核能利用与减排收益预期:来自部分利用核能国家经济轨迹的经验证据

IF 3.3 3区 工程技术 Q1 NUCLEAR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Şeyma Bozkaya , Stephen Taiwo Onifade , Mahmut Sami Duran
{"title":"核能利用与减排收益预期:来自部分利用核能国家经济轨迹的经验证据","authors":"Şeyma Bozkaya ,&nbsp;Stephen Taiwo Onifade ,&nbsp;Mahmut Sami Duran","doi":"10.1016/j.pnucene.2024.105526","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>As the global quest for clean energy grows, the environmentally friendly nature of nuclear energy as a potential non-fossil energy source is generating interest around the world. Therefore, we examine whether nuclear energy utilization has significantly driven carbon emission reduction among the utilizing states. Empirical analyses were conducted using second-generation techniques. The analyses conducted also incorporated testing the EKC theory, as well as examining the effects of natural resources and economic growth on emissions in the sample countries. The empirical analyses cover data from 2000 to 2020 for a total of 27 nuclear energy-using countries as obtained from the Statistical Review of World Energy (Bp, 2021). The findings show that neither the use of nuclear energy nor natural resources significantly reduces carbon emissions across the countries. Additionally, the EKC hypothesis of reduction in emission levels as income expands beyond a certain threshold does not hold for the countries. Moreover, the causality analysis shows that there is a one-way causality from emissions to nuclear energy use. These findings thus highlight the need for more research on how to minimize the indirect carbon footprint that is associated with nuclear energy utilization.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20617,"journal":{"name":"Progress in Nuclear Energy","volume":"178 ","pages":"Article 105526"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Nuclear energy utilization and the expectations of emission-reduction gains: Empirical evidence from economic trajectory of selected utilizing states\",\"authors\":\"Şeyma Bozkaya ,&nbsp;Stephen Taiwo Onifade ,&nbsp;Mahmut Sami Duran\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.pnucene.2024.105526\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>As the global quest for clean energy grows, the environmentally friendly nature of nuclear energy as a potential non-fossil energy source is generating interest around the world. Therefore, we examine whether nuclear energy utilization has significantly driven carbon emission reduction among the utilizing states. Empirical analyses were conducted using second-generation techniques. The analyses conducted also incorporated testing the EKC theory, as well as examining the effects of natural resources and economic growth on emissions in the sample countries. The empirical analyses cover data from 2000 to 2020 for a total of 27 nuclear energy-using countries as obtained from the Statistical Review of World Energy (Bp, 2021). The findings show that neither the use of nuclear energy nor natural resources significantly reduces carbon emissions across the countries. Additionally, the EKC hypothesis of reduction in emission levels as income expands beyond a certain threshold does not hold for the countries. Moreover, the causality analysis shows that there is a one-way causality from emissions to nuclear energy use. These findings thus highlight the need for more research on how to minimize the indirect carbon footprint that is associated with nuclear energy utilization.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20617,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Progress in Nuclear Energy\",\"volume\":\"178 \",\"pages\":\"Article 105526\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Progress in Nuclear Energy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149197024004761\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NUCLEAR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Progress in Nuclear Energy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149197024004761","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NUCLEAR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

随着全球对清洁能源的需求日益增长,核能作为一种潜在的非化石能源,其环境友好的特性正在引起全世界的兴趣。因此,我们研究了核能利用是否显著推动了利用核能国家的碳减排。我们使用第二代技术进行了实证分析。分析中还检验了 EKC 理论,以及自然资源和经济增长对样本国家排放的影响。实证分析涵盖了从《世界能源统计评论》(Bp,2021 年)中获得的 2000 年至 2020 年 27 个核能使用国的数据。研究结果表明,核能和自然资源的使用都不能显著减少各国的碳排放量。此外,EKC 关于收入增长超过一定临界值后排放水平会降低的假设在各国都不成立。此外,因果关系分析表明,排放与核能使用之间存在单向因果关系。因此,这些研究结果突出表明,有必要就如何最大限度地减少与核能利用相关的间接碳足迹开展更多研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Nuclear energy utilization and the expectations of emission-reduction gains: Empirical evidence from economic trajectory of selected utilizing states
As the global quest for clean energy grows, the environmentally friendly nature of nuclear energy as a potential non-fossil energy source is generating interest around the world. Therefore, we examine whether nuclear energy utilization has significantly driven carbon emission reduction among the utilizing states. Empirical analyses were conducted using second-generation techniques. The analyses conducted also incorporated testing the EKC theory, as well as examining the effects of natural resources and economic growth on emissions in the sample countries. The empirical analyses cover data from 2000 to 2020 for a total of 27 nuclear energy-using countries as obtained from the Statistical Review of World Energy (Bp, 2021). The findings show that neither the use of nuclear energy nor natural resources significantly reduces carbon emissions across the countries. Additionally, the EKC hypothesis of reduction in emission levels as income expands beyond a certain threshold does not hold for the countries. Moreover, the causality analysis shows that there is a one-way causality from emissions to nuclear energy use. These findings thus highlight the need for more research on how to minimize the indirect carbon footprint that is associated with nuclear energy utilization.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Progress in Nuclear Energy
Progress in Nuclear Energy 工程技术-核科学技术
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
14.80%
发文量
331
审稿时长
3.5 months
期刊介绍: Progress in Nuclear Energy is an international review journal covering all aspects of nuclear science and engineering. In keeping with the maturity of nuclear power, articles on safety, siting and environmental problems are encouraged, as are those associated with economics and fuel management. However, basic physics and engineering will remain an important aspect of the editorial policy. Articles published are either of a review nature or present new material in more depth. They are aimed at researchers and technically-oriented managers working in the nuclear energy field. Please note the following: 1) PNE seeks high quality research papers which are medium to long in length. Short research papers should be submitted to the journal Annals in Nuclear Energy. 2) PNE reserves the right to reject papers which are based solely on routine application of computer codes used to produce reactor designs or explain existing reactor phenomena. Such papers, although worthy, are best left as laboratory reports whereas Progress in Nuclear Energy seeks papers of originality, which are archival in nature, in the fields of mathematical and experimental nuclear technology, including fission, fusion (blanket physics, radiation damage), safety, materials aspects, economics, etc. 3) Review papers, which may occasionally be invited, are particularly sought by the journal in these fields.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信