Jonathan M R French, Kevin Deere, Michael R Whitehouse, Derek J Pegg, Enrico Ciminello, Riccardo Valentini, Marina Torre, Keijo Mäkelä, Anne Lübbeke, Eric R Bohm, Anne Marie Fenstad, Ove Furnes, Geir Hallan, Jinny Willis, Søren Overgaard, Ola Rolfson, Adrian Sayers
{"title":"国家髋关节和膝关节置换登记册的完整性。","authors":"Jonathan M R French, Kevin Deere, Michael R Whitehouse, Derek J Pegg, Enrico Ciminello, Riccardo Valentini, Marina Torre, Keijo Mäkelä, Anne Lübbeke, Eric R Bohm, Anne Marie Fenstad, Ove Furnes, Geir Hallan, Jinny Willis, Søren Overgaard, Ola Rolfson, Adrian Sayers","doi":"10.2340/17453674.2024.42303","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong> National joint replacement registries were developed for prospective monitoring of outcomes and post-market surveillance of implants. Increasingly registry data informs practice. However, analysis of a registry can only be as good as the data it captures on the population of interest. We aimed to analyze completeness of reporting of hip and knee replacement procedures for all national registries worldwide.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed annual reports and data provided following written requests to all active national hip and knee replacement registries. Coverage was defined as the proportion of hospitals in the country that participate in the registry. Procedure completeness was defined as the proportion of procedures successfully captured by the registry.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> 14 national registries were included, spanning years 2004 to 2022. Coverage was complete in 10. Median procedure completeness for primary hip and knee replacement across all years was 96.5% (interquartile range [IQR] 94.0-97.7%). Median procedure completeness for revisions was 88.5% (IQR 81.0-92.5%). The terminology used and method of calculation of completeness estimates in the registries were variable.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> National hip and knee replacement registry data generally reflects excellent coverage (full in 10 of 14 registries) and completeness (primary procedures 96.5% and revisions 88.5%) over the last 2 decades.</p>","PeriodicalId":6916,"journal":{"name":"Acta Orthopaedica","volume":"95 ","pages":"654-660"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11574073/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The completeness of national hip and knee replacement registers.\",\"authors\":\"Jonathan M R French, Kevin Deere, Michael R Whitehouse, Derek J Pegg, Enrico Ciminello, Riccardo Valentini, Marina Torre, Keijo Mäkelä, Anne Lübbeke, Eric R Bohm, Anne Marie Fenstad, Ove Furnes, Geir Hallan, Jinny Willis, Søren Overgaard, Ola Rolfson, Adrian Sayers\",\"doi\":\"10.2340/17453674.2024.42303\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong> National joint replacement registries were developed for prospective monitoring of outcomes and post-market surveillance of implants. Increasingly registry data informs practice. However, analysis of a registry can only be as good as the data it captures on the population of interest. We aimed to analyze completeness of reporting of hip and knee replacement procedures for all national registries worldwide.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed annual reports and data provided following written requests to all active national hip and knee replacement registries. Coverage was defined as the proportion of hospitals in the country that participate in the registry. Procedure completeness was defined as the proportion of procedures successfully captured by the registry.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> 14 national registries were included, spanning years 2004 to 2022. Coverage was complete in 10. Median procedure completeness for primary hip and knee replacement across all years was 96.5% (interquartile range [IQR] 94.0-97.7%). Median procedure completeness for revisions was 88.5% (IQR 81.0-92.5%). The terminology used and method of calculation of completeness estimates in the registries were variable.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> National hip and knee replacement registry data generally reflects excellent coverage (full in 10 of 14 registries) and completeness (primary procedures 96.5% and revisions 88.5%) over the last 2 decades.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":6916,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Orthopaedica\",\"volume\":\"95 \",\"pages\":\"654-660\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11574073/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Orthopaedica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2340/17453674.2024.42303\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Orthopaedica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2340/17453674.2024.42303","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
The completeness of national hip and knee replacement registers.
Background and purpose: National joint replacement registries were developed for prospective monitoring of outcomes and post-market surveillance of implants. Increasingly registry data informs practice. However, analysis of a registry can only be as good as the data it captures on the population of interest. We aimed to analyze completeness of reporting of hip and knee replacement procedures for all national registries worldwide.
Methods: We analyzed annual reports and data provided following written requests to all active national hip and knee replacement registries. Coverage was defined as the proportion of hospitals in the country that participate in the registry. Procedure completeness was defined as the proportion of procedures successfully captured by the registry.
Results: 14 national registries were included, spanning years 2004 to 2022. Coverage was complete in 10. Median procedure completeness for primary hip and knee replacement across all years was 96.5% (interquartile range [IQR] 94.0-97.7%). Median procedure completeness for revisions was 88.5% (IQR 81.0-92.5%). The terminology used and method of calculation of completeness estimates in the registries were variable.
Conclusion: National hip and knee replacement registry data generally reflects excellent coverage (full in 10 of 14 registries) and completeness (primary procedures 96.5% and revisions 88.5%) over the last 2 decades.
期刊介绍:
Acta Orthopaedica (previously Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica) presents original articles of basic research interest, as well as clinical studies in the field of orthopedics and related sub disciplines. Ever since the journal was founded in 1930, by a group of Scandinavian orthopedic surgeons, the journal has been published for an international audience. Acta Orthopaedica is owned by the Nordic Orthopaedic Federation and is the official publication of this federation.