影响紧急医疗调度员在中风呼叫中决策的因素--一项定性研究。

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Bjørn Jamtli, Edel Jannecke Svendsen, Trine Møgster Jørgensen, Jo Kramer-Johansen, Maren Ranhoff Hov, Camilla Hardeland
{"title":"影响紧急医疗调度员在中风呼叫中决策的因素--一项定性研究。","authors":"Bjørn Jamtli, Edel Jannecke Svendsen, Trine Møgster Jørgensen, Jo Kramer-Johansen, Maren Ranhoff Hov, Camilla Hardeland","doi":"10.1186/s12873-024-01129-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Emergency Medical Communication Centers (EMCC) have a key role in the prehospital chain-of-stroke-survival by recognizing stroke patients and reducing prehospital delay. However, studies on EMCC stroke recognition report both substantial undertriage and overtriage. Since mis-triage at the EMCC challenges the whole chain-of-stroke-survival, by occupying limited resources for non-stroke patients or failing to recognize the true stroke patients, there is a need to achieve a more comprehensive understanding of the dispatchers' routines and experiences. The aim of this study was to explore factors affecting EMCC dispatcher's decision-making in stroke calls.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A qualitative exploratory study, based on individual semi-structured interviews of 15 medical dispatchers from EMCC Oslo, Norway. Interviews were conducted during August and October 2022 and analyzed using the principles of thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified four themes: [1] Pronounced stroke symptoms are easy to identify [2]. Non-specific neurological symptoms raise suspicion of acute stroke but are difficult to differentiate from other medical conditions [3]. Consistent use of the Criteria Based Dispatch (CBD) protocol may increase EMCC overtriage [4]. Contextual conditions at EMCC can affect dispatchers' decision-making process and the ability for experiential learning.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Medical dispatchers at the EMCC perceive vague and non-specific stroke symptoms, such as dizziness, confusion or altered behaviour, challenging to differentiate from symptoms of other less time-critical medical conditions. They also perceive the current CBD protocol in use as less supportive in assessing such symptoms. High workload and strict EMCC response time interval requirements hinder the gathering of essential patient information and the ability to seek guidance in cases of doubt, potentially exacerbating both EMCC undertriage and overtriage. The absence of feedback loops and other strategies for experiential learning in the EMCC hampers the medical dispatcher's ability to evaluate their own assessments and improve dispatch accuracy.</p>","PeriodicalId":9002,"journal":{"name":"BMC Emergency Medicine","volume":"24 1","pages":"214"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11566283/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Factors affecting emergency medical dispatchers decision making in stroke calls - a qualitative study.\",\"authors\":\"Bjørn Jamtli, Edel Jannecke Svendsen, Trine Møgster Jørgensen, Jo Kramer-Johansen, Maren Ranhoff Hov, Camilla Hardeland\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12873-024-01129-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Emergency Medical Communication Centers (EMCC) have a key role in the prehospital chain-of-stroke-survival by recognizing stroke patients and reducing prehospital delay. However, studies on EMCC stroke recognition report both substantial undertriage and overtriage. Since mis-triage at the EMCC challenges the whole chain-of-stroke-survival, by occupying limited resources for non-stroke patients or failing to recognize the true stroke patients, there is a need to achieve a more comprehensive understanding of the dispatchers' routines and experiences. The aim of this study was to explore factors affecting EMCC dispatcher's decision-making in stroke calls.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A qualitative exploratory study, based on individual semi-structured interviews of 15 medical dispatchers from EMCC Oslo, Norway. Interviews were conducted during August and October 2022 and analyzed using the principles of thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified four themes: [1] Pronounced stroke symptoms are easy to identify [2]. Non-specific neurological symptoms raise suspicion of acute stroke but are difficult to differentiate from other medical conditions [3]. Consistent use of the Criteria Based Dispatch (CBD) protocol may increase EMCC overtriage [4]. Contextual conditions at EMCC can affect dispatchers' decision-making process and the ability for experiential learning.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Medical dispatchers at the EMCC perceive vague and non-specific stroke symptoms, such as dizziness, confusion or altered behaviour, challenging to differentiate from symptoms of other less time-critical medical conditions. They also perceive the current CBD protocol in use as less supportive in assessing such symptoms. High workload and strict EMCC response time interval requirements hinder the gathering of essential patient information and the ability to seek guidance in cases of doubt, potentially exacerbating both EMCC undertriage and overtriage. The absence of feedback loops and other strategies for experiential learning in the EMCC hampers the medical dispatcher's ability to evaluate their own assessments and improve dispatch accuracy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9002,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Emergency Medicine\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"214\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11566283/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Emergency Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12873-024-01129-0\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EMERGENCY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12873-024-01129-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:紧急医疗通信中心(EMCC)通过识别卒中患者和减少院前延误,在院前卒中救治链中发挥着关键作用。然而,有关急救医疗通信中心卒中识别的研究报告显示,存在大量误诊和过度误诊的情况。由于急救中心的误诊会占用有限的资源用于非卒中患者或无法识别真正的卒中患者,从而对整个卒中救治链造成挑战,因此有必要更全面地了解调度员的日常工作和经验。本研究旨在探讨影响急救中心调度员在中风呼叫中决策的因素:这是一项定性探索性研究,基于对挪威奥斯陆急救中心 15 名医疗调度员进行的个人半结构式访谈。访谈于 2022 年 8 月至 10 月间进行,采用主题分析法进行分析:我们确定了四个主题:[1] 明显的卒中症状易于识别[2]。非特异性神经症状会引起对急性卒中的怀疑,但很难与其他疾病区分开来[3]。持续使用基于标准的调度(CBD)协议可能会增加急救中心的过度诊断[4]。急救中心的环境条件会影响调度员的决策过程和经验学习能力:结论:急救中心的医疗调度员认为,头晕、意识模糊或行为改变等模糊且非特异性的卒中症状很难与其他时间紧迫性较低的疾病症状区分开来。他们还认为目前使用的 CBD 协议对评估此类症状的支持作用较小。高负荷的工作量和对急救中心响应时间间隔的严格要求,阻碍了对病人基本信息的收集和在有疑问时寻求指导的能力,有可能加剧急救中心的漏诊和误诊。急救中心缺乏反馈回路和其他经验学习策略,阻碍了医疗调度员评估自身评估和提高调度准确性的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Factors affecting emergency medical dispatchers decision making in stroke calls - a qualitative study.

