降低白质高密度进展理论临床试验磁共振成像筛查成本的两阶段招募设计。

IF 5 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Journal of the American Heart Association Pub Date : 2024-11-19 Epub Date: 2024-11-15 DOI:10.1161/JAHA.124.036140
Marco Egle, Mohini Johri, Melinda C Power, Jennifer A Deal, Clifford R Jack, Kevin J Sullivan, Thomas H Mosley, Rebecca F Gottesman
{"title":"降低白质高密度进展理论临床试验磁共振成像筛查成本的两阶段招募设计。","authors":"Marco Egle, Mohini Johri, Melinda C Power, Jennifer A Deal, Clifford R Jack, Kevin J Sullivan, Thomas H Mosley, Rebecca F Gottesman","doi":"10.1161/JAHA.124.036140","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>White matter hyperintensities (WMH) and their progression are associated with risk of dementia and stroke, so are an important target for clinical trials. The cost of broad magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) screening to identify eligible individuals, however, limits the feasibility of designing clinical trials targeting WMH. A low-cost retinal or clinical screening measure before MRI could reduce recruitment costs versus an MRI-only screening design in a hypothetical clinical trial.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>Data from the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities study with valid retinal and WMH measurements (<i>N</i>=1311) were used. To identify a population at greater likelihood of significant WMH on MRI and thus reduce the number of screening MRIs required, we evaluated 3 theoretical prescreening measures: (1) retinal, (2) clinical, (3) combined clinical-retinal. Given a target sample for clinical trials (<i>N</i>=646), we calculated screening sample sizes based on the proportion within the population having an elevated score for each prescreening measure (separately) multiplied by the proportion of significant WMH among those with that prescreening feature. Recruitment costs were calculated using estimated retinal and MRI cost estimates. Compared with the estimated cost of MRI-only screening (>$4.24 million, requiring MRI on 6526 participants), prescreening for a high clinical score resulted in total cost of $2.47 million, with an initial screening group of 52 778 participants, with MRI in 3801. A high clinical-retinal score cutoff resulted in costs of $2.9 million while requiring 13 572 participants, with 3801 completing MRI.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A 2-stage design with low-cost prescreening measures is a promising approach, resulting in reduced theoretical recruitment costs compared with an MRI-only design.</p>","PeriodicalId":54370,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Heart Association","volume":" ","pages":"e036140"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Two-Stage Recruitment Design to Reduce Magnetic Resonance Imaging Screening Cost for a Theoretical Clinical Trial of White Matter Hyperintensity Progression.\",\"authors\":\"Marco Egle, Mohini Johri, Melinda C Power, Jennifer A Deal, Clifford R Jack, Kevin J Sullivan, Thomas H Mosley, Rebecca F Gottesman\",\"doi\":\"10.1161/JAHA.124.036140\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>White matter hyperintensities (WMH) and their progression are associated with risk of dementia and stroke, so are an important target for clinical trials. The cost of broad magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) screening to identify eligible individuals, however, limits the feasibility of designing clinical trials targeting WMH. A low-cost retinal or clinical screening measure before MRI could reduce recruitment costs versus an MRI-only screening design in a hypothetical clinical trial.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>Data from the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities study with valid retinal and WMH measurements (<i>N</i>=1311) were used. To identify a population at greater likelihood of significant WMH on MRI and thus reduce the number of screening MRIs required, we evaluated 3 theoretical prescreening measures: (1) retinal, (2) clinical, (3) combined clinical-retinal. Given a target sample for clinical trials (<i>N</i>=646), we calculated screening sample sizes based on the proportion within the population having an elevated score for each prescreening measure (separately) multiplied by the proportion of significant WMH among those with that prescreening feature. Recruitment costs were calculated using estimated retinal and MRI cost estimates. Compared with the estimated cost of MRI-only screening (>$4.24 million, requiring MRI on 6526 participants), prescreening for a high clinical score resulted in total cost of $2.47 million, with an initial screening group of 52 778 participants, with MRI in 3801. A high clinical-retinal score cutoff resulted in costs of $2.9 million while requiring 13 572 participants, with 3801 completing MRI.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A 2-stage design with low-cost prescreening measures is a promising approach, resulting in reduced theoretical recruitment costs compared with an MRI-only design.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54370,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the American Heart Association\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e036140\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the American Heart Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.124.036140\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/11/15 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Heart Association","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.124.036140","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:白质增厚(WMH)及其进展与痴呆和中风的风险有关,因此是临床试验的重要目标。然而,通过广泛的磁共振成像(MRI)筛查来确定符合条件的个体所需的费用限制了设计针对 WMH 的临床试验的可行性。在磁共振成像前进行低成本的视网膜或临床筛查措施,可以在假设的临床试验中降低招募成本,而只进行磁共振成像筛查的设计则无法降低招募成本:研究使用了 "社区动脉粥样硬化风险"(Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities)研究中有效的视网膜和WMH测量数据(N=1311)。为了确定在磁共振成像中更有可能出现明显 WMH 的人群,从而减少所需的磁共振成像筛查次数,我们评估了 3 种理论预筛措施:(1) 视网膜,(2) 临床,(3) 临床-视网膜联合。鉴于临床试验的目标样本(N=646),我们根据人群中每项预筛指标(分别)得分升高的比例乘以具有该预筛特征的人群中显著 WMH 的比例,计算出筛查样本量。招募成本使用视网膜和 MRI 成本估算值进行计算。与只进行核磁共振成像筛查的估计成本(大于 424 万美元,需要对 6526 名参与者进行核磁共振成像)相比,临床评分高的预筛查总成本为 247 万美元,初始筛查组有 52 778 名参与者,其中 3801 人需要进行核磁共振成像。临床视网膜高分截止值的成本为 290 万美元,需要 13 572 名参与者,其中 3801 人完成核磁共振成像:结论:采用低成本预筛选措施的两阶段设计是一种很有前景的方法,与仅采用核磁共振成像的设计相比,可降低理论招募成本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Two-Stage Recruitment Design to Reduce Magnetic Resonance Imaging Screening Cost for a Theoretical Clinical Trial of White Matter Hyperintensity Progression.

