并行供应链弹性战略的绩效评估

IF 9.8 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL
Reza Alikhani , Amirhossein Ranjbar , S. Ali Torabi , Christopher W. Zobel
{"title":"并行供应链弹性战略的绩效评估","authors":"Reza Alikhani ,&nbsp;Amirhossein Ranjbar ,&nbsp;S. Ali Torabi ,&nbsp;Christopher W. Zobel","doi":"10.1016/j.ijpe.2024.109446","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Despite the growing research on supply chain resilience (SCR) strategies, a comprehensive performance assessment for implementing multiple strategies simultaneously, considering both positive and negative synergistic effects, is still lacking. Given the complex nature of resilience, it is important for any such assessment to incorporate a multi-dimensional view of resilient behavior. To help address this gap in the literature, we propose an extended slack-based super-efficiency data envelopment analysis for evaluating the performance of SCR strategies when they might be utilized concurrently. The new approach characterizes resilience performance by considering the cost of implementing a set of resilience strategies (resilience cost) as an input to the assessment process, and by considering (1) the resulting cost of the disruption, (2) the impact on the service level, and (3) the associated recovery time as outputs. Taken together, these metrics allow for assessing the combined performance of each candidate set of resilience strategies under their synergistic effects. This new and comprehensive approach for resilience assessment is carefully incorporated into a framework that ranks different subsets of relevant strategies for any given supply chain, according to their relative effectiveness across a variety of different disruption scenarios. The proposed decision framework is able to help decision-makers identify the best ensemble of resilience strategies available. A real-world case study is used to illustrate the significant potential of the framework, and a number of important managerial insights are provided to help decision-makers more effectively analyze and implement their own optimal subsets of SCR strategies, particularly in the presence of network quality or budgetary constraints. Theoretical implications include advancing the understanding of multi-strategy interactions in SCR, while practical implications focus on guiding SC managers in selecting and implementing the most effective resilience strategies under various conditions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":14287,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Production Economics","volume":"279 ","pages":"Article 109446"},"PeriodicalIF":9.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Performance evaluation of concurrent supply chain resilience strategies\",\"authors\":\"Reza Alikhani ,&nbsp;Amirhossein Ranjbar ,&nbsp;S. Ali Torabi ,&nbsp;Christopher W. Zobel\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijpe.2024.109446\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Despite the growing research on supply chain resilience (SCR) strategies, a comprehensive performance assessment for implementing multiple strategies simultaneously, considering both positive and negative synergistic effects, is still lacking. Given the complex nature of resilience, it is important for any such assessment to incorporate a multi-dimensional view of resilient behavior. To help address this gap in the literature, we propose an extended slack-based super-efficiency data envelopment analysis for evaluating the performance of SCR strategies when they might be utilized concurrently. The new approach characterizes resilience performance by considering the cost of implementing a set of resilience strategies (resilience cost) as an input to the assessment process, and by considering (1) the resulting cost of the disruption, (2) the impact on the service level, and (3) the associated recovery time as outputs. Taken together, these metrics allow for assessing the combined performance of each candidate set of resilience strategies under their synergistic effects. This new and comprehensive approach for resilience assessment is carefully incorporated into a framework that ranks different subsets of relevant strategies for any given supply chain, according to their relative effectiveness across a variety of different disruption scenarios. The proposed decision framework is able to help decision-makers identify the best ensemble of resilience strategies available. A real-world case study is used to illustrate the significant potential of the framework, and a number of important managerial insights are provided to help decision-makers more effectively analyze and implement their own optimal subsets of SCR strategies, particularly in the presence of network quality or budgetary constraints. Theoretical implications include advancing the understanding of multi-strategy interactions in SCR, while practical implications focus on guiding SC managers in selecting and implementing the most effective resilience strategies under various conditions.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14287,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Production Economics\",\"volume\":\"279 \",\"pages\":\"Article 109446\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Production Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925527324003037\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Production Economics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925527324003037","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管对供应链复原力(SCR)战略的研究日益增多,但目前仍缺乏同时实施多种战略并考虑正负协同效应的综合绩效评估。鉴于复原力的复杂性,任何此类评估都必须纳入复原力行为的多维视角。为了帮助解决文献中的这一空白,我们提出了一种扩展的基于松弛的超效率数据包络分析法,用于评估 SCR 策略同时使用时的性能。新方法将实施一组弹性策略的成本(弹性成本)作为评估过程的输入,并将 (1) 由此产生的中断成本、(2) 对服务水平的影响以及 (3) 相关的恢复时间作为输出,以此来描述弹性性能。综合考虑这些指标,可以评估每套候选复原力战略在协同效应下的综合表现。这种全新的综合复原力评估方法被精心纳入一个框架,该框架可根据各种不同破坏情景下的相对有效性,对任何给定供应链的不同相关策略子集进行排序。所提出的决策框架能够帮助决策者确定可用的最佳复原力战略组合。本文通过一个真实世界的案例研究来说明该框架的巨大潜力,并提供了一些重要的管理见解,以帮助决策者更有效地分析和实施他们自己的最佳 SCR 战略子集,尤其是在网络质量或预算受限的情况下。该框架的理论意义包括促进对 SCR 中多策略相互作用的理解,而实际意义则侧重于指导 SC 管理人员在各种条件下选择和实施最有效的恢复策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Performance evaluation of concurrent supply chain resilience strategies
Despite the growing research on supply chain resilience (SCR) strategies, a comprehensive performance assessment for implementing multiple strategies simultaneously, considering both positive and negative synergistic effects, is still lacking. Given the complex nature of resilience, it is important for any such assessment to incorporate a multi-dimensional view of resilient behavior. To help address this gap in the literature, we propose an extended slack-based super-efficiency data envelopment analysis for evaluating the performance of SCR strategies when they might be utilized concurrently. The new approach characterizes resilience performance by considering the cost of implementing a set of resilience strategies (resilience cost) as an input to the assessment process, and by considering (1) the resulting cost of the disruption, (2) the impact on the service level, and (3) the associated recovery time as outputs. Taken together, these metrics allow for assessing the combined performance of each candidate set of resilience strategies under their synergistic effects. This new and comprehensive approach for resilience assessment is carefully incorporated into a framework that ranks different subsets of relevant strategies for any given supply chain, according to their relative effectiveness across a variety of different disruption scenarios. The proposed decision framework is able to help decision-makers identify the best ensemble of resilience strategies available. A real-world case study is used to illustrate the significant potential of the framework, and a number of important managerial insights are provided to help decision-makers more effectively analyze and implement their own optimal subsets of SCR strategies, particularly in the presence of network quality or budgetary constraints. Theoretical implications include advancing the understanding of multi-strategy interactions in SCR, while practical implications focus on guiding SC managers in selecting and implementing the most effective resilience strategies under various conditions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Production Economics
International Journal of Production Economics 管理科学-工程:工业
CiteScore
21.40
自引率
7.50%
发文量
266
审稿时长
52 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Production Economics focuses on the interface between engineering and management. It covers all aspects of manufacturing and process industries, as well as production in general. The journal is interdisciplinary, considering activities throughout the product life cycle and material flow cycle. It aims to disseminate knowledge for improving industrial practice and strengthening the theoretical base for decision making. The journal serves as a forum for exchanging ideas and presenting new developments in theory and application, combining academic standards with practical value for industrial applications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信