在髌骨未磨平的初级全膝关节置换术中,比较超一致性聚乙烯内衬和椎体后缘保留聚乙烯内衬不会增加髌骨相关翻修的风险:对 42 105 例膝关节置换术的澳大利亚登记研究》。

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
James Randolph Onggo, Carl Holder, Michael J McAuliffe, Sina Babazadeh
{"title":"在髌骨未磨平的初级全膝关节置换术中,比较超一致性聚乙烯内衬和椎体后缘保留聚乙烯内衬不会增加髌骨相关翻修的风险:对 42 105 例膝关节置换术的澳大利亚登记研究》。","authors":"James Randolph Onggo, Carl Holder, Michael J McAuliffe, Sina Babazadeh","doi":"10.1016/j.arth.2024.11.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Ultra-congruent (UC) polyethylene liners are designed to add additional anterior-posterior stability in primary total knee arthroplasties (TKAs), compensating for actual or potential posterior cruciate ligament incompetence, somewhat like a posterior stabilized knee. The literature supports patella resurfacing in primary posterior-stabilized-compared to cruciate-retaining (CR)-TKA due to higher revision rates with non-resurfaced patella. However, it is unclear if UC liners alter patella-related revisions. The aim of the study was to compare patella revision rates and survivorship of UC versus CR liners in primary TKA without patella resurfacing using two common prostheses in patients who had osteoarthritis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective cohort analysis of data from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry. Patients who underwent primary TKA utilizing one of two common knee systems with cemented tibial fixation for osteoarthritis and did not have their patella resurfaced between January 1, 2007, and December 31, 2022, were included for analysis. A total of 42,105 primary TKA procedures were included (UC n = 18,989, CR n = 23,116). The risk of patella-related revision and survivorship for primary TKA procedures with UC compared to CR liners were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The cumulative revision at 14 years was 5.7% (95% CI [confidence interval] 4.7 to 6.9) and 5.4% (95% CI 4.8 to 6.1) for the CR and UC group, respectively, with no difference between groups (entire period: HR [hazard ratio] = 1.07 (95% CI 0.95 to 1.20), P = 0.256). When revision TKA for patella-related diagnoses was analyzed, there was no difference between the CR and UC groups (entire period: HR = 1.10 (95% CI 0.88 to 1.38), P = 0.406). The prosthesis-specific analyses did not produce any differences between the groups for all-cause or patella-related revisions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The use of UC compared to CR liners in primary TKA without patella resurfacing was not associated with an increased rate of all-cause or patella-related revisions. Surgeons should make clinical decisions on the need for patella resurfacing based on other patient, surgical, and implant factors.</p>","PeriodicalId":51077,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Arthroplasty","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"No Increased Risk of Patella Related Revisions When Comparing Ultra-Congruent Versus Cruciate-Retaining Polyethylene Liners in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasties with an Unresurfaced Patella: An Australian Registry Study of 42,105 Knee Arthroplasties.\",\"authors\":\"James Randolph Onggo, Carl Holder, Michael J McAuliffe, Sina Babazadeh\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.arth.2024.11.005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Ultra-congruent (UC) polyethylene liners are designed to add additional anterior-posterior stability in primary total knee arthroplasties (TKAs), compensating for actual or potential posterior cruciate ligament incompetence, somewhat like a posterior stabilized knee. The literature supports patella resurfacing in primary posterior-stabilized-compared to cruciate-retaining (CR)-TKA due to higher revision rates with non-resurfaced patella. However, it is unclear if UC liners alter patella-related revisions. The aim of the study was to compare patella revision rates and survivorship of UC versus CR liners in primary TKA without patella resurfacing using two common prostheses in patients who had osteoarthritis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective cohort analysis of data from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry. Patients who underwent primary TKA utilizing one of two common knee systems with cemented tibial fixation for osteoarthritis and did not have their patella resurfaced between January 1, 2007, and December 31, 2022, were included for analysis. A total of 42,105 primary TKA procedures were included (UC n = 18,989, CR n = 23,116). The risk of patella-related revision and survivorship for primary TKA procedures with UC compared to CR liners were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The cumulative revision at 14 years was 5.7% (95% CI [confidence interval] 4.7 to 6.9) and 5.4% (95% CI 4.8 to 6.1) for the CR and UC group, respectively, with no difference between groups (entire period: HR [hazard ratio] = 1.07 (95% CI 0.95 to 1.20), P = 0.256). When revision TKA for patella-related diagnoses was analyzed, there was no difference between the CR and UC groups (entire period: HR = 1.10 (95% CI 0.88 to 1.38), P = 0.406). The prosthesis-specific analyses did not produce any differences between the groups for all-cause or patella-related revisions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The use of UC compared to CR liners in primary TKA without patella resurfacing was not associated with an increased rate of all-cause or patella-related revisions. Surgeons should make clinical decisions on the need for patella resurfacing based on other patient, surgical, and implant factors.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51077,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Arthroplasty\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Arthroplasty\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2024.11.005\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Arthroplasty","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2024.11.005","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:超同心(UC)聚乙烯内衬旨在增加初次全膝关节置换术(TKA)的前后稳定性,补偿实际或潜在的后交叉韧带功能不全,有点像后稳定膝关节。与十字韧带固定(CR)膝关节置换术相比,后稳定膝关节置换术的髌骨翻修率更高,因此文献支持在初次后稳定膝关节置换术中进行髌骨翻修。然而,UC内衬是否会改变与髌骨相关的翻修尚不清楚。本研究的目的是在骨关节炎患者使用两种常见假体进行无髌骨表面翻修的初次TKA手术中,比较UC内衬与CR内衬的髌骨翻修率和存活率:这是一项回顾性队列分析,数据来自澳大利亚矫形外科协会国家关节置换登记处。分析对象包括在2007年1月1日至2022年12月31日期间,因骨关节炎接受了两种常用膝关节系统之一的初次TKA,并进行了胫骨骨水泥固定,且未进行髌骨再植的患者。共纳入42105例初次TKA手术(UC=18989例,CR=23116例)。分析了使用 UC 内衬和 CR 内衬进行初级 TKA 手术的髌骨相关翻修风险和存活率:结果:CR组和UC组14年的累计翻修率分别为5.7%(95% CI[置信区间]4.7至6.9)和5.4%(95% CI 4.8至6.1),组间无差异(整个期间:HR[危险比]=1.2):HR[危险比] = 1.07 (95% CI 0.95 to 1.20),P = 0.256)。在分析髌骨相关诊断的翻修 TKA 时,CR 组和 UC 组之间没有差异(整个期间:HR = 1.10(95% CI 0.95 至 1.20),P = 0.256):HR = 1.10 (95% CI 0.88 to 1.38),P = 0.406)。假体特异性分析显示,在全因或髌骨相关翻修方面,两组之间没有任何差异:结论:与CR内衬相比,在无髌骨复位的初次TKA中使用UC内衬与全因或髌骨相关翻修率增加无关。外科医生应根据患者、手术和植入物等其他因素来决定是否需要进行髌骨翻修。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
No Increased Risk of Patella Related Revisions When Comparing Ultra-Congruent Versus Cruciate-Retaining Polyethylene Liners in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasties with an Unresurfaced Patella: An Australian Registry Study of 42,105 Knee Arthroplasties.

