比较 GoCheck Kids 和 Spot Screener 照片筛查设备使用 2021 AAPOS 建议检测弱视风险因素的效果。

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Journal of Aapos Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-09 DOI:10.1016/j.jaapos.2024.104035
Serina S Applebaum, Anuoluwapo Sopeyin, Alaa Mohamedali, Erin Walsh, Jill Rotruck, Valentine Y Njike, Martha A Howard
{"title":"比较 GoCheck Kids 和 Spot Screener 照片筛查设备使用 2021 AAPOS 建议检测弱视风险因素的效果。","authors":"Serina S Applebaum, Anuoluwapo Sopeyin, Alaa Mohamedali, Erin Walsh, Jill Rotruck, Valentine Y Njike, Martha A Howard","doi":"10.1016/j.jaapos.2024.104035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare the Spot Vision Screener (SPOT) to the GoCheck Kids mobile application (GCK) in the evaluation of amblyopia risk factors (ARFs), according to updated 2021 AAPOS guidelines for instrument-based pediatric vision screening.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>SPOT, GCK using horizontal and vertical images (two-photo mode), and a complete eye examination (CEE) were performed on children ages ≥1 to <7 years referred to a pediatric ophthalmologist from October 2020 to December 2022 for a failed vision screen based on manufacturer guidelines. The primary outcomes were sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value (PPV) for each photoscreener.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 267 subjects included, 42% had one or more 2021 guideline ARFs after CEE. Overall, for SPOT and GCK, respectively, the sensitivity was 0.765 and 0.748, specificity was 0.769 and 0.755, and PPV was 0.728 and 0.712 (P > 0.05 for all). In participants ≥4 years old, SPOT had higher ARF sensitivity than GCK (0.900 and 0.750, resp.; P = 0.005), while among participants <4 years old, SPOT had lower sensitivity than GCK (0.487 and 0.744 respectively; P = 0.004). There were no statistically significant differences between SPOT and GCK in specificity among the younger (0.750 and 0.676 resp.) or older (0.785 and 0.823, resp.) cohorts, or in strabismus detection. The performance of the SPOT and GCK was evaluated using receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves. Area under the curve (AUC) ranged from 0.857 to 0.980 for SPOT and 0.809 to 0.931 for GCK.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Overall, SPOT, and GCK had similar values for sensitivity, specificity, and PPV to identify patients with ARFs using the 2021 AAPOS guidelines.</p>","PeriodicalId":50261,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Aapos","volume":" ","pages":"104035"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of the GoCheck Kids and Spot Screener photoscreening devices for the detection of amblyopia risk factors using 2021 AAPOS recommendations.\",\"authors\":\"Serina S Applebaum, Anuoluwapo Sopeyin, Alaa Mohamedali, Erin Walsh, Jill Rotruck, Valentine Y Njike, Martha A Howard\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jaapos.2024.104035\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare the Spot Vision Screener (SPOT) to the GoCheck Kids mobile application (GCK) in the evaluation of amblyopia risk factors (ARFs), according to updated 2021 AAPOS guidelines for instrument-based pediatric vision screening.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>SPOT, GCK using horizontal and vertical images (two-photo mode), and a complete eye examination (CEE) were performed on children ages ≥1 to <7 years referred to a pediatric ophthalmologist from October 2020 to December 2022 for a failed vision screen based on manufacturer guidelines. The primary outcomes were sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value (PPV) for each photoscreener.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 267 subjects included, 42% had one or more 2021 guideline ARFs after CEE. Overall, for SPOT and GCK, respectively, the sensitivity was 0.765 and 0.748, specificity was 0.769 and 0.755, and PPV was 0.728 and 0.712 (P > 0.05 for all). In participants ≥4 years old, SPOT had higher ARF sensitivity than GCK (0.900 and 0.750, resp.; P = 0.005), while among participants <4 years old, SPOT had lower sensitivity than GCK (0.487 and 0.744 respectively; P = 0.004). There were no statistically significant differences between SPOT and GCK in specificity among the younger (0.750 and 0.676 resp.) or older (0.785 and 0.823, resp.) cohorts, or in strabismus detection. The performance of the SPOT and GCK was evaluated using receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves. Area under the curve (AUC) ranged from 0.857 to 0.980 for SPOT and 0.809 to 0.931 for GCK.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Overall, SPOT, and GCK had similar values for sensitivity, specificity, and PPV to identify patients with ARFs using the 2021 AAPOS guidelines.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50261,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Aapos\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"104035\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Aapos\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaapos.2024.104035\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/11/9 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Aapos","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaapos.2024.104035","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:根据美国儿童视力筛查协会(AAPOS)2021年更新的基于仪器的儿童视力筛查指南,比较Spot视力筛查仪(SPOT)和GoCheck Kids移动应用程序(GCK)在弱视风险因素(ARF)评估中的作用:方法:对年龄≥1 至 6 岁的儿童进行 SPOT、使用水平和垂直图像(双照片模式)的 GCK 以及全面眼科检查(CEE):在纳入的 267 名受试者中,42% 的受试者在接受 CEE 检查后出现了一个或多个 2021 年指南中规定的 ARF。总体而言,SPOT 和 GCK 的灵敏度分别为 0.765 和 0.748,特异性分别为 0.769 和 0.755,PPV 分别为 0.728 和 0.712(P 均 > 0.05)。在年龄≥4 岁的参与者中,SPOT 对 ARF 的敏感性高于 GCK(分别为 0.900 和 0.750;P = 0.005),而在年龄≥5 岁的参与者中,SPOT 对 ARF 的敏感性低于 GCK(分别为 0.001 和 0.002;P = 0.005):总体而言,SPOT 和 GCK 在使用 2021 AAPOS 指南识别 ARF 患者方面具有相似的灵敏度、特异性和 PPV 值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of the GoCheck Kids and Spot Screener photoscreening devices for the detection of amblyopia risk factors using 2021 AAPOS recommendations.

