巴西乳腺癌幸存者生活方式自我评估工具的开发、内容有效性和可用性。

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Nutrients Pub Date : 2024-10-30 DOI:10.3390/nu16213707
Jaqueline Schroeder de Souza, Nathalie Kliemann, Francilene Gracieli Kunradi Vieira, Aline Al Nahas, Luiza Kuhnen Reitz, Elom Kouassivi Aglago, Cândice Laís Knöner Copetti, Lilian Cardoso Vieira, Inge Huybrechts, Nivaldo Barroso de Pinho, Patricia Faria Di Pietro
{"title":"巴西乳腺癌幸存者生活方式自我评估工具的开发、内容有效性和可用性。","authors":"Jaqueline Schroeder de Souza, Nathalie Kliemann, Francilene Gracieli Kunradi Vieira, Aline Al Nahas, Luiza Kuhnen Reitz, Elom Kouassivi Aglago, Cândice Laís Knöner Copetti, Lilian Cardoso Vieira, Inge Huybrechts, Nivaldo Barroso de Pinho, Patricia Faria Di Pietro","doi":"10.3390/nu16213707","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/objectives: </strong>Breast cancer is the most common cancer among women globally, and it negatively impacts diet and quality of life, increasing the risk of recurrence. Adhering to World Cancer Research Fund (WCRF) and American Institute for Cancer Research (AICR) lifestyle guidelines, such as healthy eating habits and nutritional status, can help in primary and secondary cancer prevention. However, no questionnaire was found for self-assessment of these guidelines for the Brazilian population. The aim of this study is to carry out content validity, pilot, and usability testing of the self-administered digital instrument \"PrevCancer\" assessing adherence to the WCRF/AICR recommendations in Brazilian female breast cancer survivors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a psychometric study that involved the development of an instrument based on WCRF/AICR recommendations. Assessment of content validity involved the Content Validity Index (CVI) based on expert assessments (n = 7). The pilot study involved the System Usability Scale (SUS) after applying the developed instrument (n = 65) and anthropometric assessment for convergent validity by female participants (n = 55). The final usability test consisted of evaluating the satisfaction with the instrument of women with breast cancer (n = 14).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The \"PrevCancer\" instrument demonstrated good content (CVI = 1.0) as well as good usability and acceptability in the pilot study (mean SUS score = 88.1). The convergent validity stage demonstrated positive associations between the PrevCancer parameters and anthropometric parameters (<i>p</i> < 0.001). In the final usability study (mean SUS score = 90.3), participants' receptivity to the instrument was excellent.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The PrevCancer instrument had valid content and great usability by the target population, proving to be a useful tool for future cancer research.</p>","PeriodicalId":19486,"journal":{"name":"Nutrients","volume":"16 21","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11547887/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development, Content Validity and Usability of a Self-Assessment Instrument for the Lifestyle of Breast Cancer Survivors in Brazil.\",\"authors\":\"Jaqueline Schroeder de Souza, Nathalie Kliemann, Francilene Gracieli Kunradi Vieira, Aline Al Nahas, Luiza Kuhnen Reitz, Elom Kouassivi Aglago, Cândice Laís Knöner Copetti, Lilian Cardoso Vieira, Inge Huybrechts, Nivaldo Barroso de Pinho, Patricia Faria Di Pietro\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/nu16213707\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background/objectives: </strong>Breast cancer is the most common cancer among women globally, and it negatively impacts diet and quality of life, increasing the risk of recurrence. Adhering to World Cancer Research Fund (WCRF) and American Institute for Cancer Research (AICR) lifestyle guidelines, such as healthy eating habits and nutritional status, can help in primary and secondary cancer prevention. However, no questionnaire was found for self-assessment of these guidelines for the Brazilian population. The aim of this study is to carry out content validity, pilot, and usability testing of the self-administered digital instrument \\\"PrevCancer\\\" assessing adherence to the WCRF/AICR recommendations in Brazilian female breast cancer survivors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a psychometric study that involved the development of an instrument based on WCRF/AICR recommendations. Assessment of content validity involved the Content Validity Index (CVI) based on expert assessments (n = 7). The pilot study involved the System Usability Scale (SUS) after applying the developed instrument (n = 65) and anthropometric assessment for convergent validity by female participants (n = 55). The final usability test consisted of evaluating the satisfaction with the instrument of women with breast cancer (n = 14).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The \\\"PrevCancer\\\" instrument demonstrated good content (CVI = 1.0) as well as good usability and acceptability in the pilot study (mean SUS score = 88.1). The convergent validity stage demonstrated positive associations between the PrevCancer parameters and anthropometric parameters (<i>p</i> < 0.001). In the final usability study (mean SUS score = 90.3), participants' receptivity to the instrument was excellent.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The PrevCancer instrument had valid content and great usability by the target population, proving to be a useful tool for future cancer research.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19486,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nutrients\",\"volume\":\"16 21\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11547887/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nutrients\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/nu16213707\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NUTRITION & DIETETICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nutrients","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/nu16213707","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景/目的:乳腺癌是全球妇女中最常见的癌症,它对饮食和生活质量产生负面影响,增加了复发风险。遵守世界癌症研究基金会(WCRF)和美国癌症研究所(AICR)的生活方式指南,如健康的饮食习惯和营养状况,有助于癌症的一级和二级预防。然而,目前还没有针对巴西人口的生活方式指南自我评估问卷。本研究旨在对自我管理的数字工具 "PrevCancer "进行内容有效性、试点和可用性测试,以评估巴西女性乳腺癌幸存者对 WCRF/AICR 建议的遵守情况:我们根据 WCRF/AICR 的建议进行了一项心理测量研究,开发了一种工具。内容有效性评估包括基于专家评估(n = 7)的内容有效性指数(CVI)。试点研究包括在应用所开发的工具(n = 65)后进行系统可用性量表(SUS),以及由女性参与者(n = 55)进行人体测量评估,以确定收敛有效性。最后的可用性测试包括评估乳腺癌女性患者(14 人)对该工具的满意度:结果:在试点研究中,"PrevCancer "工具显示出良好的内容(CVI = 1.0)、可用性和可接受性(平均 SUS 分数 = 88.1)。收敛效度阶段显示,"癌症预防 "参数与人体测量参数之间存在正相关(p < 0.001)。在最终的可用性研究中(平均 SUS 得分 = 90.3),参与者对该工具的接受度非常高:PrevCancer 工具内容有效,目标人群非常易用,被证明是未来癌症研究的有用工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Development, Content Validity and Usability of a Self-Assessment Instrument for the Lifestyle of Breast Cancer Survivors in Brazil.

