中风前远端中血管闭塞的直接抽吸与联合技术:JET 远端血管闭塞研究》。

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Vitanio Palmisano, Luigi Simonetti, Nicola Marotti, Lorenzo Reverberi, Alessio Comai, Maria Porzia Ganimede, Simone Comelli, Francesco Taglialatela, Andrea Zini, Matteo Paolucci, Massimo Sponza, Chiara Ciardi, Luca Verganti, Stefano Vallone, Tommaso Gorgatti, Enrica Franchini, Antonio Marrazzo, Andrea Paladini, Giuseppina Della Malva, Michele Barone, Alessandra Briatico Vangosa, Carmine Di Stasi, Nicola Burdi, Vittorio Semeraro
{"title":"中风前远端中血管闭塞的直接抽吸与联合技术:JET 远端血管闭塞研究》。","authors":"Vitanio Palmisano, Luigi Simonetti, Nicola Marotti, Lorenzo Reverberi, Alessio Comai, Maria Porzia Ganimede, Simone Comelli, Francesco Taglialatela, Andrea Zini, Matteo Paolucci, Massimo Sponza, Chiara Ciardi, Luca Verganti, Stefano Vallone, Tommaso Gorgatti, Enrica Franchini, Antonio Marrazzo, Andrea Paladini, Giuseppina Della Malva, Michele Barone, Alessandra Briatico Vangosa, Carmine Di Stasi, Nicola Burdi, Vittorio Semeraro","doi":"10.1227/ons.0000000000001411","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>The optimal mechanical thrombectomy technique for distal, medium vessel occlusion (DMVO) stroke remains unknown. We aimed to compare the safety and efficacy of 2 thrombectomy first-line approaches, direct aspiration (DA), and combined technique (CT) in patients with DMVOs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective review of a prospectively collected multicenter database of patients with DMVOs (at or distal to M2 and A1), who underwent mechanical thrombectomy with JET D reperfusion catheters between January 2020 and December 2021. The primary end point was the rate of first-pass complete recanalization, defined as modified treatment in cerebral infarction (mTICI) 3. The hemorrhagic complications, the 90 days functional independence rate (modified Rankin Scale 0-2), and mortality were also evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 171 consecutive patients were enrolled (95 in DA and 76 in CT cohort). The 2 groups had comparable demographics and baseline characteristics. The DA group had a higher rate of first-pass effect (40.0% vs 10.5%, P < .001), final mTICI 2b-3 (89.5% vs 71.1%, P = .003) and final mTICI 3 (58.9% vs 28.9%, P < .001), shorter groin to reperfusion time (65 ± 43 min vs 101 ± 60 min, P < .001), and higher rate of 90-day functional independence (63.7% vs 36.1%; P = .001) compared with the CT group. There were no significant differences in hemorrhagic complications between the 2 groups. The DA group showed a lower rate of 90-day mortality (9.9% vs 27.8%; P = .004).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In patients with DMVOs, DA with a distal dedicated reperfusion catheter appears to demonstrate better safety and efficacy when compared with the CT using the same catheter.</p>","PeriodicalId":54254,"journal":{"name":"Operative Neurosurgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Direct Aspiration Versus Combined Technique for Anterior Distal, Medium Vessel Occlusions Stroke: The JET Distal Vessel Occlusion Study.\",\"authors\":\"Vitanio Palmisano, Luigi Simonetti, Nicola Marotti, Lorenzo Reverberi, Alessio Comai, Maria Porzia Ganimede, Simone Comelli, Francesco Taglialatela, Andrea Zini, Matteo Paolucci, Massimo Sponza, Chiara Ciardi, Luca Verganti, Stefano Vallone, Tommaso Gorgatti, Enrica Franchini, Antonio Marrazzo, Andrea Paladini, Giuseppina Della Malva, Michele Barone, Alessandra Briatico Vangosa, Carmine Di Stasi, Nicola Burdi, Vittorio Semeraro\",\"doi\":\"10.1227/ons.0000000000001411\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>The optimal mechanical thrombectomy technique for distal, medium vessel occlusion (DMVO) stroke remains unknown. We aimed to compare the safety and efficacy of 2 thrombectomy first-line approaches, direct aspiration (DA), and combined technique (CT) in patients with DMVOs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective review of a prospectively collected multicenter database of patients with DMVOs (at or distal to M2 and A1), who underwent mechanical thrombectomy with JET D reperfusion catheters between January 2020 and December 2021. The primary end point was the rate of first-pass complete recanalization, defined as modified treatment in cerebral infarction (mTICI) 3. The hemorrhagic complications, the 90 days functional independence rate (modified Rankin Scale 0-2), and mortality were also evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 171 consecutive patients were enrolled (95 in DA and 76 in CT cohort). The 2 groups had comparable demographics and baseline characteristics. The DA group had a higher rate of first-pass effect (40.0% vs 10.5%, P < .001), final mTICI 2b-3 (89.5% vs 71.1%, P = .003) and final mTICI 3 (58.9% vs 28.9%, P < .001), shorter groin to reperfusion time (65 ± 43 min vs 101 ± 60 min, P < .001), and higher rate of 90-day functional independence (63.7% vs 36.1%; P = .001) compared with the CT group. There were no significant differences in hemorrhagic complications between the 2 groups. The DA group showed a lower rate of 90-day mortality (9.9% vs 27.8%; P = .004).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In patients with DMVOs, DA with a distal dedicated reperfusion catheter appears to demonstrate better safety and efficacy when compared with the CT using the same catheter.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54254,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Operative Neurosurgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Operative Neurosurgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1227/ons.0000000000001411\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Operative Neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1227/ons.0000000000001411","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:治疗远端中血管闭塞(DMVO)卒中的最佳机械性血栓切除技术仍然未知。我们旨在比较两种血栓切除一线方法--直接抽吸(DA)和联合技术(CT)--在 DMVO 患者中的安全性和有效性:我们对前瞻性收集的多中心数据库进行了回顾性审查,该数据库收录了 2020 年 1 月至 2021 年 12 月期间使用 JET D 再灌注导管进行机械血栓切除术的 DMVOs(M2 和 A1 处或远端)患者。主要终点是首次完全再通率(定义为改良脑梗死治疗(mTICI)3),还评估了出血并发症、90 天功能独立率(改良兰金量表 0-2)和死亡率:共有 171 名患者连续接受了治疗(其中 95 人接受了 DA 治疗,76 人接受了 CT 治疗)。两组患者的人口统计学和基线特征相当。与CT组相比,DA组的首通有效率更高(40.0% vs 10.5%,P < .001),最终mTICI 2b-3(89.5% vs 71.1%,P = .003)和最终mTICI 3(58.9% vs 28.9%,P < .001),腹股沟到再灌注时间更短(65 ± 43 min vs 101 ± 60 min,P < .001),90天功能独立率更高(63.7% vs 36.1%;P = .001)。两组在出血并发症方面无明显差异。DA组的90天死亡率较低(9.9% vs 27.8%;P = .004):结论:在DMVO患者中,使用远端专用再灌注导管的DA与使用相同导管的CT相比,似乎具有更好的安全性和有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Direct Aspiration Versus Combined Technique for Anterior Distal, Medium Vessel Occlusions Stroke: The JET Distal Vessel Occlusion Study.

