ISSN 2222-3959 print, ISSN 2227-4898 online).
This journal is sponsored by Chinese Medical Association Xi’an Branch and obtains guidance and support from
WHO and ICO (International Council of Ophthalmology). It has been indexed in SCIE, PubMed,
PubMed-Central, Chemical Abstracts, Scopus, EMBASE , and DOAJ. IJO JCR IF in 2017 is 1.166.
IJO was established in 2008, with editorial office in Xi’an, China. It is a monthly publication. General Scientific
Advisors include Prof. Hugh Taylor (President of ICO); Prof.Bruce Spivey (Immediate Past President of ICO);
Prof.Mark Tso (Ex-Vice President of ICO) and Prof.Daiming Fan (Academician and Vice President,
Chinese Academy of Engineering.
International Scientific Advisors include Prof. Serge Resnikoff (WHO Senior Speciatist for Prevention of
blindness), Prof. Chi-Chao Chan (National Eye Institute, USA) and Prof. Richard L Abbott (Ex-President of
AAO/PAAO) et al.
Honorary Editors-in-Chief: Prof. Li-Xin Xie(Academician of Chinese Academy of
Engineering/Honorary President of Chinese Ophthalmological Society); Prof. Dennis Lam (President of APAO) and
Prof. Xiao-Xin Li (Ex-President of Chinese Ophthalmological Society).
Chief Editor: Prof. Xiu-Wen Hu (President of IJO Press).
Editors-in-Chief: Prof. Yan-Nian Hui (Ex-Director, Eye Institute of Chinese PLA) and
Prof. George Chiou (Founding chief editor of Journal of Ocular Pharmacology & Therapeutics).
Associate Editors-in-Chief include:
Prof. Ning-Li Wang (President Elect of APAO);
Prof. Ke Yao (President of Chinese Ophthalmological Society) ;
Prof.William Smiddy (Bascom Palmer Eye instituteUSA) ;
Prof.Joel Schuman (President of Association of University Professors of Ophthalmology,USA);
Prof.Yizhi Liu (Vice President of Chinese Ophtlalmology Society);
Prof.Yu-Sheng Wang (Director of Eye Institute of Chinese PLA);
Prof.Ling-Yun Cheng (Director of Ocular Pharmacology, Shiley Eye Center, USA).
IJO accepts contributions in English from all over the world. It includes mainly original articles and review articles,
both basic and clinical papers.
Instruction is Welcome Contribution is Welcome Citation is Welcome
Cooperation organization
International Council of Ophthalmology(ICO), PubMed, PMC, American Academy of Ophthalmology, Asia-Pacific, Thomson Reuters, The Charlesworth Group, Crossref,Scopus,Publons, DOAJ etc.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
