管理共同利益的发展议程 - 展开规划方法：芬兰万塔案例研究

IF 6 1区经济学 Q1 URBAN STUDIES

Cities Pub Date : 2024-11-16 DOI:10.1016/j.cities.2024.105581

Mari Jaakonaho , Zinette Bergman

{"title":"管理共同利益的发展议程 - 展开规划方法：芬兰万塔案例研究","authors":"Mari Jaakonaho , Zinette Bergman","doi":"10.1016/j.cities.2024.105581","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Contemporary debates suggest that market liberalisation has led to an unfavourable urban planning environment that impedes the ability of public authorities to pursue the common good. To study the significance and potential impact of this, our central line of inquiry was to examine how the common good is manifested within statutory plans in Vantaa, Finland, between 2015 and 2019. Using a mixed methods framework coupled with a refined typology of planning approaches, our findings demonstrate that the common good is orchestrated through three development agendas: public, private and common. In doing so, this study provides insights into the scholarly discourse surrounding the impact of market liberalisation on planning and highlights the importance of developing comprehensive strategies to promote the common good in urban planning.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48405,"journal":{"name":"Cities","volume":"156 ","pages":"Article 105581"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development agendas governing the common good – Unfolding planning approaches: A case study of Vantaa, Finland\",\"authors\":\"Mari Jaakonaho , Zinette Bergman\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cities.2024.105581\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Contemporary debates suggest that market liberalisation has led to an unfavourable urban planning environment that impedes the ability of public authorities to pursue the common good. To study the significance and potential impact of this, our central line of inquiry was to examine how the common good is manifested within statutory plans in Vantaa, Finland, between 2015 and 2019. Using a mixed methods framework coupled with a refined typology of planning approaches, our findings demonstrate that the common good is orchestrated through three development agendas: public, private and common. In doing so, this study provides insights into the scholarly discourse surrounding the impact of market liberalisation on planning and highlights the importance of developing comprehensive strategies to promote the common good in urban planning.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48405,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cities\",\"volume\":\"156 \",\"pages\":\"Article 105581\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cities\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264275124007959\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"URBAN STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cities","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264275124007959","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"URBAN STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

当代的争论表明，市场自由化导致了不利的城市规划环境，阻碍了公共机构追求共同利益的能力。为了研究这种情况的意义和潜在影响，我们的核心思路是研究芬兰万塔在 2015 年至 2019 年间的法定规划中如何体现共同利益。我们采用了混合方法框架，并对规划方法进行了细化分类，研究结果表明，共同利益是通过公共、私人和共同三个发展议程来协调的。因此，本研究为围绕市场自由化对规划影响的学术讨论提供了见解，并强调了制定综合战略以促进城市规划中共同利益的重要性。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Development agendas governing the common good – Unfolding planning approaches: A case study of Vantaa, Finland

Contemporary debates suggest that market liberalisation has led to an unfavourable urban planning environment that impedes the ability of public authorities to pursue the common good. To study the significance and potential impact of this, our central line of inquiry was to examine how the common good is manifested within statutory plans in Vantaa, Finland, between 2015 and 2019. Using a mixed methods framework coupled with a refined typology of planning approaches, our findings demonstrate that the common good is orchestrated through three development agendas: public, private and common. In doing so, this study provides insights into the scholarly discourse surrounding the impact of market liberalisation on planning and highlights the importance of developing comprehensive strategies to promote the common good in urban planning.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Cities URBAN STUDIES-

CiteScore

11.20

自引率

9.00%

发文量

517

期刊介绍： Cities offers a comprehensive range of articles on all aspects of urban policy. It provides an international and interdisciplinary platform for the exchange of ideas and information between urban planners and policy makers from national and local government, non-government organizations, academia and consultancy. The primary aims of the journal are to analyse and assess past and present urban development and management as a reflection of effective, ineffective and non-existent planning policies; and the promotion of the implementation of appropriate urban policies in both the developed and the developing world.