Background and objectives: The optimal mechanical thrombectomy technique for distal, medium vessel occlusion (DMVO) stroke remains unknown. We aimed to compare the safety and efficacy of 2 thrombectomy first-line approaches, direct aspiration (DA), and combined technique (CT) in patients with DMVOs.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of a prospectively collected multicenter database of patients with DMVOs (at or distal to M2 and A1), who underwent mechanical thrombectomy with JET D reperfusion catheters between January 2020 and December 2021. The primary end point was the rate of first-pass complete recanalization, defined as modified treatment in cerebral infarction (mTICI) 3. The hemorrhagic complications, the 90 days functional independence rate (modified Rankin Scale 0-2), and mortality were also evaluated.

Results: A total of 171 consecutive patients were enrolled (95 in DA and 76 in CT cohort). The 2 groups had comparable demographics and baseline characteristics. The DA group had a higher rate of first-pass effect (40.0% vs 10.5%, P < .001), final mTICI 2b-3 (89.5% vs 71.1%, P = .003) and final mTICI 3 (58.9% vs 28.9%, P < .001), shorter groin to reperfusion time (65 ± 43 min vs 101 ± 60 min, P < .001), and higher rate of 90-day functional independence (63.7% vs 36.1%; P = .001) compared with the CT group. There were no significant differences in hemorrhagic complications between the 2 groups. The DA group showed a lower rate of 90-day mortality (9.9% vs 27.8%; P = .004).

Conclusion: In patients with DMVOs, DA with a distal dedicated reperfusion catheter appears to demonstrate better safety and efficacy when compared with the CT using the same catheter.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Operative Neurosurgery
Operative Neurosurgery Medicine-Neurology (clinical)
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
13.00%
发文量
530
期刊介绍: Operative Neurosurgery is a bi-monthly, unique publication focusing exclusively on surgical technique and devices, providing practical, skill-enhancing guidance to its readers. Complementing the clinical and research studies published in Neurosurgery, Operative Neurosurgery brings the reader technical material that highlights operative procedures, anatomy, instrumentation, devices, and technology. Operative Neurosurgery is the practical resource for cutting-edge material that brings the surgeon the most up to date literature on operative practice and technique
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信