网络流行语与版权:灵活看待共同作者身份,促进记忆性混音话语?

IF 0.7 Q2 LAW
Brian Leung
{"title":"网络流行语与版权:灵活看待共同作者身份,促进记忆性混音话语?","authors":"Brian Leung","doi":"10.1111/jwip.12311","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Interactions between internet meme culture and copyright law are inherently complex: online communities often do not seek express permission from rightsholders of underlying work to recreate internet memes. However, internet meme culture can be tremendously valuable from sociocultural and economic standpoints. As such, there are apparent benefits if copyright law could integrate the memetic remix discourse within its evaluations in a systematic manner. To this end, this article entertains the merits of interpreting the joint authorship test flexibly, as one of the many possible ways to integrate the memetic remix discourse in UK copyright law. Such a systematic and integrated approach may better reflect internet meme culture. It allows copyright to prevent selective enforcement because rightsholders of underlying works will not enjoy sole control over the use of their work once they become viral internet memes. It also paves way for copyright law to systematically facilitate underlying works to evolve into viral internet memes without a constant dread of retrospective takedowns and infringement claims.</p>","PeriodicalId":54129,"journal":{"name":"Journal of World Intellectual Property","volume":"27 3","pages":"463-487"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jwip.12311","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Internet memes and copyright: Facilitating the memetic remix discourse by viewing joint authorship flexibly?\",\"authors\":\"Brian Leung\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jwip.12311\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Interactions between internet meme culture and copyright law are inherently complex: online communities often do not seek express permission from rightsholders of underlying work to recreate internet memes. However, internet meme culture can be tremendously valuable from sociocultural and economic standpoints. As such, there are apparent benefits if copyright law could integrate the memetic remix discourse within its evaluations in a systematic manner. To this end, this article entertains the merits of interpreting the joint authorship test flexibly, as one of the many possible ways to integrate the memetic remix discourse in UK copyright law. Such a systematic and integrated approach may better reflect internet meme culture. It allows copyright to prevent selective enforcement because rightsholders of underlying works will not enjoy sole control over the use of their work once they become viral internet memes. It also paves way for copyright law to systematically facilitate underlying works to evolve into viral internet memes without a constant dread of retrospective takedowns and infringement claims.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54129,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of World Intellectual Property\",\"volume\":\"27 3\",\"pages\":\"463-487\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jwip.12311\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of World Intellectual Property\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jwip.12311\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of World Intellectual Property","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jwip.12311","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

网络流行语文化与版权法之间的互动本身就很复杂:网络社区在再创作网络流行语时,通常不会征得基础作品权利人的明确许可。然而,从社会文化和经济角度来看,网络流行语文化具有巨大价值。因此,如果版权法能够系统地将 "记忆性混音 "的论述纳入其评估范围,将会带来明显的益处。为此,本文探讨了灵活解释共同作者检验的优点,以此作为将记忆性混音话语纳入英国版权法的多种可能方法之一。这种系统性的综合方法可以更好地反映互联网meme文化。它允许版权防止选择性执法,因为基础作品一旦成为病毒式网络meme,其权利人将无法单独控制其作品的使用。它还为版权法铺平了道路,使其能够系统地促进基础作品演变为病毒式网络流行语,而不必时刻担心追溯性删除和侵权索赔。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Internet memes and copyright: Facilitating the memetic remix discourse by viewing joint authorship flexibly?

Interactions between internet meme culture and copyright law are inherently complex: online communities often do not seek express permission from rightsholders of underlying work to recreate internet memes. However, internet meme culture can be tremendously valuable from sociocultural and economic standpoints. As such, there are apparent benefits if copyright law could integrate the memetic remix discourse within its evaluations in a systematic manner. To this end, this article entertains the merits of interpreting the joint authorship test flexibly, as one of the many possible ways to integrate the memetic remix discourse in UK copyright law. Such a systematic and integrated approach may better reflect internet meme culture. It allows copyright to prevent selective enforcement because rightsholders of underlying works will not enjoy sole control over the use of their work once they become viral internet memes. It also paves way for copyright law to systematically facilitate underlying works to evolve into viral internet memes without a constant dread of retrospective takedowns and infringement claims.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
43
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信