基于 PLANDTL 基准实验的快堆被动散热系统数值建模方法比较研究

IF 1.9 3区 工程技术 Q1 NUCLEAR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Haijie Song , Yuhao Zhang , Haiqi Zhao , Danting Sui , Daogang Lu
{"title":"基于 PLANDTL 基准实验的快堆被动散热系统数值建模方法比较研究","authors":"Haijie Song ,&nbsp;Yuhao Zhang ,&nbsp;Haiqi Zhao ,&nbsp;Danting Sui ,&nbsp;Daogang Lu","doi":"10.1016/j.anucene.2024.111044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The Direct Reactor Auxiliary Cooling System (DRACS) is an innovative Passive Decay Heat Removal System (PDHRS) designed for pool-type Sodium-cooled Fast Reactors (SFR). It comprises an independent heat exchanger submerged in a sodium pool, connected to an air cooling system via a sodium loop. To validate its effectiveness, several studies have been conducted. Initially, system analysis codes were employed; however, they struggled to capture the detailed 3-D thermal–hydraulic phenomena within the sodium pool. The advent of computational fluid dynamics (CFD) has enabled a more comprehensive study of thermal–hydraulic behaviors in sodium pools and reactor cores, which include multiple fuel subassemblies and bundles. Full CFD simulations require substantial computational resources. To address these challenges, alternative methods have been proposed, such as using porous media to represent fuel bundles and employing a partial system + partial CFD approach instead of full CFD. Despite the development of these modeling methods, comprehensive comparisons assessing their applicability and uncertainty remain lacking. This study conducts four types of numerical simulations based on the aforementioned method pairs—“Bundles/Porous Media” and “Full-CFD/System + CFD”—using the PLANDTL benchmark experiment to evaluate their effectiveness. The “System + CFD” coupled approach demonstrated superior accuracy in predicting DRACS operation and its variation boundaries, with an average error of less than 4.2 %. Both models successfully captured the overall thermal–hydraulic characteristics. The rod bundles model provided more detailed understanding of natural circulation flow paths within the core and yielded more accurate temperature distribution, with average error below 4.0 %. Additionally, the simulations accurately captured core outlet backflow and inter-wrapper flow paths. The analysis revealed comprehensive temperature stratification in the upper plenum, resulting in detailed 3-D temperature distributions. These findings offer valuable insights for optimizing calculation and modeling methods and elucidate critical thermal–hydraulic characteristics essential for the innovative design of DRACS in pool-type SFRs.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8006,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Nuclear Energy","volume":"212 ","pages":"Article 111044"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison research on numerical modeling methods for the passive heat removal system of fast reactors based on PLANDTL benchmark experiment\",\"authors\":\"Haijie Song ,&nbsp;Yuhao Zhang ,&nbsp;Haiqi Zhao ,&nbsp;Danting Sui ,&nbsp;Daogang Lu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.anucene.2024.111044\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The Direct Reactor Auxiliary Cooling System (DRACS) is an innovative Passive Decay Heat Removal System (PDHRS) designed for pool-type Sodium-cooled Fast Reactors (SFR). It comprises an independent heat exchanger submerged in a sodium pool, connected to an air cooling system via a sodium loop. To validate its effectiveness, several studies have been conducted. Initially, system analysis codes were employed; however, they struggled to capture the detailed 3-D thermal–hydraulic phenomena within the sodium pool. The advent of computational fluid dynamics (CFD) has enabled a more comprehensive study of thermal–hydraulic behaviors in sodium pools and reactor cores, which include multiple fuel subassemblies and bundles. Full CFD simulations require substantial computational resources. To address these challenges, alternative methods have been proposed, such as using porous media to represent fuel bundles and employing a partial system + partial CFD approach instead of full CFD. Despite the development of these modeling methods, comprehensive comparisons assessing their applicability and uncertainty remain lacking. This study conducts four types of numerical simulations based on the aforementioned method pairs—“Bundles/Porous Media” and “Full-CFD/System + CFD”—using the PLANDTL benchmark experiment to evaluate their effectiveness. The “System + CFD” coupled approach demonstrated superior accuracy in predicting DRACS operation and its variation boundaries, with an average error of less than 4.2 %. Both models successfully captured the overall thermal–hydraulic characteristics. The rod bundles model provided more detailed understanding of natural circulation flow paths within the core and yielded more accurate temperature distribution, with average error below 4.0 %. Additionally, the simulations accurately captured core outlet backflow and inter-wrapper flow paths. The analysis revealed comprehensive temperature stratification in the upper plenum, resulting in detailed 3-D temperature distributions. These findings offer valuable insights for optimizing calculation and modeling methods and elucidate critical thermal–hydraulic characteristics essential for the innovative design of DRACS in pool-type SFRs.