用于覆盖义齿的氧化锆和铸金根冠的拉伸粘接强度、配合精度和失效类型。

IF 1.1 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
E Muehlemann, I Lanvancy, A Krasniqi, V Colombo, F J Strauss, N Dydyk, E Armağan, M Özcan
{"title":"用于覆盖义齿的氧化锆和铸金根冠的拉伸粘接强度、配合精度和失效类型。","authors":"E Muehlemann, I Lanvancy, A Krasniqi, V Colombo, F J Strauss, N Dydyk, E Armağan, M Özcan","doi":"10.1922/EJPRD_2685Muehlemann08","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To compare the tensile strength, dislodgement forces, marginal gap and failure types between digitally fabricated zirconia root copings and conventionally manufactured cast gold root copings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Extracted human teeth (N=30) were prepared for the root copings and randomly divided into 2 groups: (1)zirconia root copings(ZC) and gold root copings(GC). The specimens were tested for tensile bond strength and dislodgement forces in a universal testing machine and the types of the coping failures modes were analyzed. In addition, the marginal gap was measured. Data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA and Pearson correlation test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean tensile bond strength in the total horizontal adhesive area for ZC group was 7.5±2.8MPa and for GC group 10.5±4.8 MPa(p⟩0.05). The mean dislodgement forces for the ZC and GC groups were 242±107N and 311±118N, respectively and with no significant differences between the groups (p=0.12). The mean vertical marginal gap in the ZC group amounted to 27±11.05μm, while in the GC group it was 35.33±10.49μm, showing no statistically significant difference between the two groups (p=0.058). Mixed failure modes were more common (93%) in both groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In terms of all tested parameters, the zirconia root copings were comparable to the gold copings.</p>","PeriodicalId":45686,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry","volume":" ","pages":"384-391"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Tensile Bond Strength, Fit Accuracy and Failure Types of Zirconia and Cast Gold Root Copings for Overdentures.\",\"authors\":\"E Muehlemann, I Lanvancy, A Krasniqi, V Colombo, F J Strauss, N Dydyk, E Armağan, M Özcan\",\"doi\":\"10.1922/EJPRD_2685Muehlemann08\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To compare the tensile strength, dislodgement forces, marginal gap and failure types between digitally fabricated zirconia root copings and conventionally manufactured cast gold root copings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Extracted human teeth (N=30) were prepared for the root copings and randomly divided into 2 groups: (1)zirconia root copings(ZC) and gold root copings(GC). The specimens were tested for tensile bond strength and dislodgement forces in a universal testing machine and the types of the coping failures modes were analyzed. In addition, the marginal gap was measured. Data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA and Pearson correlation test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean tensile bond strength in the total horizontal adhesive area for ZC group was 7.5±2.8MPa and for GC group 10.5±4.8 MPa(p⟩0.05). The mean dislodgement forces for the ZC and GC groups were 242±107N and 311±118N, respectively and with no significant differences between the groups (p=0.12). The mean vertical marginal gap in the ZC group amounted to 27±11.05μm, while in the GC group it was 35.33±10.49μm, showing no statistically significant difference between the two groups (p=0.058). Mixed failure modes were more common (93%) in both groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In terms of all tested parameters, the zirconia root copings were comparable to the gold copings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45686,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"384-391\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1922/EJPRD_2685Muehlemann08\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1922/EJPRD_2685Muehlemann08","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:比较数字制作的氧化锆根锁和传统制造的铸金根锁的拉伸强度、脱落力、边缘间隙和失效类型:拔出的人类牙齿(N=30)制备牙冠,随机分为两组:(1) 氧化锆牙冠(ZC)和金牙冠(GC)。在万能试验机上对试样进行拉伸粘接强度和脱落力测试,并分析了牙冠失效模式的类型。此外,还测量了边缘间隙。数据分析采用单因素方差分析和皮尔逊相关检验:ZC组水平粘接区的平均拉伸粘接强度为7.5±2.8MPa,GC组为10.5±4.8MPa(p⟩0.05)。ZC 组和 GC 组的平均脱位力分别为 242±107N 和 311±118N,组间差异不显著(p=0.12)。ZC 组的平均垂直边缘间隙为 27±11.05μm,而 GC 组为 35.33±10.49μm,两组间差异无统计学意义(P=0.058)。两组中混合失效模式更常见(93%):就所有测试参数而言,氧化锆根锁与金根锁相当。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Tensile Bond Strength, Fit Accuracy and Failure Types of Zirconia and Cast Gold Root Copings for Overdentures.

Aim: To compare the tensile strength, dislodgement forces, marginal gap and failure types between digitally fabricated zirconia root copings and conventionally manufactured cast gold root copings.

Methods: Extracted human teeth (N=30) were prepared for the root copings and randomly divided into 2 groups: (1)zirconia root copings(ZC) and gold root copings(GC). The specimens were tested for tensile bond strength and dislodgement forces in a universal testing machine and the types of the coping failures modes were analyzed. In addition, the marginal gap was measured. Data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA and Pearson correlation test.

Results: Mean tensile bond strength in the total horizontal adhesive area for ZC group was 7.5±2.8MPa and for GC group 10.5±4.8 MPa(p⟩0.05). The mean dislodgement forces for the ZC and GC groups were 242±107N and 311±118N, respectively and with no significant differences between the groups (p=0.12). The mean vertical marginal gap in the ZC group amounted to 27±11.05μm, while in the GC group it was 35.33±10.49μm, showing no statistically significant difference between the two groups (p=0.058). Mixed failure modes were more common (93%) in both groups.

Conclusions: In terms of all tested parameters, the zirconia root copings were comparable to the gold copings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry is published quarterly and includes clinical and research articles in subjects such as prosthodontics, operative dentistry, implantology, endodontics, periodontics and dental materials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信