Objectives: Emergency Medical Communication Centers (EMCC) have a key role in the prehospital chain-of-stroke-survival by recognizing stroke patients and reducing prehospital delay. However, studies on EMCC stroke recognition report both substantial undertriage and overtriage. Since mis-triage at the EMCC challenges the whole chain-of-stroke-survival, by occupying limited resources for non-stroke patients or failing to recognize the true stroke patients, there is a need to achieve a more comprehensive understanding of the dispatchers' routines and experiences. The aim of this study was to explore factors affecting EMCC dispatcher's decision-making in stroke calls.

Materials and methods: A qualitative exploratory study, based on individual semi-structured interviews of 15 medical dispatchers from EMCC Oslo, Norway. Interviews were conducted during August and October 2022 and analyzed using the principles of thematic analysis.

Results: We identified four themes: [1] Pronounced stroke symptoms are easy to identify [2]. Non-specific neurological symptoms raise suspicion of acute stroke but are difficult to differentiate from other medical conditions [3]. Consistent use of the Criteria Based Dispatch (CBD) protocol may increase EMCC overtriage [4]. Contextual conditions at EMCC can affect dispatchers' decision-making process and the ability for experiential learning.

Conclusions: Medical dispatchers at the EMCC perceive vague and non-specific stroke symptoms, such as dizziness, confusion or altered behaviour, challenging to differentiate from symptoms of other less time-critical medical conditions. They also perceive the current CBD protocol in use as less supportive in assessing such symptoms. High workload and strict EMCC response time interval requirements hinder the gathering of essential patient information and the ability to seek guidance in cases of doubt, potentially exacerbating both EMCC undertriage and overtriage. The absence of feedback loops and other strategies for experiential learning in the EMCC hampers the medical dispatcher's ability to evaluate their own assessments and improve dispatch accuracy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Emergency Medicine
BMC Emergency Medicine Medicine-Emergency Medicine
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
8.00%
发文量
178
审稿时长
29 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Emergency Medicine is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all urgent and emergency aspects of medicine, in both practice and basic research. In addition, the journal covers aspects of disaster medicine and medicine in special locations, such as conflict areas and military medicine, together with articles concerning healthcare services in the emergency departments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信