制定以证据和共识为基础的数字医疗公平框架。

IF 2.5 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
JAMIA Open Pub Date : 2024-11-15 eCollection Date: 2024-12-01 DOI:10.1093/jamiaopen/ooae136
Elham Hatef, Sarah Hudson Scholle, Bryan Buckley, Jonathan P Weiner, John Matthew Austin
{"title":"制定以证据和共识为基础的数字医疗公平框架。","authors":"Elham Hatef, Sarah Hudson Scholle, Bryan Buckley, Jonathan P Weiner, John Matthew Austin","doi":"10.1093/jamiaopen/ooae136","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To develop an evidence- and consensus-based Digital Healthcare Equity Framework (the Framework) that guides users in intentionally considering equity in healthcare solutions that involve digital technologies.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We conducted an environmental scan including a scoping review of the literature and key informant interviews with health equity and digital healthcare technology thought leaders and convened a technical expert panel (TEP).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We grouped similar concepts from the scoping review and key informant interviews, synthesized them into several primary domains and subdomains, and presented the composite list of domains and subdomains to the TEP for their input. From those, we derived the following domains for the Framework: (1) Patient and Community Characteristics, (2) Health System Characteristics, and (3) Health Information Technology Characteristics. We structured the Framework around the following 5 phases of the digital healthcare lifecycle: planning, development, acquisition, implementation/maintenance, and monitoring/improvement/equity assessment.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The proposed Framework is designed to specify the aspects that need to be considered in a systematic and intentional approach to ensure digital healthcare solutions improve, and not exacerbate, healthcare inequities.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The proposed Framework serves as a tool to help users and other stakeholders assess whether their healthcare solutions that involve digital technologies are equitable at every phase of the digital healthcare lifecycle.</p>","PeriodicalId":36278,"journal":{"name":"JAMIA Open","volume":"7 4","pages":"ooae136"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11565864/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development of an evidence- and consensus-based Digital Healthcare Equity Framework.\",\"authors\":\"Elham Hatef, Sarah Hudson Scholle, Bryan Buckley, Jonathan P Weiner, John Matthew Austin\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jamiaopen/ooae136\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To develop an evidence- and consensus-based Digital Healthcare Equity Framework (the Framework) that guides users in intentionally considering equity in healthcare solutions that involve digital technologies.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We conducted an environmental scan including a scoping review of the literature and key informant interviews with health equity and digital healthcare technology thought leaders and convened a technical expert panel (TEP).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We grouped similar concepts from the scoping review and key informant interviews, synthesized them into several primary domains and subdomains, and presented the composite list of domains and subdomains to the TEP for their input. From those, we derived the following domains for the Framework: (1) Patient and Community Characteristics, (2) Health System Characteristics, and (3) Health Information Technology Characteristics. We structured the Framework around the following 5 phases of the digital healthcare lifecycle: planning, development, acquisition, implementation/maintenance, and monitoring/improvement/equity assessment.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The proposed Framework is designed to specify the aspects that need to be considered in a systematic and intentional approach to ensure digital healthcare solutions improve, and not exacerbate, healthcare inequities.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The proposed Framework serves as a tool to help users and other stakeholders assess whether their healthcare solutions that involve digital technologies are equitable at every phase of the digital healthcare lifecycle.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36278,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JAMIA Open\",\"volume\":\"7 4\",\"pages\":\"ooae136\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11565864/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JAMIA Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jamiaopen/ooae136\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMIA Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jamiaopen/ooae136","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的制定一个以证据和共识为基础的数字医疗保健公平性框架(框架),指导用户有意识地考虑涉及数字技术的医疗保健解决方案的公平性:我们进行了一次环境扫描,包括文献综述和对健康公平与数字医疗技术思想领袖的关键信息访谈,并召集了一个技术专家小组(TEP):结果:我们将范围审查和关键信息访谈中的相似概念进行了分组,将其归纳为几个主要领域和子领域,并将领域和子领域的综合清单提交给技术专家小组征求意见。由此,我们得出了该框架的以下领域:(1) 患者和社区特征,(2) 医疗系统特征,以及 (3) 医疗信息技术特征。我们围绕数字医疗生命周期的以下 5 个阶段构建了该框架:规划、开发、采购、实施/维护以及监控/改进/公平性评估:讨论:拟议的框架旨在明确需要以系统和有意识的方式考虑的方面,以确保数字医疗解决方案能够改善而不是加剧医疗不平等:建议的框架可作为一种工具,帮助用户和其他利益相关者评估其涉及数字技术的医疗解决方案在数字医疗生命周期的每个阶段是否公平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Development of an evidence- and consensus-based Digital Healthcare Equity Framework.

Objective: To develop an evidence- and consensus-based Digital Healthcare Equity Framework (the Framework) that guides users in intentionally considering equity in healthcare solutions that involve digital technologies.

Materials and methods: We conducted an environmental scan including a scoping review of the literature and key informant interviews with health equity and digital healthcare technology thought leaders and convened a technical expert panel (TEP).

Results: We grouped similar concepts from the scoping review and key informant interviews, synthesized them into several primary domains and subdomains, and presented the composite list of domains and subdomains to the TEP for their input. From those, we derived the following domains for the Framework: (1) Patient and Community Characteristics, (2) Health System Characteristics, and (3) Health Information Technology Characteristics. We structured the Framework around the following 5 phases of the digital healthcare lifecycle: planning, development, acquisition, implementation/maintenance, and monitoring/improvement/equity assessment.

Discussion: The proposed Framework is designed to specify the aspects that need to be considered in a systematic and intentional approach to ensure digital healthcare solutions improve, and not exacerbate, healthcare inequities.

Conclusion: The proposed Framework serves as a tool to help users and other stakeholders assess whether their healthcare solutions that involve digital technologies are equitable at every phase of the digital healthcare lifecycle.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
JAMIA Open
JAMIA Open Medicine-Health Informatics
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
4.80%
发文量
102
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信