高频搜索收听趋势的数字流行病学,用于监测 COVID-19 大流行期间的主观幸福感。

IF 2.6 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Frontiers in Psychology Pub Date : 2024-11-01 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1442303
Khalida Al-Kenane, Frederic Boy, Ahmad Alsaber, Rania Nafea, Shihanah AlMutairi
{"title":"高频搜索收听趋势的数字流行病学,用于监测 COVID-19 大流行期间的主观幸福感。","authors":"Khalida Al-Kenane, Frederic Boy, Ahmad Alsaber, Rania Nafea, Shihanah AlMutairi","doi":"10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1442303","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic has led to a dramatic increase in online searches related to psychological distress. Governments worldwide have responded with various measures to mitigate the impact of the virus, influencing public behavior and emotional well-being. This study investigated the relationship between government actions and public reactions in terms of online search behaviors, particularly concerning psychological distress during the pandemic. The primary objective of this study was to analyze how changes in government policies during the COVID-19 pandemic influenced public expressions of psychological distress, as reflected in the volume of related online searches in Kuwait.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Utilizing Google Trends data, the study analyzed search frequencies for terms associated with psychological distress such as \"anxiety\" and \"lockdown.\" The analysis correlated these search trends with government actions using the Oxford COVID-19 Government Response Tracker (OxCGRT). The study period covered March 1, 2020, to October 10, 2020, and involved extensive data collection and analysis using custom software in R programming.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was a significant correlation between the stringency of government-imposed restrictions and the volume of online searches related to psychological distress. Increased searches for \"lockdown\" coincided with heightened government restrictions and were associated with increased searches for \"anxiety,\" suggesting that policy measures significantly impacted public psychological distress.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study concludes that governmental responses to the COVID-19 pandemic, measured through OxCGRT, have a measurable impact on public psychological distress, as evidenced by online search behaviors. This underscores the importance of considering psychological impacts in policymaking and suggests further research to explore this dynamic comprehensively. Future studies should focus on refining the correlation between specific types of policy measures and different expressions of psychological distress to better inform public health strategies and interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":12525,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Psychology","volume":"15 ","pages":"1442303"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11566744/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Digital epidemiology of high-frequency search listening trends for the surveillance of subjective well-being during COVID-19 pandemic.\",\"authors\":\"Khalida Al-Kenane, Frederic Boy, Ahmad Alsaber, Rania Nafea, Shihanah AlMutairi\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1442303\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic has led to a dramatic increase in online searches related to psychological distress. Governments worldwide have responded with various measures to mitigate the impact of the virus, influencing public behavior and emotional well-being. This study investigated the relationship between government actions and public reactions in terms of online search behaviors, particularly concerning psychological distress during the pandemic. The primary objective of this study was to analyze how changes in government policies during the COVID-19 pandemic influenced public expressions of psychological distress, as reflected in the volume of related online searches in Kuwait.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Utilizing Google Trends data, the study analyzed search frequencies for terms associated with psychological distress such as \\\"anxiety\\\" and \\\"lockdown.\\\" The analysis correlated these search trends with government actions using the Oxford COVID-19 Government Response Tracker (OxCGRT). The study period covered March 1, 2020, to October 10, 2020, and involved extensive data collection and analysis using custom software in R programming.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was a significant correlation between the stringency of government-imposed restrictions and the volume of online searches related to psychological distress. Increased searches for \\\"lockdown\\\" coincided with heightened government restrictions and were associated with increased searches for \\\"anxiety,\\\" suggesting that policy measures significantly impacted public psychological distress.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study concludes that governmental responses to the COVID-19 pandemic, measured through OxCGRT, have a measurable impact on public psychological distress, as evidenced by online search behaviors. This underscores the importance of considering psychological impacts in policymaking and suggests further research to explore this dynamic comprehensively. Future studies should focus on refining the correlation between specific types of policy measures and different expressions of psychological distress to better inform public health strategies and interventions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12525,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Psychology\",\"volume\":\"15 \",\"pages\":\"1442303\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11566744/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1442303\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1442303","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行导致与心理困扰有关的在线搜索急剧增加。世界各国政府采取了各种措施来减轻病毒的影响,从而影响了公众的行为和情绪。本研究调查了政府行为与公众在网上搜索行为方面的反应之间的关系,尤其是在大流行病期间与心理困扰有关的搜索行为。本研究的主要目的是分析在 COVID-19 大流行期间,政府政策的变化如何影响公众对心理压力的表达,这反映在科威特的相关在线搜索量上:本研究利用谷歌趋势数据,分析了 "焦虑 "和 "封锁 "等与心理困扰相关的术语的搜索频率。分析使用牛津 COVID-19 政府响应跟踪器 (OxCGRT) 将这些搜索趋势与政府行动联系起来。研究时间涵盖 2020 年 3 月 1 日至 2020 年 10 月 10 日,使用 R 编程的定制软件进行了大量的数据收集和分析:结果:政府施加限制的严格程度与心理压力相关的在线搜索量之间存在明显的相关性。封锁 "搜索量的增加与政府限制措施的加强相吻合,并与 "焦虑 "搜索量的增加相关联,这表明政策措施对公众的心理困扰产生了重大影响:本研究的结论是,通过 OxCGRT 衡量的政府应对 COVID-19 大流行的措施对公众的心理压力产生了可衡量的影响,这一点可以通过在线搜索行为得到证明。这强调了在制定政策时考虑心理影响的重要性,并建议开展进一步研究,以全面探索这一动态变化。未来的研究应侧重于完善特定类型的政策措施与不同的心理困扰表现形式之间的相关性,以便更好地为公共卫生战略和干预措施提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Digital epidemiology of high-frequency search listening trends for the surveillance of subjective well-being during COVID-19 pandemic.