Purpose: To compare the Spot Vision Screener (SPOT) to the GoCheck Kids mobile application (GCK) in the evaluation of amblyopia risk factors (ARFs), according to updated 2021 AAPOS guidelines for instrument-based pediatric vision screening.

Methods: SPOT, GCK using horizontal and vertical images (two-photo mode), and a complete eye examination (CEE) were performed on children ages ≥1 to <7 years referred to a pediatric ophthalmologist from October 2020 to December 2022 for a failed vision screen based on manufacturer guidelines. The primary outcomes were sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value (PPV) for each photoscreener.

Results: Of 267 subjects included, 42% had one or more 2021 guideline ARFs after CEE. Overall, for SPOT and GCK, respectively, the sensitivity was 0.765 and 0.748, specificity was 0.769 and 0.755, and PPV was 0.728 and 0.712 (P > 0.05 for all). In participants ≥4 years old, SPOT had higher ARF sensitivity than GCK (0.900 and 0.750, resp.; P = 0.005), while among participants <4 years old, SPOT had lower sensitivity than GCK (0.487 and 0.744 respectively; P = 0.004). There were no statistically significant differences between SPOT and GCK in specificity among the younger (0.750 and 0.676 resp.) or older (0.785 and 0.823, resp.) cohorts, or in strabismus detection. The performance of the SPOT and GCK was evaluated using receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves. Area under the curve (AUC) ranged from 0.857 to 0.980 for SPOT and 0.809 to 0.931 for GCK.

Conclusions: Overall, SPOT, and GCK had similar values for sensitivity, specificity, and PPV to identify patients with ARFs using the 2021 AAPOS guidelines.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Aapos
Journal of Aapos 医学-小儿科
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
12.50%
发文量
159
审稿时长
55 days
期刊介绍: Journal of AAPOS presents expert information on children''s eye diseases and on strabismus as it affects all age groups. Major articles by leading experts in the field cover clinical and investigative studies, treatments, case reports, surgical techniques, descriptions of instrumentation, current concept reviews, and new diagnostic techniques. The Journal is the official publication of the American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信