夫妻生活方式干预对改变体重的有效性:随机对照试验的系统回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 1.9 Q3 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Eirini-Iro Arvanitidou, Fotini Tsofliou, Juliet Wood, Ioulia Tsatsani
{"title":"夫妻生活方式干预对改变体重的有效性:随机对照试验的系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Eirini-Iro Arvanitidou, Fotini Tsofliou, Juliet Wood, Ioulia Tsatsani","doi":"10.1177/02601060241291123","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction:</b> Lifestyle interventions aiming to reduce excess body weight have been focusing on individuals living with overweight or obesity. However, many health-related behaviors including eating are concordant in couples indicating they might share an obesity risk or support each other's weight loss efforts. <b>Aim:</b> The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials was to assess the weight change effects of lifestyle interventions targeting couples in a romantic relationship regardless of marital status or sexual preference compared to individuals or no intervention. <b>Methods:</b> Four databases (MEDLINE Ovid, Scopus, CINHAL, and mySearch: EBSCO-Discovery-Service-Tool) were systematically searched from inception until 26<sup>th</sup> April 2021 with further email alerts. The risk of bias was assessed using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme. Meta-analysis was conducted using the random-effect model to estimate the weighted mean difference with 95% confidence interval. <b>Results:</b> Seventeen studies were eligible for this review and 11 of them were included in the meta-analysis for weight change. Significant intervention effects were identified for body weight in couples' intervention vs. individual intervention (-2.25 kg, 95% CI-3.63 to-0.88), and vs. no intervention (-4.5 kg, 95% CI-6.62 to-2.38). <b>Conclusion:</b> This systematic review and meta-analysis was the first to investigate the effectiveness of lifestyle interventions targeting couples on weight loss, compared to interventions focused on individuals or standard care. The findings suggest that interventions aimed at couples lead to greater weight loss, though the results should be interpreted with caution due to the wide heterogeneity among the studies. Further research is needed with evidence-based study designs, targeting younger participants, and incorporating longer intervention durations and follow-up periods.</p>","PeriodicalId":19352,"journal":{"name":"Nutrition and health","volume":" ","pages":"2601060241291123"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The effectiveness of couples' lifestyle interventions on weight change: A systematic review and meta-analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials.\",\"authors\":\"Eirini-Iro Arvanitidou, Fotini Tsofliou, Juliet Wood, Ioulia Tsatsani\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/02601060241291123\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Introduction:</b> Lifestyle interventions aiming to reduce excess body weight have been focusing on individuals living with overweight or obesity. However, many health-related behaviors including eating are concordant in couples indicating they might share an obesity risk or support each other's weight loss efforts. <b>Aim:</b> The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials was to assess the weight change effects of lifestyle interventions targeting couples in a romantic relationship regardless of marital status or sexual preference compared to individuals or no intervention. <b>Methods:</b> Four databases (MEDLINE Ovid, Scopus, CINHAL, and mySearch: EBSCO-Discovery-Service-Tool) were systematically searched from inception until 26<sup>th</sup> April 2021 with further email alerts. The risk of bias was assessed using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme. Meta-analysis was conducted using the random-effect model to estimate the weighted mean difference with 95% confidence interval. <b>Results:</b> Seventeen studies were eligible for this review and 11 of them were included in the meta-analysis for weight change. Significant intervention effects were identified for body weight in couples' intervention vs. individual intervention (-2.25 kg, 95% CI-3.63 to-0.88), and vs. no intervention (-4.5 kg, 95% CI-6.62 to-2.38). <b>Conclusion:</b> This systematic review and meta-analysis was the first to investigate the effectiveness of lifestyle interventions targeting couples on weight loss, compared to interventions focused on individuals or standard care. The findings suggest that interventions aimed at couples lead to greater weight loss, though the results should be interpreted with caution due to the wide heterogeneity among the studies. Further research is needed with evidence-based study designs, targeting younger participants, and incorporating longer intervention durations and follow-up periods.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19352,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nutrition and health\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"2601060241291123\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nutrition and health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/02601060241291123\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NUTRITION & DIETETICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nutrition and health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02601060241291123","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:旨在减少体重超标的生活方式干预措施主要针对超重或肥胖患者。然而,许多与健康相关的行为(包括饮食)在夫妇间是一致的,这表明他们可能有共同的肥胖风险或支持彼此的减肥努力。目的:本随机对照试验的系统回顾和荟萃分析旨在评估生活方式干预措施对改变体重的影响,这些干预措施以恋爱关系中的情侣为对象,无论其婚姻状况或性偏好如何,与个人干预措施或无干预措施相比。研究方法对四个数据库(MEDLINE Ovid、Scopus、CINHAL 和 mySearch:EBSCO-Discovery-Service-Tool)进行了系统检索,检索时间从开始到 2021 年 4 月 26 日,并通过电子邮件提醒。使用 "批判性评估技能计划 "对偏倚风险进行了评估。采用随机效应模型进行 Meta 分析,以估算加权平均差和 95% 的置信区间。研究结果有 17 项研究符合本综述的要求,其中 11 项被纳入了体重变化的元分析。夫妻干预与个人干预(-2.25 千克,95% CI-3.63 至-0.88)和不干预(-4.5 千克,95% CI-6.62 至-2.38)对体重有显著的干预效果。结论本系统综述和荟萃分析首次研究了针对夫妻的生活方式干预与针对个人的干预或标准护理相比,对减肥的有效性。研究结果表明,以夫妇为对象的干预措施能使体重减轻更多,但由于研究之间存在很大的异质性,因此在解释结果时应谨慎。进一步的研究还需要循证研究设计、针对更年轻的参与者以及更长的干预持续时间和随访期。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The effectiveness of couples' lifestyle interventions on weight change: A systematic review and meta-analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials.

Introduction: Lifestyle interventions aiming to reduce excess body weight have been focusing on individuals living with overweight or obesity. However, many health-related behaviors including eating are concordant in couples indicating they might share an obesity risk or support each other's weight loss efforts. Aim: The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials was to assess the weight change effects of lifestyle interventions targeting couples in a romantic relationship regardless of marital status or sexual preference compared to individuals or no intervention. Methods: Four databases (MEDLINE Ovid, Scopus, CINHAL, and mySearch: EBSCO-Discovery-Service-Tool) were systematically searched from inception until 26th April 2021 with further email alerts. The risk of bias was assessed using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme. Meta-analysis was conducted using the random-effect model to estimate the weighted mean difference with 95% confidence interval. Results: Seventeen studies were eligible for this review and 11 of them were included in the meta-analysis for weight change. Significant intervention effects were identified for body weight in couples' intervention vs. individual intervention (-2.25 kg, 95% CI-3.63 to-0.88), and vs. no intervention (-4.5 kg, 95% CI-6.62 to-2.38). Conclusion: This systematic review and meta-analysis was the first to investigate the effectiveness of lifestyle interventions targeting couples on weight loss, compared to interventions focused on individuals or standard care. The findings suggest that interventions aimed at couples lead to greater weight loss, though the results should be interpreted with caution due to the wide heterogeneity among the studies. Further research is needed with evidence-based study designs, targeting younger participants, and incorporating longer intervention durations and follow-up periods.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nutrition and health
Nutrition and health Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
160
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信