根据现代汽车座椅和助推器尺寸对儿童人体测量进行评估。

Q2 Medicine
Gretchen H Baker, Rosalie R Connell, Carrie A Rhodes, Julie A Mansfield
{"title":"根据现代汽车座椅和助推器尺寸对儿童人体测量进行评估。","authors":"Gretchen H Baker, Rosalie R Connell, Carrie A Rhodes, Julie A Mansfield","doi":"10.4271/2024-22-0004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study compared modern vehicle and booster geometries with relevant child anthropometries. Vehicle geometries (seat length, seat pan height, shoulder belt outlet height, and roof height) were obtained for 275 center and outboard rear seating positions of US vehicles (MY 2009-2022). Measurements of 85 US boosters (pan height and pan length) and anthropometries of 80 US children between 4-14yo (seated height, thigh length, leg length, and seated shoulder height) were also collected. Comparisons were made between vehicles, boosters, and child anthropometries. Average vehicle seat lengths exceeded child thigh lengths (+9.5cm). Only 16.4% of seating positions had seat lengths less than the child thigh length mean+1SD. Even for children at least 145cm, only 18.8% had thigh lengths greater than the average vehicle seat length. Child thigh lengths were more comparable with average booster seat pan lengths for all multi-mode and high-back designs (-2.0cm) and low-back boosters (+3.1cm). The average observed booster pan height (9.9cm) would help most children achieve seated shoulder heights similar to the Hybrid III 5th percentile Female ATD. Compared to vehicle seats, booster geometries were more compatible with child thigh lengths and assist children in achieving seated shoulder heights more comparable to the vehicle restraint system. This emphasizes the continued need for shorter vehicle seat cushion lengths for these occupants and the need to educate caregivers and promote booster recommendations which highlight the importance of achieving proper belt fit and avoiding slouched postures, even for children greater than 8 years and/or 145cm.</p>","PeriodicalId":35289,"journal":{"name":"Stapp car crash journal","volume":"68 ","pages":"57-88"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of Child Anthropometries in Relation to Modern Vehicle Seat and Booster Dimensions.\",\"authors\":\"Gretchen H Baker, Rosalie R Connell, Carrie A Rhodes, Julie A Mansfield\",\"doi\":\"10.4271/2024-22-0004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study compared modern vehicle and booster geometries with relevant child anthropometries. Vehicle geometries (seat length, seat pan height, shoulder belt outlet height, and roof height) were obtained for 275 center and outboard rear seating positions of US vehicles (MY 2009-2022). Measurements of 85 US boosters (pan height and pan length) and anthropometries of 80 US children between 4-14yo (seated height, thigh length, leg length, and seated shoulder height) were also collected. Comparisons were made between vehicles, boosters, and child anthropometries. Average vehicle seat lengths exceeded child thigh lengths (+9.5cm). Only 16.4% of seating positions had seat lengths less than the child thigh length mean+1SD. Even for children at least 145cm, only 18.8% had thigh lengths greater than the average vehicle seat length. Child thigh lengths were more comparable with average booster seat pan lengths for all multi-mode and high-back designs (-2.0cm) and low-back boosters (+3.1cm). The average observed booster pan height (9.9cm) would help most children achieve seated shoulder heights similar to the Hybrid III 5th percentile Female ATD. Compared to vehicle seats, booster geometries were more compatible with child thigh lengths and assist children in achieving seated shoulder heights more comparable to the vehicle restraint system. This emphasizes the continued need for shorter vehicle seat cushion lengths for these occupants and the need to educate caregivers and promote booster recommendations which highlight the importance of achieving proper belt fit and avoiding slouched postures, even for children greater than 8 years and/or 145cm.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":35289,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Stapp car crash journal\",\"volume\":\"68 \",\"pages\":\"57-88\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Stapp car crash journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4271/2024-22-0004\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stapp car crash journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4271/2024-22-0004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究将现代汽车和助力车的几何尺寸与相关儿童人体测量数据进行了比较。研究人员获得了美国汽车(2009-2022 年)275 个中间和外侧后座位置的车辆几何尺寸(座椅长度、座垫高度、肩带出口高度和车顶高度)。此外,还收集了 85 个美国助推器的测量数据(座垫高度和座垫长度)和 80 个 4-14 岁美国儿童的人体测量数据(坐姿高度、大腿长度、腿长和坐姿肩高)。对车辆、助推器和儿童的人体测量数据进行了比较。汽车座椅的平均长度超过了儿童的大腿长度(+9.5 厘米)。只有 16.4% 的座位长度小于儿童大腿长度平均值+1SD。即使是 145 厘米以上的儿童,也只有 18.8%的儿童大腿长度大于车辆座椅的平均长度。所有多模式和高靠背设计(-2.0 厘米)和低靠背助推器(+3.1 厘米)的儿童大腿长度与助推器座椅的平均盘长比较接近。观察到的助推器平均盘高(9.9 厘米)可帮助大多数儿童达到与混合型 III 第 5 百分位女性 ATD 相似的坐姿肩高。与汽车座椅相比,助推器的几何形状更符合儿童的大腿长度,有助于儿童达到与汽车约束系统更接近的坐姿肩高。这强调了继续缩短这些乘员的汽车座椅坐垫长度的必要性,以及教育看护者和推广助推器建议的必要性,这些建议强调了实现正确的安全带配合和避免懒散姿势的重要性,即使是对 8 岁和/或 145 厘米以上的儿童也是如此。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of Child Anthropometries in Relation to Modern Vehicle Seat and Booster Dimensions.

This study compared modern vehicle and booster geometries with relevant child anthropometries. Vehicle geometries (seat length, seat pan height, shoulder belt outlet height, and roof height) were obtained for 275 center and outboard rear seating positions of US vehicles (MY 2009-2022). Measurements of 85 US boosters (pan height and pan length) and anthropometries of 80 US children between 4-14yo (seated height, thigh length, leg length, and seated shoulder height) were also collected. Comparisons were made between vehicles, boosters, and child anthropometries. Average vehicle seat lengths exceeded child thigh lengths (+9.5cm). Only 16.4% of seating positions had seat lengths less than the child thigh length mean+1SD. Even for children at least 145cm, only 18.8% had thigh lengths greater than the average vehicle seat length. Child thigh lengths were more comparable with average booster seat pan lengths for all multi-mode and high-back designs (-2.0cm) and low-back boosters (+3.1cm). The average observed booster pan height (9.9cm) would help most children achieve seated shoulder heights similar to the Hybrid III 5th percentile Female ATD. Compared to vehicle seats, booster geometries were more compatible with child thigh lengths and assist children in achieving seated shoulder heights more comparable to the vehicle restraint system. This emphasizes the continued need for shorter vehicle seat cushion lengths for these occupants and the need to educate caregivers and promote booster recommendations which highlight the importance of achieving proper belt fit and avoiding slouched postures, even for children greater than 8 years and/or 145cm.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Stapp car crash journal
Stapp car crash journal Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信