对面向公众的非创伤性腕部疾病网站进行范围界定,并进行质量评估。

IF 0.9 Q4 REHABILITATION
Thomas Mitchell, Michael Bircumshaw, Clare Cryan, Dawid Kotwica, Nick Hamilton, Ben Dean, Sionnadh McLean
{"title":"对面向公众的非创伤性腕部疾病网站进行范围界定,并进行质量评估。","authors":"Thomas Mitchell, Michael Bircumshaw, Clare Cryan, Dawid Kotwica, Nick Hamilton, Ben Dean, Sionnadh McLean","doi":"10.1177/17589983241287082","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Public-facing resources for non-traumatic wrist disorders (NTWD) exist, but care recipients and healthcare professionals alike are uncertain where to access the most useful resources and have raised concerns over the quality of information provided. Previous studies involving stakeholders highlight a need for quality evaluation of these resources. The aim of this study was to identify website resources accessible to UK-based online health seekers and explore their content through quality assessment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A scoping review of public-facing websites was conducted in accordance with Joanna Briggs Institute guidelines and PRISMA-ScR checklist. An <i>a-priori</i> search strategy was performed of publicly accessible websites using lay terms were entered into a simple Google search. The DISCERN tool was used to appraise the quality of health information with additional data charted to pre-determined criteria.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The 82 websites meeting inclusion criteria scored an average of 2/5 DISCERN. Nine funding categories existed with private service websites were the most common. 18 different diagnoses were found with twenty different management interventions were recommended.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Considerable variation was found in the quality of websites providing information which people with NTWD are likely to access. Quality and trustworthiness of website information on NTWD are not the preserve of any sector or organisation and we identified potential for improvements across the board.</p>","PeriodicalId":43971,"journal":{"name":"Hand Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"17589983241287082"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11559518/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A scoping review to map public-facing websites for non-traumatic wrist disorders with quality evaluation.\",\"authors\":\"Thomas Mitchell, Michael Bircumshaw, Clare Cryan, Dawid Kotwica, Nick Hamilton, Ben Dean, Sionnadh McLean\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/17589983241287082\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Public-facing resources for non-traumatic wrist disorders (NTWD) exist, but care recipients and healthcare professionals alike are uncertain where to access the most useful resources and have raised concerns over the quality of information provided. Previous studies involving stakeholders highlight a need for quality evaluation of these resources. The aim of this study was to identify website resources accessible to UK-based online health seekers and explore their content through quality assessment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A scoping review of public-facing websites was conducted in accordance with Joanna Briggs Institute guidelines and PRISMA-ScR checklist. An <i>a-priori</i> search strategy was performed of publicly accessible websites using lay terms were entered into a simple Google search. The DISCERN tool was used to appraise the quality of health information with additional data charted to pre-determined criteria.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The 82 websites meeting inclusion criteria scored an average of 2/5 DISCERN. Nine funding categories existed with private service websites were the most common. 18 different diagnoses were found with twenty different management interventions were recommended.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Considerable variation was found in the quality of websites providing information which people with NTWD are likely to access. Quality and trustworthiness of website information on NTWD are not the preserve of any sector or organisation and we identified potential for improvements across the board.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":43971,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hand Therapy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"17589983241287082\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11559518/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hand Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/17589983241287082\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hand Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17589983241287082","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:针对非创伤性腕部疾病(NTWD)的公共资源已经存在,但接受治疗者和医疗保健专业人员都不确定从哪里获取最有用的资源,并对所提供信息的质量表示担忧。以往涉及利益相关者的研究强调了对这些资源进行质量评估的必要性。本研究的目的是确定英国在线健康寻求者可访问的网站资源,并通过质量评估探讨其内容:方法:根据乔安娜-布里格斯研究所(Joanna Briggs Institute)指南和 PRISMA-ScR 核对表,对面向公众的网站进行了范围界定审查。在简单的谷歌搜索中输入非专业词汇,对可公开访问的网站进行先验搜索策略。使用 DISCERN 工具评估健康信息的质量,并根据预先确定的标准绘制附加数据图表:符合纳入标准的 82 个网站的 DISCERN 平均得分为 2/5。共存在九个资助类别,其中私营服务网站最为常见。发现了 18 种不同的诊断,并推荐了 20 种不同的管理干预措施:结论:在提供 NTWD 患者可能会访问的信息的网站质量方面存在很大差异。非淋菌性尿道炎网站信息的质量和可信度并不是任何部门或组织的专利,我们发现了全面改进的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A scoping review to map public-facing websites for non-traumatic wrist disorders with quality evaluation.

Introduction: Public-facing resources for non-traumatic wrist disorders (NTWD) exist, but care recipients and healthcare professionals alike are uncertain where to access the most useful resources and have raised concerns over the quality of information provided. Previous studies involving stakeholders highlight a need for quality evaluation of these resources. The aim of this study was to identify website resources accessible to UK-based online health seekers and explore their content through quality assessment.

Methods: A scoping review of public-facing websites was conducted in accordance with Joanna Briggs Institute guidelines and PRISMA-ScR checklist. An a-priori search strategy was performed of publicly accessible websites using lay terms were entered into a simple Google search. The DISCERN tool was used to appraise the quality of health information with additional data charted to pre-determined criteria.

Results: The 82 websites meeting inclusion criteria scored an average of 2/5 DISCERN. Nine funding categories existed with private service websites were the most common. 18 different diagnoses were found with twenty different management interventions were recommended.

Conclusion: Considerable variation was found in the quality of websites providing information which people with NTWD are likely to access. Quality and trustworthiness of website information on NTWD are not the preserve of any sector or organisation and we identified potential for improvements across the board.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Hand Therapy
Hand Therapy REHABILITATION-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
10.00%
发文量
13
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信