Brian Hutchinson, Rory Watts, Mary Nyangasi, Benjamin O Anderson, Joyfrida Chepchumba, Elizabeth Wangia, Rose Jalang'o, Valerian Mwenda, Pooja Yerramilli, Toni Lee Kuguru, Kenneth Munge Kabubei, Amparo Gordillo-Tobar, Filip Meheus, Christina Meyer, Andre Ilbawi, Rachel Nugent
{"title":"对肯尼亚乳腺癌干预措施的经济评估。","authors":"Brian Hutchinson, Rory Watts, Mary Nyangasi, Benjamin O Anderson, Joyfrida Chepchumba, Elizabeth Wangia, Rose Jalang'o, Valerian Mwenda, Pooja Yerramilli, Toni Lee Kuguru, Kenneth Munge Kabubei, Amparo Gordillo-Tobar, Filip Meheus, Christina Meyer, Andre Ilbawi, Rachel Nugent","doi":"10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102894","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cancer is the third leading cause of death in Kenya. Breast cancer is responsible for 3100 deaths annually. Quantifying the economic and social impacts of breast cancer supports inclusion of cancer care within Kenya's universal healthcare plan.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Kenya's Ministry of Health led an economic cost-benefit analysis of expanding breast cancer prevention and treatment services. Three scenarios (early diagnosis only, screening with clinical breast exam (CBE-led), and screening with mammography (MG-led)) were modelled using an adapted version of a deterministic state-transition cohort simulation model jointly developed by the World Health Organization (WHO) and the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) and maintained by Forecast Health. Real world evidence on the favorable stage-shift induced by each early detection scenario was used as model inputs. The model estimated the mortality benefits of favorable stage-shifting, and net financial costs and health and economic benefits in 2020 USD.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Respectively, over 40 years, the cost to sustain early diagnosis programs only, CBE-led screening, or mammogram-led screening would require 1.4, 2.8, or 5.2 percent increases above current government health spending. All three strategies are economically efficient in the long run. Net economic benefits of expanded breast cancer care using clinical breast exam screening are $2.3 billion dollars (USD) over the next 40 years with 236,000 women's lives saved in Kenya. Mammographic screening provides net benefits of $1.9 billion (USD) with an additional 34,000 lives saved over 40 years compared to the CBE-led screening approach. Over 40 years, an early diagnosis-only strategy saves the fewest lives and has the lowest net benefit among the three strategies.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>We offer a novel economic evaluation for breast cancer prevention and care expansion within Universal Health Coverage in Kenya. It demonstrates the economic viability of providing those services in a low-middle income (LMI) context.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>The work was funded by the World Bank Group's Tackling Non-Communicable Diseases Challenges in Low- and Middle-Income Countries Trust Fund, supported by the Access Accelerated Partnership. This report was also partially financed by the Global Financing Facility for Women, Children and Adolescents (GFF). The GFF is a global multi-stakeholder partnership hosted at the World Bank that provides catalytic financing and technical support for safe and equitable delivery of essential health and nutrition services for women, children and adolescents, while helping countries to build more resilient health systems.</p>","PeriodicalId":11393,"journal":{"name":"EClinicalMedicine","volume":"77 ","pages":"102894"},"PeriodicalIF":9.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11563939/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An economic evaluation of breast cancer interventions in Kenya.\",\"authors\":\"Brian Hutchinson, Rory Watts, Mary Nyangasi, Benjamin O Anderson, Joyfrida Chepchumba, Elizabeth Wangia, Rose Jalang'o, Valerian Mwenda, Pooja Yerramilli, Toni Lee Kuguru, Kenneth Munge Kabubei, Amparo Gordillo-Tobar, Filip Meheus, Christina Meyer, Andre Ilbawi, Rachel Nugent\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102894\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cancer is the third leading cause of death in Kenya. Breast cancer is responsible for 3100 deaths annually. Quantifying the economic and social impacts of breast cancer supports inclusion of cancer care within Kenya's universal healthcare plan.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Kenya's Ministry of Health led an economic cost-benefit analysis of expanding breast cancer prevention and treatment services. Three scenarios (early diagnosis only, screening with clinical breast exam (CBE-led), and screening with mammography (MG-led)) were modelled using an adapted version of a deterministic state-transition cohort simulation model jointly developed by the World Health Organization (WHO) and the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) and maintained by Forecast Health. Real world evidence on the favorable stage-shift induced by each early detection scenario was used as model inputs. The model estimated the mortality benefits of favorable stage-shifting, and net financial costs and health and economic benefits in 2020 USD.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Respectively, over 40 years, the cost to sustain early diagnosis programs only, CBE-led screening, or mammogram-led screening would require 1.4, 2.8, or 5.2 percent increases above current government health spending. All three strategies are economically efficient in the long run. Net economic benefits of expanded breast cancer care using clinical breast exam screening are $2.3 billion dollars (USD) over the next 40 years with 236,000 women's lives saved in Kenya. Mammographic screening provides net benefits of $1.9 billion (USD) with an additional 34,000 lives saved over 40 years compared to the CBE-led screening approach. Over 40 years, an early diagnosis-only strategy saves the fewest lives and has the lowest net benefit among the three strategies.