共同生产在行动:通过 "实践社区 "探索野生动物保护从研究到实施的空间

IF 2.8 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION
Sami Livingston, Ashley A. Dayer, Allyssa Zebrowski, Abby Sterling, Nolan Schillerstrom, Thomas Archibald, Willandia Chaves
{"title":"共同生产在行动:通过 \"实践社区 \"探索野生动物保护从研究到实施的空间","authors":"Sami Livingston,&nbsp;Ashley A. Dayer,&nbsp;Allyssa Zebrowski,&nbsp;Abby Sterling,&nbsp;Nolan Schillerstrom,&nbsp;Thomas Archibald,&nbsp;Willandia Chaves","doi":"10.1111/csp2.13251","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Effective conservation practices require addressing the divide between research and implementation. Co-production, which emphasizes collaboration and diverse knowledge exchange, is increasingly recognized as valuable in conservation to address this challenge, yet empirical insights remain limited. This case study explores using a Community of Practice (CoP) as an avenue for facilitating co-production in shorebird conservation. Centering researchers and practitioners within implementation initiatives, we evaluate factors enabling a successful CoP and barriers hindering members' experiences. Capacity emerged as the predominant barrier, while the leading factors contributing to CoP success were having a dedicated space to support labor division, relationship building, and informal learning among CoP members. Leveraging our evaluation insights, we offer practical recommendations for structuring a CoP to optimize these benefits and advance the integration of CoPs and co-production principles in conservation practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":51337,"journal":{"name":"Conservation Science and Practice","volume":"6 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/csp2.13251","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Co-production in action: Navigating the research-to-implementation space in wildlife conservation through a Community of Practice\",\"authors\":\"Sami Livingston,&nbsp;Ashley A. Dayer,&nbsp;Allyssa Zebrowski,&nbsp;Abby Sterling,&nbsp;Nolan Schillerstrom,&nbsp;Thomas Archibald,&nbsp;Willandia Chaves\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/csp2.13251\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Effective conservation practices require addressing the divide between research and implementation. Co-production, which emphasizes collaboration and diverse knowledge exchange, is increasingly recognized as valuable in conservation to address this challenge, yet empirical insights remain limited. This case study explores using a Community of Practice (CoP) as an avenue for facilitating co-production in shorebird conservation. Centering researchers and practitioners within implementation initiatives, we evaluate factors enabling a successful CoP and barriers hindering members' experiences. Capacity emerged as the predominant barrier, while the leading factors contributing to CoP success were having a dedicated space to support labor division, relationship building, and informal learning among CoP members. Leveraging our evaluation insights, we offer practical recommendations for structuring a CoP to optimize these benefits and advance the integration of CoPs and co-production principles in conservation practice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51337,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Conservation Science and Practice\",\"volume\":\"6 11\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/csp2.13251\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Conservation Science and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/csp2.13251\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Conservation Science and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/csp2.13251","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

有效的保护实践需要解决研究与实施之间的鸿沟。共同生产强调合作和多样化的知识交流,越来越多的人认识到共同生产在保护中的价值,以应对这一挑战,但经验见解仍然有限。本案例研究探讨了将实践社区(CoP)作为促进岸鸟保护中共同生产的途径。我们以实施计划中的研究人员和实践者为中心,评估了促进 CoP 取得成功的因素以及阻碍成员体验的障碍。能力是最主要的障碍,而有助于 CoP 取得成功的主要因素是拥有一个支持分工的专用空间、建立关系以及 CoP 成员之间的非正式学习。利用我们的评估见解,我们为构建 CoP 提供了实用建议,以优化这些益处,并推动在保护实践中整合 CoP 和共同生产原则。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Co-production in action: Navigating the research-to-implementation space in wildlife conservation through a Community of Practice

Co-production in action: Navigating the research-to-implementation space in wildlife conservation through a Community of Practice

Effective conservation practices require addressing the divide between research and implementation. Co-production, which emphasizes collaboration and diverse knowledge exchange, is increasingly recognized as valuable in conservation to address this challenge, yet empirical insights remain limited. This case study explores using a Community of Practice (CoP) as an avenue for facilitating co-production in shorebird conservation. Centering researchers and practitioners within implementation initiatives, we evaluate factors enabling a successful CoP and barriers hindering members' experiences. Capacity emerged as the predominant barrier, while the leading factors contributing to CoP success were having a dedicated space to support labor division, relationship building, and informal learning among CoP members. Leveraging our evaluation insights, we offer practical recommendations for structuring a CoP to optimize these benefits and advance the integration of CoPs and co-production principles in conservation practice.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Conservation Science and Practice
Conservation Science and Practice BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION-
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
6.50%
发文量
240
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信