Background: White matter hyperintensities (WMH) and their progression are associated with risk of dementia and stroke, so are an important target for clinical trials. The cost of broad magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) screening to identify eligible individuals, however, limits the feasibility of designing clinical trials targeting WMH. A low-cost retinal or clinical screening measure before MRI could reduce recruitment costs versus an MRI-only screening design in a hypothetical clinical trial.

Methods and results: Data from the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities study with valid retinal and WMH measurements (N=1311) were used. To identify a population at greater likelihood of significant WMH on MRI and thus reduce the number of screening MRIs required, we evaluated 3 theoretical prescreening measures: (1) retinal, (2) clinical, (3) combined clinical-retinal. Given a target sample for clinical trials (N=646), we calculated screening sample sizes based on the proportion within the population having an elevated score for each prescreening measure (separately) multiplied by the proportion of significant WMH among those with that prescreening feature. Recruitment costs were calculated using estimated retinal and MRI cost estimates. Compared with the estimated cost of MRI-only screening (>$4.24 million, requiring MRI on 6526 participants), prescreening for a high clinical score resulted in total cost of $2.47 million, with an initial screening group of 52 778 participants, with MRI in 3801. A high clinical-retinal score cutoff resulted in costs of $2.9 million while requiring 13 572 participants, with 3801 completing MRI.

Conclusions: A 2-stage design with low-cost prescreening measures is a promising approach, resulting in reduced theoretical recruitment costs compared with an MRI-only design.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of the American Heart Association
Journal of the American Heart Association CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
1.90%
发文量
1749
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: As an Open Access journal, JAHA - Journal of the American Heart Association is rapidly and freely available, accelerating the translation of strong science into effective practice. JAHA is an authoritative, peer-reviewed Open Access journal focusing on cardiovascular and cerebrovascular disease. JAHA provides a global forum for basic and clinical research and timely reviews on cardiovascular disease and stroke. As an Open Access journal, its content is free on publication to read, download, and share, accelerating the translation of strong science into effective practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信