目标剂量:HEAL 试验中缺氧缺血性脑病新生儿的促红细胞生成素暴露。

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS
Adam Frymoyer, Ana Gabriela Vasconcelos, Sandra E Juul, Bryan A Comstock, Patrick J Heagerty, Yvonne W Wu
{"title":"目标剂量:HEAL 试验中缺氧缺血性脑病新生儿的促红细胞生成素暴露。","authors":"Adam Frymoyer, Ana Gabriela Vasconcelos, Sandra E Juul, Bryan A Comstock, Patrick J Heagerty, Yvonne W Wu","doi":"10.1038/s41390-024-03709-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The High-Dose Erythropoietin for Asphyxia and Encephalopathy (HEAL) trial for neonates with hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (HIE) treated with therapeutic hypothermia demonstrated no neurodevelopmental benefit but was associated with a higher rate of serious adverse events (SAEs). Understanding if targeted Epo plasma exposures were achieved in the HEAL trial and if SAEs were associated with higher exposures would help future therapeutic programs of Epo as a candidate neuroprotective treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Ancillary study of a subset of HEAL neonates who received Epo (1000 U/kg IV on days 1, 2, 3, 4, and 7) and had plasma drug concentrations measured. Within a Bayesian pharmacokinetic framework, the area under the curve during the first 48 h (AUC<sub>48h</sub>) and 7 days (AUC<sub>7d</sub>) of treatment was estimated. The % of neonates who achieved animal model neuroprotective targets of AUC<sub>48h</sub> >140,000 mU*h/ml and AUC<sub>7d</sub> >420,000 mU*h/ml was calculated. The relationship between AUC<sub>7d</sub> and SAEs after study drug was evaluated using logistic regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among n = 89 neonates, variation in Epo exposure was low, and over 95% of neonates achieved the target AUC<sub>48h</sub> and AUC<sub>7d</sub>. No meaningful relationship was seen between AUC<sub>7d</sub> and risk of SAE.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The Epo dosing strategy in the HEAL trial consistently achieved target plasma exposures. Higher exposures were not associated with SAEs.</p><p><strong>Impact: </strong>In the HEAL randomized, placebo-controlled trial of high-dose erythropoietin (Epo) for neonates with hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (HIE) receiving therapeutic hypothermia, the Epo dosing strategy achieved animal model neuroprotective plasma exposure targets in >95% of neonates. This understanding further strengthens the HEAL trial's primary conclusion that Epo provides no additional benefit in neonates with HIE also receiving therapeutic hypothermia. While Epo treatment was associated with a higher rate of serious adverse events (SAEs) compared to placebo in the primary HEAL trial, higher plasma exposures of Epo were not associated with the risk of SAEs.</p>","PeriodicalId":19829,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On target dosing: erythropoietin exposure in neonates with hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy in the HEAL trial.\",\"authors\":\"Adam Frymoyer, Ana Gabriela Vasconcelos, Sandra E Juul, Bryan A Comstock, Patrick J Heagerty, Yvonne W Wu\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41390-024-03709-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The High-Dose Erythropoietin for Asphyxia and Encephalopathy (HEAL) trial for neonates with hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (HIE) treated with therapeutic hypothermia demonstrated no neurodevelopmental benefit but was associated with a higher rate of serious adverse events (SAEs). Understanding if targeted Epo plasma exposures were achieved in the HEAL trial and if SAEs were associated with higher exposures would help future therapeutic programs of Epo as a candidate neuroprotective treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Ancillary study of a subset of HEAL neonates who received Epo (1000 U/kg IV on days 1, 2, 3, 4, and 7) and had plasma drug concentrations measured. Within a Bayesian pharmacokinetic framework, the area under the curve during the first 48 h (AUC<sub>48h</sub>) and 7 days (AUC<sub>7d</sub>) of treatment was estimated. The % of neonates who achieved animal model neuroprotective targets of AUC<sub>48h</sub> >140,000 mU*h/ml and AUC<sub>7d</sub> >420,000 mU*h/ml was calculated. The relationship between AUC<sub>7d</sub> and SAEs after study drug was evaluated using logistic regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among n = 89 neonates, variation in Epo exposure was low, and over 95% of neonates achieved the target AUC<sub>48h</sub> and AUC<sub>7d</sub>. No meaningful relationship was seen between AUC<sub>7d</sub> and risk of SAE.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The Epo dosing strategy in the HEAL trial consistently achieved target plasma exposures. Higher exposures were not associated with SAEs.</p><p><strong>Impact: </strong>In the HEAL randomized, placebo-controlled trial of high-dose erythropoietin (Epo) for neonates with hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (HIE) receiving therapeutic hypothermia, the Epo dosing strategy achieved animal model neuroprotective plasma exposure targets in >95% of neonates. This understanding further strengthens the HEAL trial's primary conclusion that Epo provides no additional benefit in neonates with HIE also receiving therapeutic hypothermia. While Epo treatment was associated with a higher rate of serious adverse events (SAEs) compared to placebo in the primary HEAL trial, higher plasma exposures of Epo were not associated with the risk of SAEs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19829,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pediatric Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pediatric Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41390-024-03709-z\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41390-024-03709-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究背景大剂量促红细胞生成素治疗窒息和脑病(HEAL)试验对缺氧缺血性脑病(HIE)新生儿进行了治疗性低温治疗,结果表明该疗法对神经发育无益,但与较高的严重不良事件(SAEs)发生率有关。了解 HEAL 试验是否达到了 Epo 目标血浆暴露量,以及 SAE 是否与较高暴露量相关,将有助于未来将 Epo 作为神经保护治疗候选药物的治疗计划:方法:对接受 Epo(第 1、2、3、4 和 7 天,1000 U/kg,静脉注射)并测量血浆药物浓度的 HEAL 新生儿子集进行辅助研究。在贝叶斯药代动力学框架内,估算了治疗头 48 小时(AUC48h)和 7 天(AUC7d)的曲线下面积。计算了达到 AUC48h >140,000 mU*h/ml 和 AUC7d >420,000 mU*h/ml 动物模型神经保护目标的新生儿百分比。使用逻辑回归评估了AUC7d与用药后SAE之间的关系:结果:在89名新生儿中,Epo暴露量的变化很小,超过95%的新生儿达到了目标AUC48h和AUC7d。AUC7d与SAE风险之间没有明显关系:结论:HEAL试验中的Epo给药策略始终能达到目标血浆暴露量。结论:HEAL 试验中的 Epo 给药策略始终能达到目标血浆暴露量,较高的暴露量与 SAEs 无关:影响:在对接受治疗性低温的缺氧缺血性脑病(HIE)新生儿进行高剂量促红细胞生成素(Epo)治疗的 HEAL 随机安慰剂对照试验中,Epo 给药策略在超过 95% 的新生儿中达到了动物模型神经保护血浆暴露目标。这一认识进一步加强了 HEAL 试验的主要结论,即 Epo 对同时接受治疗性低温的 HIE 新生儿没有额外益处。虽然在 HEAL 主要试验中,与安慰剂相比,Epo 治疗与较高的严重不良事件(SAEs)发生率有关,但较高的 Epo 血浆暴露与 SAEs 风险无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
On target dosing: erythropoietin exposure in neonates with hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy in the HEAL trial.

