与 PCDF 相比,ACDF 提高了老年颈椎间盘突出症患者的出院率:倾向匹配分析

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Bahie Ezzat, Priya Bhanot, Roshini Kalagara, Yehia Elkersh, Muhammad Ali, Charles Laurore, Matthew T Carr, Alexander J Schüpper, Hanya M Qureshi, Eugene Hrabarchuk, Addison Quinones, Jonathan Gal, Tanvir F Choudhri
{"title":"与 PCDF 相比,ACDF 提高了老年颈椎间盘突出症患者的出院率:倾向匹配分析","authors":"Bahie Ezzat, Priya Bhanot, Roshini Kalagara, Yehia Elkersh, Muhammad Ali, Charles Laurore, Matthew T Carr, Alexander J Schüpper, Hanya M Qureshi, Eugene Hrabarchuk, Addison Quinones, Jonathan Gal, Tanvir F Choudhri","doi":"10.1016/j.wneu.2024.10.145","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Cervical disc herniation often necessitates surgery in elderly patients when nonoperative treatments fail. This study compares discharge outcomes of Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion (ACDF) versus Posterior Cervical Decompression and Fusion (PCDF) in geriatric patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis of 8,622 spine surgery patients (January 2008-December 2020) was performed. Geriatric patients (age ≥65) undergoing primary 2-4 level ACDF or PCDF were included. Propensity score matching (1:1) based on age, sex, ethnicity, body mass index, insurance, American Society of Anesthesiologists classification, Elixhauser comorbidity index, preoperative diagnosis, fusion levels, estimated blood loss (EBL), intraoperative transfusion, and procedure length was used. Discharge outcomes were dichotomized to home or non-home.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After matching, 122 patients (ACDF=61, PCDF=61) were analyzed. A larger proportion of ACDF patients were discharged home compared to PCDF (84% vs. 64%, p=0.02). On binary logistic regression, younger age (OR=0.88 [0.79, 0.98], p=0.02), male sex (OR=2.04 [1.79, 3.28], p=0.001), lower EBL (OR=0.99 [0.99, 0.99], p=0.001), intraoperative transfusion (OR=0.43 [0.22, 0.92], p=0.03), and ACDF approach (OR=4.34 [1.91, 6.77], p=0.01) were significant predictors of home discharge.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ACDF in geriatric patients with cervical disc herniation was associated with higher rates of home discharge compared to PCDF. Tailored surgical approaches based on patient demographics may improve recovery outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":23906,"journal":{"name":"World neurosurgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"ACDF Associated with Increased Home Discharge Rates in Geriatric Patients with Cervical Disc Herniation Compared to PCDF: A Propensity-Matched Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Bahie Ezzat, Priya Bhanot, Roshini Kalagara, Yehia Elkersh, Muhammad Ali, Charles Laurore, Matthew T Carr, Alexander J Schüpper, Hanya M Qureshi, Eugene Hrabarchuk, Addison Quinones, Jonathan Gal, Tanvir F Choudhri\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.wneu.2024.10.145\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Cervical disc herniation often necessitates surgery in elderly patients when nonoperative treatments fail. This study compares discharge outcomes of Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion (ACDF) versus Posterior Cervical Decompression and Fusion (PCDF) in geriatric patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis of 8,622 spine surgery patients (January 2008-December 2020) was performed. Geriatric patients (age ≥65) undergoing primary 2-4 level ACDF or PCDF were included. Propensity score matching (1:1) based on age, sex, ethnicity, body mass index, insurance, American Society of Anesthesiologists classification, Elixhauser comorbidity index, preoperative diagnosis, fusion levels, estimated blood loss (EBL), intraoperative transfusion, and procedure length was used. Discharge outcomes were dichotomized to home or non-home.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After matching, 122 patients (ACDF=61, PCDF=61) were analyzed. A larger proportion of ACDF patients were discharged home compared to PCDF (84% vs. 64%, p=0.02). On binary logistic regression, younger age (OR=0.88 [0.79, 0.98], p=0.02), male sex (OR=2.04 [1.79, 3.28], p=0.001), lower EBL (OR=0.99 [0.99, 0.99], p=0.001), intraoperative transfusion (OR=0.43 [0.22, 0.92], p=0.03), and ACDF approach (OR=4.34 [1.91, 6.77], p=0.01) were significant predictors of home discharge.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ACDF in geriatric patients with cervical disc herniation was associated with higher rates of home discharge compared to PCDF. Tailored surgical approaches based on patient demographics may improve recovery outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23906,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"World neurosurgery\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"World neurosurgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2024.10.145\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2024.10.145","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