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8006,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Nuclear Energy\",\"volume\":\"212 \",\"pages\":\"Article 111044\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Nuclear Energy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306454924007072\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NUCLEAR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Nuclear Energy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306454924007072","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NUCLEAR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

直接反应堆辅助冷却系统(DRACS)是一种创新的被动衰变热量去除系统(PDHRS),设计用于钠池冷却快堆(SFR)。它包括一个浸没在钠池中的独立热交换器,通过钠回路与空气冷却系统相连。为验证其有效性,已进行了多项研究。最初采用的是系统分析代码,但这些代码难以捕捉钠池内详细的三维热流体力学现象。计算流体动力学(CFD)的出现使人们能够更全面地研究钠池和反应堆堆芯(包括多个燃料组件和燃料束)内的热流体力学行为。全面的 CFD 模拟需要大量的计算资源。为了应对这些挑战,人们提出了一些替代方法,例如使用多孔介质来表示燃料束,以及采用部分系统 + 部分 CFD 方法来代替全 CFD。尽管这些建模方法得到了发展,但仍缺乏对其适用性和不确定性的全面比较评估。本研究基于上述方法对--"捆绑/多孔介质 "和 "全 CFD/系统 + CFD"--使用 PLANDTL 基准试验进行了四种类型的数值模拟,以评估它们的有效性。系统 + CFD "耦合方法在预测 DRACS 运行及其变化边界方面表现出更高的准确性,平均误差小于 4.2%。两种模型都成功地捕捉到了整体热-水特性。棒束模型提供了对岩心内自然循环流动路径更详细的了解,并产生了更精确的温度分布,平均误差低于 4.0%。此外,模拟还准确捕捉到了岩心出口回流和包层间的流动路径。分析揭示了上部全腔的全面温度分层,得出了详细的三维温度分布。这些发现为优化计算和建模方法提供了宝贵的见解,并阐明了池式 SFR 中 DRACS 创新设计所必需的关键热-水特性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison research on numerical modeling methods for the passive heat removal system of fast reactors based on PLANDTL benchmark experiment
The Direct Reactor Auxiliary Cooling System (DRACS) is an innovative Passive Decay Heat Removal System (PDHRS) designed for pool-type Sodium-cooled Fast Reactors (SFR). It comprises an independent heat exchanger submerged in a sodium pool, connected to an air cooling system via a sodium loop. To validate its effectiveness, several studies have been conducted. Initially, system analysis codes were employed; however, they struggled to capture the detailed 3-D thermal–hydraulic phenomena within the sodium pool. The advent of computational fluid dynamics (CFD) has enabled a more comprehensive study of thermal–hydraulic behaviors in sodium pools and reactor cores, which include multiple fuel subassemblies and bundles. Full CFD simulations require substantial computational resources. To address these challenges, alternative methods have been proposed, such as using porous media to represent fuel bundles and employing a partial system + partial CFD approach instead of full CFD. Despite the development of these modeling methods, comprehensive comparisons assessing their applicability and uncertainty remain lacking. This study conducts four types of numerical simulations based on the aforementioned method pairs—“Bundles/Porous Media” and “Full-CFD/System + CFD”—using the PLANDTL benchmark experiment to evaluate their effectiveness. The “System + CFD” coupled approach demonstrated superior accuracy in predicting DRACS operation and its variation boundaries, with an average error of less than 4.2 %. Both models successfully captured the overall thermal–hydraulic characteristics. The rod bundles model provided more detailed understanding of natural circulation flow paths within the core and yielded more accurate temperature distribution, with average error below 4.0 %. Additionally, the simulations accurately captured core outlet backflow and inter-wrapper flow paths. The analysis revealed comprehensive temperature stratification in the upper plenum, resulting in detailed 3-D temperature distributions. These findings offer valuable insights for optimizing calculation and modeling methods and elucidate critical thermal–hydraulic characteristics essential for the innovative design of DRACS in pool-type SFRs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of Nuclear Energy
Annals of Nuclear Energy 工程技术-核科学技术
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
21.10%
发文量
632
审稿时长
7.3 months
期刊介绍: Annals of Nuclear Energy provides an international medium for the communication of original research, ideas and developments in all areas of the field of nuclear energy science and technology. Its scope embraces nuclear fuel reserves, fuel cycles and cost, materials, processing, system and component technology (fission only), design and optimization, direct conversion of nuclear energy sources, environmental control, reactor physics, heat transfer and fluid dynamics, structural analysis, fuel management, future developments, nuclear fuel and safety, nuclear aerosol, neutron physics, computer technology (both software and hardware), risk assessment, radioactive waste disposal and reactor thermal hydraulics. Papers submitted to Annals need to demonstrate a clear link to nuclear power generation/nuclear engineering. Papers which deal with pure nuclear physics, pure health physics, imaging, or attenuation and shielding properties of concretes and various geological materials are not within the scope of the journal. Also, papers that deal with policy or economics are not within the scope of the journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信