Background: The High-Dose Erythropoietin for Asphyxia and Encephalopathy (HEAL) trial for neonates with hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (HIE) treated with therapeutic hypothermia demonstrated no neurodevelopmental benefit but was associated with a higher rate of serious adverse events (SAEs). Understanding if targeted Epo plasma exposures were achieved in the HEAL trial and if SAEs were associated with higher exposures would help future therapeutic programs of Epo as a candidate neuroprotective treatment.

Methods: Ancillary study of a subset of HEAL neonates who received Epo (1000 U/kg IV on days 1, 2, 3, 4, and 7) and had plasma drug concentrations measured. Within a Bayesian pharmacokinetic framework, the area under the curve during the first 48 h (AUC48h) and 7 days (AUC7d) of treatment was estimated. The % of neonates who achieved animal model neuroprotective targets of AUC48h >140,000 mU*h/ml and AUC7d >420,000 mU*h/ml was calculated. The relationship between AUC7d and SAEs after study drug was evaluated using logistic regression.

Results: Among n = 89 neonates, variation in Epo exposure was low, and over 95% of neonates achieved the target AUC48h and AUC7d. No meaningful relationship was seen between AUC7d and risk of SAE.

Conclusions: The Epo dosing strategy in the HEAL trial consistently achieved target plasma exposures. Higher exposures were not associated with SAEs.

Impact: In the HEAL randomized, placebo-controlled trial of high-dose erythropoietin (Epo) for neonates with hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (HIE) receiving therapeutic hypothermia, the Epo dosing strategy achieved animal model neuroprotective plasma exposure targets in >95% of neonates. This understanding further strengthens the HEAL trial's primary conclusion that Epo provides no additional benefit in neonates with HIE also receiving therapeutic hypothermia. While Epo treatment was associated with a higher rate of serious adverse events (SAEs) compared to placebo in the primary HEAL trial, higher plasma exposures of Epo were not associated with the risk of SAEs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pediatric Research
Pediatric Research 医学-小儿科
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
5.60%
发文量
473
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Pediatric Research publishes original papers, invited reviews, and commentaries on the etiologies of children''s diseases and disorders of development, extending from molecular biology to epidemiology. Use of model organisms and in vitro techniques relevant to developmental biology and medicine are acceptable, as are translational human studies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信