引言老年颈椎间盘突出症患者在非手术治疗无效的情况下往往需要进行手术治疗。本研究比较了老年患者接受颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术(ACDF)和颈椎后路减压融合术(PCDF)的出院疗效:对8622名脊柱手术患者(2008年1月至2020年12月)进行了回顾性分析。纳入了接受初级 2-4 级 ACDF 或 PCDF 手术的老年患者(年龄≥65 岁)。根据年龄、性别、种族、体重指数、保险、美国麻醉医师协会分类、Elixhauser 合并症指数、术前诊断、融合程度、估计失血量 (EBL)、术中输血量和手术时长进行倾向评分匹配(1:1)。出院结果分为在家和不在家两种:结果:配对后,分析了122例患者(ACDF=61例,PCDF=61例)。与 PCDF 相比,ACDF 患者出院回家的比例更高(84% 对 64%,P=0.02)。在二元逻辑回归中,年龄较小(OR=0.88 [0.79, 0.98],P=0.02)、性别为男(OR=2.04 [1.79, 3.28],P=0.001)、EBL 较低(OR=0.99 [0.99, 0.99],P=0.001)、术中输血(OR=0.43 [0.22,0.92],P=0.03)和ACDF方法(OR=4.34 [1.91,6.77],P=0.01)是出院回家的重要预测因素:结论:与 PCDF 相比,老年颈椎间盘突出症患者接受 ACDF 治疗的出院率更高。结论:与 PCDF 相比,ACDF 治疗老年颈椎间盘突出症患者的出院率更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
ACDF Associated with Increased Home Discharge Rates in Geriatric Patients with Cervical Disc Herniation Compared to PCDF: A Propensity-Matched Analysis.

Introduction: Cervical disc herniation often necessitates surgery in elderly patients when nonoperative treatments fail. This study compares discharge outcomes of Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion (ACDF) versus Posterior Cervical Decompression and Fusion (PCDF) in geriatric patients.

Methods: A retrospective analysis of 8,622 spine surgery patients (January 2008-December 2020) was performed. Geriatric patients (age ≥65) undergoing primary 2-4 level ACDF or PCDF were included. Propensity score matching (1:1) based on age, sex, ethnicity, body mass index, insurance, American Society of Anesthesiologists classification, Elixhauser comorbidity index, preoperative diagnosis, fusion levels, estimated blood loss (EBL), intraoperative transfusion, and procedure length was used. Discharge outcomes were dichotomized to home or non-home.

Results: After matching, 122 patients (ACDF=61, PCDF=61) were analyzed. A larger proportion of ACDF patients were discharged home compared to PCDF (84% vs. 64%, p=0.02). On binary logistic regression, younger age (OR=0.88 [0.79, 0.98], p=0.02), male sex (OR=2.04 [1.79, 3.28], p=0.001), lower EBL (OR=0.99 [0.99, 0.99], p=0.001), intraoperative transfusion (OR=0.43 [0.22, 0.92], p=0.03), and ACDF approach (OR=4.34 [1.91, 6.77], p=0.01) were significant predictors of home discharge.

Conclusion: ACDF in geriatric patients with cervical disc herniation was associated with higher rates of home discharge compared to PCDF. Tailored surgical approaches based on patient demographics may improve recovery outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
World neurosurgery
World neurosurgery CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-SURGERY
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
15.00%
发文量
1765
审稿时长
47 days
期刊介绍: World Neurosurgery has an open access mirror journal World Neurosurgery: X, sharing the same aims and scope, editorial team, submission system and rigorous peer review. The journal''s mission is to: -To provide a first-class international forum and a 2-way conduit for dialogue that is relevant to neurosurgeons and providers who care for neurosurgery patients. The categories of the exchanged information include clinical and basic science, as well as global information that provide social, political, educational, economic, cultural or societal insights and knowledge that are of significance and relevance to worldwide neurosurgery patient care. -To act as a primary intellectual catalyst for the stimulation of creativity, the creation of new knowledge, and the enhancement of quality neurosurgical care worldwide. -To provide a forum for communication that enriches the lives of all neurosurgeons and their colleagues; and, in so doing, enriches the lives of their patients. Topics to be addressed in World Neurosurgery include: EDUCATION, ECONOMICS, RESEARCH, POLITICS, HISTORY, CULTURE, CLINICAL SCIENCE, LABORATORY SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY, OPERATIVE TECHNIQUES, CLINICAL IMAGES, VIDEOS
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信