Background/objectives: Breast cancer is the most common cancer among women globally, and it negatively impacts diet and quality of life, increasing the risk of recurrence. Adhering to World Cancer Research Fund (WCRF) and American Institute for Cancer Research (AICR) lifestyle guidelines, such as healthy eating habits and nutritional status, can help in primary and secondary cancer prevention. However, no questionnaire was found for self-assessment of these guidelines for the Brazilian population. The aim of this study is to carry out content validity, pilot, and usability testing of the self-administered digital instrument "PrevCancer" assessing adherence to the WCRF/AICR recommendations in Brazilian female breast cancer survivors.

Methods: We conducted a psychometric study that involved the development of an instrument based on WCRF/AICR recommendations. Assessment of content validity involved the Content Validity Index (CVI) based on expert assessments (n = 7). The pilot study involved the System Usability Scale (SUS) after applying the developed instrument (n = 65) and anthropometric assessment for convergent validity by female participants (n = 55). The final usability test consisted of evaluating the satisfaction with the instrument of women with breast cancer (n = 14).

Results: The "PrevCancer" instrument demonstrated good content (CVI = 1.0) as well as good usability and acceptability in the pilot study (mean SUS score = 88.1). The convergent validity stage demonstrated positive associations between the PrevCancer parameters and anthropometric parameters (p < 0.001). In the final usability study (mean SUS score = 90.3), participants' receptivity to the instrument was excellent.

Conclusions: The PrevCancer instrument had valid content and great usability by the target population, proving to be a useful tool for future cancer research.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nutrients
Nutrients NUTRITION & DIETETICS-
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
15.30%
发文量
4599
审稿时长
16.74 days
期刊介绍: Nutrients (ISSN 2072-6643) is an international, peer-reviewed open access advanced forum for studies related to Human Nutrition. It publishes reviews, regular research papers and short communications. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信