临床研究中口腔黏膜打孔活检和其他口腔生物样本采集的安全性。

IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Aanish Puri, Beverly Wuertz, Nelson L Rhodus, Frank G Ondrey
{"title":"临床研究中口腔黏膜打孔活检和其他口腔生物样本采集的安全性。","authors":"Aanish Puri, Beverly Wuertz, Nelson L Rhodus, Frank G Ondrey","doi":"10.1016/j.oooo.2024.10.084","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Oral punch biopsies are frequently used for analysis of lesions since they are minimally invasive, easily performed, and assist in diagnosis. Despite broad usage, recent changes in risk classification characterize oral punch biopsies as \"greater than minimal risk\" for institutional review board purposes. We performed a retrospective review of oral sampling in clinical trials to determine the safety of punch biopsies and other biospecimen collection methods in our oral cancer surveillance program.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Punch biopsies of 3- and 4-mm were collected following topical and local injection anesthetic. Hemostasis was achieved using pressure and silver nitrate cautery. Other specimens were collected according to standard collection guidelines. Safety and adverse events were determined through consultation with clinical investigator guidelines and were graded with the NCI Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v5.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 579 samples were collected, 339 of which were oral punch biopsies. There were no adverse events above NCI CTCAE grade 1 for any biospecimen collection.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These results support the safety profile of oral punch biopsies and saliva collection. Additionally, these results align with previous research on punch biopsy safety and demonstrate fewer bleeding events. Based on the results and prior research, we believe that punch biopsies should be considered a minimal-risk procedure.</p>","PeriodicalId":49010,"journal":{"name":"Oral Surgery Oral Medicine Oral Pathology Oral Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Safety of oral mucosal punch biopsy and other oral biospecimen collections in clinical research.\",\"authors\":\"Aanish Puri, Beverly Wuertz, Nelson L Rhodus, Frank G Ondrey\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.oooo.2024.10.084\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Oral punch biopsies are frequently used for analysis of lesions since they are minimally invasive, easily performed, and assist in diagnosis. Despite broad usage, recent changes in risk classification characterize oral punch biopsies as \\\"greater than minimal risk\\\" for institutional review board purposes. We performed a retrospective review of oral sampling in clinical trials to determine the safety of punch biopsies and other biospecimen collection methods in our oral cancer surveillance program.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Punch biopsies of 3- and 4-mm were collected following topical and local injection anesthetic. Hemostasis was achieved using pressure and silver nitrate cautery. Other specimens were collected according to standard collection guidelines. Safety and adverse events were determined through consultation with clinical investigator guidelines and were graded with the NCI Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v5.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 579 samples were collected, 339 of which were oral punch biopsies. There were no adverse events above NCI CTCAE grade 1 for any biospecimen collection.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These results support the safety profile of oral punch biopsies and saliva collection. Additionally, these results align with previous research on punch biopsy safety and demonstrate fewer bleeding events. Based on the results and prior research, we believe that punch biopsies should be considered a minimal-risk procedure.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49010,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Oral Surgery Oral Medicine Oral Pathology Oral Radiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Oral Surgery Oral Medicine Oral Pathology Oral Radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oooo.2024.10.084\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oral Surgery Oral Medicine Oral Pathology Oral Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oooo.2024.10.084","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:口腔打孔活检常用于病变分析,因为它创伤小、操作简便并有助于诊断。尽管使用广泛,但最近风险分类的变化将口腔打孔活检定性为 "大于最小风险",以满足机构审查委员会的目的。我们对临床试验中的口腔取样进行了回顾性审查,以确定在口腔癌监测项目中打孔活检和其他生物样本采集方法的安全性:研究设计:在局部注射麻醉剂后,采集 3 毫米和 4 毫米的打孔活检样本。使用压力和硝酸银烧灼法止血。其他标本按照标准采集指南采集。安全性和不良事件的判定参照临床研究者指南,并根据 NCI 不良事件通用术语标准 (CTCAE) v5.Results 进行分级:共采集了 579 份样本,其中 339 份为口腔打孔活检样本。任何生物样本采集均未出现超过 NCI CTCAE 1 级的不良事件:这些结果支持口腔打孔活检和唾液采集的安全性。此外,这些结果与之前关于打孔活检安全性的研究结果一致,表明出血事件较少。根据这些结果和之前的研究,我们认为打孔活检应被视为风险极低的手术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Safety of oral mucosal punch biopsy and other oral biospecimen collections in clinical research.

Objective: Oral punch biopsies are frequently used for analysis of lesions since they are minimally invasive, easily performed, and assist in diagnosis. Despite broad usage, recent changes in risk classification characterize oral punch biopsies as "greater than minimal risk" for institutional review board purposes. We performed a retrospective review of oral sampling in clinical trials to determine the safety of punch biopsies and other biospecimen collection methods in our oral cancer surveillance program.

Study design: Punch biopsies of 3- and 4-mm were collected following topical and local injection anesthetic. Hemostasis was achieved using pressure and silver nitrate cautery. Other specimens were collected according to standard collection guidelines. Safety and adverse events were determined through consultation with clinical investigator guidelines and were graded with the NCI Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v5.

Results: In total, 579 samples were collected, 339 of which were oral punch biopsies. There were no adverse events above NCI CTCAE grade 1 for any biospecimen collection.

Conclusions: These results support the safety profile of oral punch biopsies and saliva collection. Additionally, these results align with previous research on punch biopsy safety and demonstrate fewer bleeding events. Based on the results and prior research, we believe that punch biopsies should be considered a minimal-risk procedure.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Oral Surgery Oral Medicine Oral Pathology Oral Radiology
Oral Surgery Oral Medicine Oral Pathology Oral Radiology DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
6.90%
发文量
1217
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology and Oral Radiology is required reading for anyone in the fields of oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology or advanced general practice dentistry. It is the only major dental journal that provides a practical and complete overview of the medical and surgical techniques of dental practice in four areas. Topics covered include such current issues as dental implants, treatment of HIV-infected patients, and evaluation and treatment of TMJ disorders. The official publication for nine societies, the Journal is recommended for initial purchase in the Brandon Hill study, Selected List of Books and Journals for the Small Medical Library.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信