是否已就原发性梗阻性巨输尿管的治疗达成共识?

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Romy Gander, Marino Asensio, Manuel Lopez
{"title":"是否已就原发性梗阻性巨输尿管的治疗达成共识?","authors":"Romy Gander, Marino Asensio, Manuel Lopez","doi":"10.1016/j.urology.2024.10.077","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To analyze the results of a survey regarding the opinion of experts in diagnosis and management of primary obstructive megaureter (POM) and to determine if their current therapeutic strategy matches with the British Association of Pediatric Urologist recommendations, published in 2014.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From February 1 to June 30, 2023, an online-based survey was distributed through the eUROGEN network and some pediatric urology societies. The questionnaire was carried out using google forms and consisted of 14 questions. Additionally, a literature review of the most recent articles was performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred three medical professionals completed the survey, 98 (96.1%) were pediatric urologists. 67.3% of respondents agreed with starting continuous antibiotic prophylaxis in all patients with POM. The diagnosis of obstruction is mostly made based on a combination of findings which include initial DRF <40%, drop of DRF of >5% on serial scans and worsening of dilation at follow-up ultrasound (63.7%). When specifically asked if initial DRF <40% as a solely finding without symptoms or massive dilatation was considered as an indication for early surgery, only 12 (11.9%) considered it so. Regarding ureteral reimplantation under the age of 1, 46 (45.1%) were confident in this procedure. Among temporizing interventions, high-pressure endoscopic balloon dilatation was the most popular.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Current trends in the diagnosis and management of POM may challenge some of the British Association of Pediatric Urologist recommendations, especially in regards initial DRF <40% as a solely indication of surgery and the most popular temporizing procedures. It may be time to elaborate a new updated consensus and decide a common updated approach for all patients with POM.</p>","PeriodicalId":23415,"journal":{"name":"Urology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Is There a Consensus on the Management of Primary Obstructive Megaureter?\",\"authors\":\"Romy Gander, Marino Asensio, Manuel Lopez\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.urology.2024.10.077\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To analyze the results of a survey regarding the opinion of experts in diagnosis and management of primary obstructive megaureter (POM) and to determine if their current therapeutic strategy matches with the British Association of Pediatric Urologist recommendations, published in 2014.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From February 1 to June 30, 2023, an online-based survey was distributed through the eUROGEN network and some pediatric urology societies. The questionnaire was carried out using google forms and consisted of 14 questions. Additionally, a literature review of the most recent articles was performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred three medical professionals completed the survey, 98 (96.1%) were pediatric urologists. 67.3% of respondents agreed with starting continuous antibiotic prophylaxis in all patients with POM. The diagnosis of obstruction is mostly made based on a combination of findings which include initial DRF <40%, drop of DRF of >5% on serial scans and worsening of dilation at follow-up ultrasound (63.7%). When specifically asked if initial DRF <40% as a solely finding without symptoms or massive dilatation was considered as an indication for early surgery, only 12 (11.9%) considered it so. Regarding ureteral reimplantation under the age of 1, 46 (45.1%) were confident in this procedure. Among temporizing interventions, high-pressure endoscopic balloon dilatation was the most popular.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Current trends in the diagnosis and management of POM may challenge some of the British Association of Pediatric Urologist recommendations, especially in regards initial DRF <40% as a solely indication of surgery and the most popular temporizing procedures. It may be time to elaborate a new updated consensus and decide a common updated approach for all patients with POM.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23415,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Urology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Urology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2024.10.077\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2024.10.077","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

调查目的分析有关原发性梗阻性巨输尿管(POM)诊断和管理专家意见的调查结果,并确定他们目前的治疗策略是否符合 2014 年发布的 BAPU 建议:方法:从 2023 年 2 月 1 日至 6 月 30 日,通过 eUROGEN 网络和一些小儿泌尿外科学会分发了一份在线调查问卷。调查问卷使用谷歌表格,包含 14 个问题。此外,还对最新文章进行了文献综述:103名医务人员完成了调查,其中98人(96.1%)为儿科泌尿科医生。67.3%的受访者同意对所有POM患者开始持续抗生素预防治疗(CAP)。梗阻的诊断大多基于一系列综合结果,包括连续扫描的初始 DRF 为 5%,以及随访超声检查时扩张情况恶化(63.7%)。当被具体问及最初的 DRF < 40% 是否仅作为无症状或大面积扩张的发现而被视为早期手术的指征时,只有 12 人(11.9%)这样认为。关于 1 岁以下儿童的输尿管再植术(UR),46 人(45.1%)对该手术有信心。在临时干预措施中,高压内窥镜球囊扩张术(HPBD)最受欢迎:结论:POM 诊断和管理的当前趋势可能会对 BAPU 的某些建议提出质疑,尤其是将初始 DRF < 40% 作为手术的唯一指征以及最受欢迎的临时性手术。也许是时候制定新的最新共识,并为所有POM患者决定一种共同的最新方法了。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Is There a Consensus on the Management of Primary Obstructive Megaureter?

Objective: To analyze the results of a survey regarding the opinion of experts in diagnosis and management of primary obstructive megaureter (POM) and to determine if their current therapeutic strategy matches with the British Association of Pediatric Urologist recommendations, published in 2014.

Methods: From February 1 to June 30, 2023, an online-based survey was distributed through the eUROGEN network and some pediatric urology societies. The questionnaire was carried out using google forms and consisted of 14 questions. Additionally, a literature review of the most recent articles was performed.

Results: One hundred three medical professionals completed the survey, 98 (96.1%) were pediatric urologists. 67.3% of respondents agreed with starting continuous antibiotic prophylaxis in all patients with POM. The diagnosis of obstruction is mostly made based on a combination of findings which include initial DRF <40%, drop of DRF of >5% on serial scans and worsening of dilation at follow-up ultrasound (63.7%). When specifically asked if initial DRF <40% as a solely finding without symptoms or massive dilatation was considered as an indication for early surgery, only 12 (11.9%) considered it so. Regarding ureteral reimplantation under the age of 1, 46 (45.1%) were confident in this procedure. Among temporizing interventions, high-pressure endoscopic balloon dilatation was the most popular.

Conclusion: Current trends in the diagnosis and management of POM may challenge some of the British Association of Pediatric Urologist recommendations, especially in regards initial DRF <40% as a solely indication of surgery and the most popular temporizing procedures. It may be time to elaborate a new updated consensus and decide a common updated approach for all patients with POM.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Urology
Urology 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
9.50%
发文量
716
审稿时长
59 days
期刊介绍: Urology is a monthly, peer–reviewed journal primarily for urologists, residents, interns, nephrologists, and other specialists interested in urology The mission of Urology®, the "Gold Journal," is to provide practical, timely, and relevant clinical and basic science information to physicians and researchers practicing the art of urology worldwide. Urology® publishes original articles relating to adult and pediatric clinical urology as well as to clinical and basic science research. Topics in Urology® include pediatrics, surgical oncology, radiology, pathology, erectile dysfunction, infertility, incontinence, transplantation, endourology, andrology, female urology, reconstructive surgery, and medical oncology, as well as relevant basic science issues. Special features include rapid communication of important timely issues, surgeon''s workshops, interesting case reports, surgical techniques, clinical and basic science review articles, guest editorials, letters to the editor, book reviews, and historical articles in urology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信