确定性提高了 "诚实-谦逊 "和 "黑暗三合会 "特质对作弊行为的预测效力

IF 3.2 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL
David Santos , Arsham Ghodsinia , Blanca Requero , Dilney Gonçalves , Pablo Briñol , Richard E. Petty
{"title":"确定性提高了 \"诚实-谦逊 \"和 \"黑暗三合会 \"特质对作弊行为的预测效力","authors":"David Santos ,&nbsp;Arsham Ghodsinia ,&nbsp;Blanca Requero ,&nbsp;Dilney Gonçalves ,&nbsp;Pablo Briñol ,&nbsp;Richard E. Petty","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2024.104694","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This research examined the extent to which certainty can strengthen the relationship between individual differences and cheating behavior. In the first two studies, participants completed the Honesty-Humility or the Dark Triad scales. Then, they rated the certainty they had in their responses to each of those two inventories. In the third study, participants completed both scales within the same experimental design and were randomly assigned to a certainty vs. doubt condition. As the dependent variables, we used different cheating outcomes across studies. As predicted, the link between these two traits and cheating behavior was greater for participants with higher levels of certainty in their responses to the inventories (Studies 1 and 2) or for those assigned to the certainty (vs. doubt) condition (Study 3). Incorporating the certainty with which individuals hold their traits contributes to enhancing the predictive validity of personality measures relevant to cheating.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48441,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","volume":"116 ","pages":"Article 104694"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Certainty improves the predictive validity of Honesty-Humility and Dark Triad traits on cheating behavior\",\"authors\":\"David Santos ,&nbsp;Arsham Ghodsinia ,&nbsp;Blanca Requero ,&nbsp;Dilney Gonçalves ,&nbsp;Pablo Briñol ,&nbsp;Richard E. Petty\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jesp.2024.104694\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This research examined the extent to which certainty can strengthen the relationship between individual differences and cheating behavior. In the first two studies, participants completed the Honesty-Humility or the Dark Triad scales. Then, they rated the certainty they had in their responses to each of those two inventories. In the third study, participants completed both scales within the same experimental design and were randomly assigned to a certainty vs. doubt condition. As the dependent variables, we used different cheating outcomes across studies. As predicted, the link between these two traits and cheating behavior was greater for participants with higher levels of certainty in their responses to the inventories (Studies 1 and 2) or for those assigned to the certainty (vs. doubt) condition (Study 3). Incorporating the certainty with which individuals hold their traits contributes to enhancing the predictive validity of personality measures relevant to cheating.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48441,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology\",\"volume\":\"116 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104694\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022103124001070\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022103124001070","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究探讨了确定性在多大程度上可以加强个体差异与作弊行为之间的关系。在前两项研究中,参与者完成了诚实-谦逊或黑暗三合会量表。然后,他们分别对自己对这两个量表的回答的确定性进行评分。在第三项研究中,受试者在相同的实验设计中完成了两个量表,并被随机分配到确定与怀疑条件下。作为因变量,我们在各项研究中使用了不同的作弊结果。正如我们所预测的那样,这两种特质与作弊行为之间的联系对于那些对量表的回答具有较高确定性的参与者(研究 1 和研究 2)或那些被分配到确定(与怀疑)条件下的参与者(研究 3)来说更大。纳入个人对其特质的确定性有助于提高与作弊相关的人格测量的预测有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Certainty improves the predictive validity of Honesty-Humility and Dark Triad traits on cheating behavior
This research examined the extent to which certainty can strengthen the relationship between individual differences and cheating behavior. In the first two studies, participants completed the Honesty-Humility or the Dark Triad scales. Then, they rated the certainty they had in their responses to each of those two inventories. In the third study, participants completed both scales within the same experimental design and were randomly assigned to a certainty vs. doubt condition. As the dependent variables, we used different cheating outcomes across studies. As predicted, the link between these two traits and cheating behavior was greater for participants with higher levels of certainty in their responses to the inventories (Studies 1 and 2) or for those assigned to the certainty (vs. doubt) condition (Study 3). Incorporating the certainty with which individuals hold their traits contributes to enhancing the predictive validity of personality measures relevant to cheating.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
2.90%
发文量
134
期刊介绍: The Journal of Experimental Social Psychology publishes original research and theory on human social behavior and related phenomena. The journal emphasizes empirical, conceptually based research that advances an understanding of important social psychological processes. The journal also publishes literature reviews, theoretical analyses, and methodological comments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信