Background: The coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic has led to a dramatic increase in online searches related to psychological distress. Governments worldwide have responded with various measures to mitigate the impact of the virus, influencing public behavior and emotional well-being. This study investigated the relationship between government actions and public reactions in terms of online search behaviors, particularly concerning psychological distress during the pandemic. The primary objective of this study was to analyze how changes in government policies during the COVID-19 pandemic influenced public expressions of psychological distress, as reflected in the volume of related online searches in Kuwait.

Method: Utilizing Google Trends data, the study analyzed search frequencies for terms associated with psychological distress such as "anxiety" and "lockdown." The analysis correlated these search trends with government actions using the Oxford COVID-19 Government Response Tracker (OxCGRT). The study period covered March 1, 2020, to October 10, 2020, and involved extensive data collection and analysis using custom software in R programming.

Results: There was a significant correlation between the stringency of government-imposed restrictions and the volume of online searches related to psychological distress. Increased searches for "lockdown" coincided with heightened government restrictions and were associated with increased searches for "anxiety," suggesting that policy measures significantly impacted public psychological distress.

Conclusion: The study concludes that governmental responses to the COVID-19 pandemic, measured through OxCGRT, have a measurable impact on public psychological distress, as evidenced by online search behaviors. This underscores the importance of considering psychological impacts in policymaking and suggests further research to explore this dynamic comprehensively. Future studies should focus on refining the correlation between specific types of policy measures and different expressions of psychological distress to better inform public health strategies and interventions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Frontiers in Psychology
Frontiers in Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
13.20%
发文量
7396
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Psychology is the largest journal in its field, publishing rigorously peer-reviewed research across the psychological sciences, from clinical research to cognitive science, from perception to consciousness, from imaging studies to human factors, and from animal cognition to social psychology. Field Chief Editor Axel Cleeremans at the Free University of Brussels is supported by an outstanding Editorial Board of international researchers. This multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians and the public worldwide. The journal publishes the best research across the entire field of psychology. Today, psychological science is becoming increasingly important at all levels of society, from the treatment of clinical disorders to our basic understanding of how the mind works. It is highly interdisciplinary, borrowing questions from philosophy, methods from neuroscience and insights from clinical practice - all in the goal of furthering our grasp of human nature and society, as well as our ability to develop new intervention methods.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信