Background: Ultra-congruent (UC) polyethylene liners are designed to add additional anterior-posterior stability in primary total knee arthroplasties (TKAs), compensating for actual or potential posterior cruciate ligament incompetence, somewhat like a posterior stabilized knee. The literature supports patella resurfacing in primary posterior-stabilized-compared to cruciate-retaining (CR)-TKA due to higher revision rates with non-resurfaced patella. However, it is unclear if UC liners alter patella-related revisions. The aim of the study was to compare patella revision rates and survivorship of UC versus CR liners in primary TKA without patella resurfacing using two common prostheses in patients who had osteoarthritis.

Methods: This was a retrospective cohort analysis of data from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry. Patients who underwent primary TKA utilizing one of two common knee systems with cemented tibial fixation for osteoarthritis and did not have their patella resurfaced between January 1, 2007, and December 31, 2022, were included for analysis. A total of 42,105 primary TKA procedures were included (UC n = 18,989, CR n = 23,116). The risk of patella-related revision and survivorship for primary TKA procedures with UC compared to CR liners were analyzed.

Results: The cumulative revision at 14 years was 5.7% (95% CI [confidence interval] 4.7 to 6.9) and 5.4% (95% CI 4.8 to 6.1) for the CR and UC group, respectively, with no difference between groups (entire period: HR [hazard ratio] = 1.07 (95% CI 0.95 to 1.20), P = 0.256). When revision TKA for patella-related diagnoses was analyzed, there was no difference between the CR and UC groups (entire period: HR = 1.10 (95% CI 0.88 to 1.38), P = 0.406). The prosthesis-specific analyses did not produce any differences between the groups for all-cause or patella-related revisions.

Conclusion: The use of UC compared to CR liners in primary TKA without patella resurfacing was not associated with an increased rate of all-cause or patella-related revisions. Surgeons should make clinical decisions on the need for patella resurfacing based on other patient, surgical, and implant factors.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Arthroplasty
Journal of Arthroplasty 医学-整形外科
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
20.00%
发文量
734
审稿时长
48 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Arthroplasty brings together the clinical and scientific foundations for joint replacement. This peer-reviewed journal publishes original research and manuscripts of the highest quality from all areas relating to joint replacement or the treatment of its complications, including those dealing with clinical series and experience, prosthetic design, biomechanics, biomaterials, metallurgy, biologic response to arthroplasty materials in vivo and in vitro.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信