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>We offer a novel economic evaluation for breast cancer prevention and care expansion within Universal Health Coverage in Kenya. It demonstrates the economic viability of providing those services in a low-middle income (LMI) context.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>The work was funded by the World Bank Group's Tackling Non-Communicable Diseases Challenges in Low- and Middle-Income Countries Trust Fund, supported by the Access Accelerated Partnership. This report was also partially financed by the Global Financing Facility for Women, Children and Adolescents (GFF). The GFF is a global multi-stakeholder partnership hosted at the World Bank that provides catalytic financing and technical support for safe and equitable delivery of essential health and nutrition services for women, children and adolescents, while helping countries to build more resilient health systems.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11393,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"EClinicalMedicine\",\"volume\":\"77 \",\"pages\":\"102894\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11563939/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"EClinicalMedicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102894\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/11/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EClinicalMedicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102894","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:癌症是肯尼亚的第三大死因。每年有 3100 人死于乳腺癌。量化乳腺癌的经济和社会影响有助于将癌症治疗纳入肯尼亚的全民医疗保健计划:肯尼亚卫生部牵头对扩大乳腺癌预防和治疗服务进行了经济成本效益分析。使用世界卫生组织(WHO)和国际癌症研究机构(IARC)联合开发的、由 Forecast Health 维护的确定性状态转换队列模拟模型的改编版,对三种方案(仅早期诊断、临床乳腺检查筛查(CBE 主导)和乳腺 X 射线照相筛查(MG 主导))进行了模拟。每个早期检测方案所引起的有利分期转移的现实证据被用作模型输入。该模型估算了有利的阶段转移所带来的死亡率收益,以及以 2020 年美元为单位的净财务成本、健康和经济收益:在 40 年内,仅维持早期诊断项目、CBE 主导的筛查或乳房 X 线照相主导的筛查所需的成本将分别比目前的政府医疗支出增加 1.4%、2.8% 或 5.2%。从长远来看,这三种策略都具有经济效益。在未来 40 年内,通过临床乳房检查筛查来扩大乳腺癌治疗范围的净经济效益为 23 亿美元(USD),可挽救肯尼亚 23.6 万名妇女的生命。与临床乳房检查为主导的筛查方法相比,乳腺 X 线照相筛查的净效益为 19 亿美元,40 年内可挽救 34,000 人的生命。在 40 年中,仅早期诊断策略挽救的生命最少,净效益也是三种策略中最低的:我们为肯尼亚在全民医保范围内扩大乳腺癌预防和治疗提供了一个新颖的经济评估。它证明了在中低收入国家提供这些服务的经济可行性:这项工作由世界银行集团 "应对中低收入国家非传染性疾病挑战信托基金 "资助,并得到了 "加速获取伙伴关系"(Access Accelerated Partnership)的支持。本报告还得到了全球妇女、儿童和青少年融资机制(GFF)的部分资助。全球妇女、儿童和青少年筹资机制是世界银行主持的一个全球多方利益相关者伙伴关系,为安全、公平地向妇女、儿童和青少年提供基本保健和营养服务提供催化资金和技术支持,同时帮助各国建立更具复原力的保健系统。
An economic evaluation of breast cancer interventions in Kenya.
Background: Cancer is the third leading cause of death in Kenya. Breast cancer is responsible for 3100 deaths annually. Quantifying the economic and social impacts of breast cancer supports inclusion of cancer care within Kenya's universal healthcare plan.
Methods: Kenya's Ministry of Health led an economic cost-benefit analysis of expanding breast cancer prevention and treatment services. Three scenarios (early diagnosis only, screening with clinical breast exam (CBE-led), and screening with mammography (MG-led)) were modelled using an adapted version of a deterministic state-transition cohort simulation model jointly developed by the World Health Organization (WHO) and the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) and maintained by Forecast Health. Real world evidence on the favorable stage-shift induced by each early detection scenario was used as model inputs. The model estimated the mortality benefits of favorable stage-shifting, and net financial costs and health and economic benefits in 2020 USD.
Findings: Respectively, over 40 years, the cost to sustain early diagnosis programs only, CBE-led screening, or mammogram-led screening would require 1.4, 2.8, or 5.2 percent increases above current government health spending. All three strategies are economically efficient in the long run. Net economic benefits of expanded breast cancer care using clinical breast exam screening are $2.3 billion dollars (USD) over the next 40 years with 236,000 women's lives saved in Kenya. Mammographic screening provides net benefits of $1.9 billion (USD) with an additional 34,000 lives saved over 40 years compared to the CBE-led screening approach. Over 40 years, an early diagnosis-only strategy saves the fewest lives and has the lowest net benefit among the three strategies.
Interpretation: We offer a novel economic evaluation for breast cancer prevention and care expansion within Universal Health Coverage in Kenya. It demonstrates the economic viability of providing those services in a low-middle income (LMI) context.
Funding: The work was funded by the World Bank Group's Tackling Non-Communicable Diseases Challenges in Low- and Middle-Income Countries Trust Fund, supported by the Access Accelerated Partnership. This report was also partially financed by the Global Financing Facility for Women, Children and Adolescents (GFF). The GFF is a global multi-stakeholder partnership hosted at the World Bank that provides catalytic financing and technical support for safe and equitable delivery of essential health and nutrition services for women, children and adolescents, while helping countries to build more resilient health systems.
期刊介绍:
eClinicalMedicine is a gold open-access clinical journal designed to support frontline health professionals in addressing the complex and rapid health transitions affecting societies globally. The journal aims to assist practitioners in overcoming healthcare challenges across diverse communities, spanning diagnosis, treatment, prevention, and health promotion. Integrating disciplines from various specialties and life stages, it seeks to enhance health systems as fundamental institutions within societies. With a forward-thinking approach, eClinicalMedicine aims to redefine the future of healthcare.